Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by S P Homes Limited in Lambeth
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
14 Mar 2013
- Inspectors verified
Paul Taylor
- URN verified
SC065535
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- At the last inspection, carried out in October 2012, the home was judged to be inadequate. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 772
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC065535 Inspection date 14/03/2013 Inspector Paul Taylor Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 17/10/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This is a privately-run children's home which caters for up to six young people who have emotional or behavioural difficulties.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection, carried out in October 2012, the home was judged to be inadequate. At that inspection four requirements and three recommendations were made.
p.3
Progress
The home has fully addressed all of the requirements made. There are now systems which effectively ensure that all notifications, reports written as a result of monitoring visits and reviews of the service are forwarded to Ofsted. Additionally, the home has effectively addressed shortfalls identified by the local fire and rescue service after an inspection carried out in September 2012. The home has ensured that all members of staff are appropriately trained and that all fire prevention equipment, such as self-closing door devices, is serviced and working. The fire and rescue service has written to the home and expressed that it is satisfied that all the issues have been addressed. It is clear that monitoring and promotion of young people's safety has been improved as a result of improvements made.
p.3
Progress
Two out of three recommendations made at the last inspection are met. The home no longer locks doors to internal communal areas, such as the lounge and kitchen, as part of routine practice. This means that young people have access to these areas without any restrictions. The home has also implemented a new system to monitor the administration of medication. This ensures that the records of medication administered to young people and the amount of medication in stock are up to date and accurate.
p.3
Progress
One recommendation is not fully addressed in relation to the home not having a written risk assessment for staff working alone. Members of staff are aware of what to do and who they can turn to for help but this is not underpinned by written procedures or a risk assessment. The staff knowledge of the young people and their awareness of what to do ensures that no one is at risk. However, the recommendation that the manager makes certain that all members of staff have access to a written procedure and risk assessment remains. This will ensure everyone will know what to do in the event that there are new young people admitted to the home and that information is available if new members of staff are appointed to work at the home.
p.4
Progress
Young people benefit from living at the home. The care and nurturing provided has enabled young people to make significant progress, particularly when bearing in mind their starting points. The home encourages and enables young people to attend full time education, join clubs based in the community and to increase independence and personal-care skills.
p.4
Progress
The home ensures on-going training is made available to members of staff, for example in safeguarding and the newly-implemented fire training. This knowledge enables members of staff to promote young people's safety. The staff team also meet on a weekly basis so that all members of staff know what is happening in the home and how to consistently support each young person living there. This ensures that nurturing and individualised care is delivered which in turn, enables young people to develop and progress.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that when only one member of staff is on duty at any time, a risk assessment has been carried out and recorded in writing, identifying any likely risks to children, staff and members of the public. (NMS 17.9)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion