Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Anderida Adolescent Care Ltd in East Sussex

Inspected 15 Mar 2013 · published 3 May 2013 · URN SC028536

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Hunnam

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Janet Hunnam

  • URN verified

    SC028536

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 52% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellenteffectivelygood progresshigh qualitymake good progressextremelyskilledconsistently
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinednot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings571w+30
  • What needs to improve43w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
611
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC028536 Inspection date 15/03/2013 Inspector Janet Hunnam Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 07/06/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

The setting is registered to accommodate two young people, of either sex, with emotional or behavioural difficulties. It is owned by a private company.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .

p.3

Progress

At the last inspection in June 2012, the home was judged as good for overall effectiveness. Since the beginning of February 2013, no young people have been resident at the home. A new Registered Manager has recently been appointed.

p.3

Progress

There were two requirements and one recommendation made at the last inspection. Staff have undertaken child protection and safeguarding training to update their practice and a training programme is in place to ensure staff are appropriately skilled to care for young people at the home. The home has a disciplinary policy for staff in place, separate from child protection enquiries, but there are no clear procedures available for staff where an allegation is made against a member of staff.

p.3

Progress

The home continues to provide high quality of care for young people. Excellent identification of individual needs with comprehensive risk assessments and detailed guidelines and strategies enable staff to work effectively with young people. Close and intense support enables young people to make significant progress and reduce their risk-taking behaviour. Young people also make good progress in relation to their education and pursuing a healthy lifestyle. Young people’s emotional and psychological needs have a high priority. They have direct access to individual sessions with the organisation’s clinical psychologist. Staff also receive regular clinical support from a psychologist to inform their behaviour management strategies and risk-reduction measures, assisting them to work effectively with young people.

p.3

Progress

Staff are extremely proactive in safeguarding young people at the home and work closely with external agencies to protect young people. The safety and welfare of young people is central to practice at the home. Staff work consistently within clear boundaries and guidelines to help keep young people safe.

p.4

Progress

Monitoring systems are rigorous and robust ensuring all aspects of care provision are routinely reviewed. Comprehensive reports follow monthly visits. The Registered Manager completes weekly checks of Schedule 6 matters. The Registered Manager is in the process of compiling a Regulation 34 report to send to Ofsted.

p.4

Progress

The home provides a warm and homely environment for young people. The home is well maintained, furnished and decorated. Routine health and safety checks take place to protect staff and young people.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure that in the case of an allegation against staff, procedures relating to how staff will be supported are available to staff. (NMS 20.3)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion