Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Sheffield City Council in Sheffield
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
7 Mar 2013
- Inspectors verified
Debbie Foster
- URN verified
SC356868
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular, address deficiencies identified in a timely manner, for example reviewing risk assessments immediately as changes occur. p.4
- In particular, ensure that risk assessments are specific in terms of the type and frequency of monitoring required and that they clearly set out the boundaries in place for individual young people. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 746
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC356868 Inspection date 07/03/2013 Inspector Debbie Foster Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 06/12/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This children's home, run by a local authority, provides up to 5 long-term placements for young people, aged from 12 up to 17 years of age on admission.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection in December 2012, the overall effectiveness rating of the service was judged as good. Outcomes for some young people have improved, particularly in education or work placement attendance and in gaining additional independence life skills. The actions taken by staff and with the involvement of other professionals, ensures that young people are well supported and has assisted in reducing risk taking behaviour. However, despite the provision of well-targeted and determined support from staff, some young people's behaviour on occasions remains negative and challenging and has contributed to a decline in some of their outcomes. The manager is directing the efforts of staff into arresting this decline. Staff are supported to do this through daily handovers, team meetings and regular supervision, where strategies are reviewed and revised.
p.3
Progress
Positive action has been made to address three out of the four recommendations made at the last inspection. Young people's progress is more effectively recorded to reflect the aims and objectives of their independence plans. This indicates the development of their independence skills in preparation for adulthood and leaving care. The registered person has provided Ofsted with a six monthly summary of the monitoring undertaken and how the service in bringing about improvements to the quality of care provided for young people. However, when reports identify shortfalls in the service, they have not all been acted up on in a timely manner, for example reviewing risk assessments. In addition, not all risk assessments are specific in terms of the type and frequency of monitoring required for individual young people. They do not set out specific guidance for staff to follow to ensure young people are suitably supported and kept safe on the occasions when they are presenting risk
p.3
Progress
Young people's views, wishes and feeling are acted upon, in the day to day running of the home. A young person said, ' I can talk to staff at any time and give my views and we do have residents' meetings where we make suggestions about things. I am listened to. Incidents around the home are happening less but there are still some.' The negative behaviour of some young people living in the home has reduced. As a result, this is affecting other young people less and they are happier to spend time in their own home.
p.4
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) establish and maintain a system for improving the quality of care provided in the children’s home. In particular, address deficiencies identified in a timely manner, for example reviewing risk assessments immediately as changes occur. (Regulation 34 (1)( b) 28/05/2013
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that the home has a clear written policy on managing behaviour that all staff understand and apply at all times. In particular, ensure that risk assessments are specific in terms of the type and frequency of monitoring required and that they clearly set out the boundaries in place for individual young people. (NMS 3.3)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion