Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Apr 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bernard Campbell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bernard Campbell

  • Postcode verified

    HU16 5BP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimproving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings30w0
  • What needs to improve51w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
80
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 45
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 92%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr D Clark Headteacher Bacon Garth Primary School The Garth Cottingham HU16 5BP

p.1

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 16 April 2013 to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of five lessons and visits to sessions teaching letters and sounds.

p.1

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

The overall effectiveness of English is outstanding.

p.1

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

 Pupils enter nursery below age-related expectations. They make good progress in developing their communication, language and literacy skills and by the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage attainment is average.  In 2012, fewer than average Year 1 pupils met the national standard for their knowledge of letters and sounds. This year the teaching of letters and sounds has improved and pupils have made better progress. Overall, pupils make good progress at Key Stage 1. Attainment in reading and writing has improved year-on-year and was above average in 2012.

p.1

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

 At Key Stage 2, attainment is above average in reading and writing. Pupils of all abilities make outstanding progress at Key Stage 2 and achievement has been exceptionally high for several years. Extra help enables individuals with particular needs to make good progress.  Pupils are excited by their English lessons. They take great pride in learning in their topic-based English work. They are inspired by the enthusiastic teaching and imaginative ways of learning.

p.1

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

 The best teaching makes excellent use of the topic to stimulate interest, increase knowledge and take pupils imaginatively into other times and places. For example, Year 6 pupils enjoyed the challenge of developing their skills in using subordinate clauses by explaining events in the Anglo- Zulu Wars. Year 3 pupils deepened their appreciation of 1950s music by examining a news report of Buddy Holly’s death and comparing it with the lyrics of ‘American Pie’. Teaching provides careful modelling of what pupils are expected to write, which enables them to tackle tasks with confidence. Staff provide well-focused additional support for different language needs and for individual pupils who are falling behind. On occasion, grammar work is too mechanical.  The teaching of letters and sounds has improved this year as a result of targeting teaching more accurately to the needs of different groups. Observed good teaching involved individual pupils actively responding to

p.2

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

letters and sounds.  Visually stimulating learning resources, on paper and on screen, contribute to pupils’ high levels of motivation and they influence the quality of pupils’ written work. Clear and well- presented guidance on targets, skills and key words supports and directs learning well. Classroom displays make excellent use of mannequins to bring topic learning to life. Imaginative displays celebrate different types of writing by pupils in all years.  The progress of pupils is very well evidenced in the book of each pupil’s assessed work. Half-termly assessments systematically document pupils’ achievement in different types of writing from Years 1 to 6. Learning journals in the Early Years Foundation Stage also provide an excellent record of pupils’ progress. Marking is personal and specific and provides constructive praise and guidance on how to improve.

p.2

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

The curriculum in English is outstanding.

p.2

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

 The curriculum provides memorable experiences. Pupils talked enthusiastically about the impact of historical and geographical topics in English, including the vocabulary they had learnt and writing they had done. For example, pupils discovered a confederate soldier under a tree and discussion led to high quality and well-informed writing about the American Civil War. Well-planned topic work provides pupils with a strong knowledge base which is used to develop and organise their writing and give it meaning.  The curriculum provides a rigorous framework of skills to be taught and assessed at text, sentence and word level. The types of reading and writing are clearly and comprehensively mapped for each topic and each half term in all years. Clear guidance is provided on questions to develop pupils’ skills in reading comprehension. Extended writing is built in to weekly plans. The approach to correcting spelling is systematic. Guidance

p.2

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

on handwriting is effective. The teaching of letters and sounds improved as a result of grouping pupils by ability and increasing the use of trained teaching assistants. The introduction of a new scheme is planned.  Rewards for reading and writing, including poetry, motivate pupils. Half termly topic presentations by classes are scripted and acted in full costume. Many visits and visitors widen pupils’ experience, including theatre visits, a puppet theatre, Bible story tellers and an annual book fair.

p.3

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

Leadership and management of English are outstanding.

p.3

Ofsted 2013–14 subject survey inspection programme: English

 Leaders’ vision of English within a topic-based curriculum provides a coherent and inspiring framework for teaching and learning. The expert subject leader provides strong direction about the skills to be learnt and assessed and how to teach them. Expectations of pupils and staff are high.  Rigorous planning has led to strong consistency in the approaches to reading, writing, spelling and handwriting. Assessment is frequent and excellently documented. Staff are encouraged to be imaginative and enhance the English curriculum by using their own skills and interests, for example in history, art and music. The needs of pupils needing extra help are identified well and met with great care. The evaluation of teaching and of pupils’ work is detailed and reflective and clearly highlights where things can be improved. Professional development is accurately focused on identified needs.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 further improving the teaching of letters and sounds.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion