Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Gehane Gordelier
- Postcode verified
SO30 0PQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 864
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Gavin Hayman Headteacher Kings Copse Primary School Kings Copse Road, Southampton SO30 0PQ
p.1
Education act 2005 to Kings Copse Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 25 th March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Kings Copse Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, the senior leadership team, the Chair of the Governing Body and a parent governor, and a representative from the local authority. The inspector spoke to a group of pupils, undertook a learning walk with the headteacher and looked at a range of school documentation including the post-Ofsted action plan.
p.1
Context
There have been no significant changes to the context of the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email :christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Main findings
Leaders and managers have been quick to respond to the areas in need of improvement. There is a detailed post-Ofsted action plan that identifies clear timescales, actions needed and the progress the school hopes to make. Although there are intended outcomes for pupils included in the plan there is not enough focus on different groups of pupils and how their progress will be measured.
p.2
Main findings
Staff and governors are now more focused on the learning and progress of pupils. The headteacher is empowering senior leaders to develop their role and this is having a positive impact on improving the quality of teaching and learning, including for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs. Consequently, expectations are rising; teachers are improving the quality of their marking and are making better use of assessment information, particularly in mathematics to plan lessons that meet the learning needs of all pupils. There are more opportunities for pupils to read during the course of the school day. Some initiatives are still in their infancy and have yet to be securely and consistently well embedded across the school.
p.2
Main findings
The quality of teaching, learning and planning in the Early Years Foundation Stage is not being monitored closely enough to ensure that expectations are sufficiently high, particularly in writing, and that the needs of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are always fully reflected in daily planning.
p.2
Main findings
The quality of the learning environment around the school has significantly improved. Pupils told the inspector how much they appreciate the high quality reading books that are now available to them. They welcome their teachers taking more time to explain new concepts and the increased use of practical resources, particularly in their mathematics lessons.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders and managers track the progress of pupils more frequently. However, they have yet to all make good use of average point scores, especially to compare the performance of different groups of pupils. Although governors are developing their role and are supportive of the school they do not always challenge the school as well as they could and would benefit from an audit of their training needs.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
Refine the school's post-Ofsted action plan so that it focuses more sharply on different groups of pupils. Ensure all children make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage, particularly in writing, and that the needs of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are fully reflected in daily planning. Develop the use of average point scores, so that all leaders and managers use this information to compare the performance of different groups of pupils. Strengthen the governing body by undertaking an audit of their training needs, so that they are better able to challenge the school about its performance, particularly about the progress made by different groups of pupils in English and mathematics.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The school makes effective use of the good support provided by the local authority. This is helping the mathematics leader in particular to develop his role and staff are also improving the quality of their practice in teaching mathematics. Senior leaders appreciate the clear next steps recorded in the local authority's reports of visits. The literacy leader values the support and challenge provided by the literacy adviser. The Leadership and Learning Partner provides senior leaders with strong support to help them improve the quality of their action planning, set challenging targets and analyse data.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion