Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Apr 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Young

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Young

  • Postcode verified

    LS26 8AR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+24Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingambitiousexcellenthigh-qualityenthusiasticpositiveimprovedeffective
Criticismweaknessesshortcomingsat riskseriousslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings157w0
  • Leadership779w+24

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
936
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 16%Leadership 81%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mrs D Simpson Headteacher Great Preston VC CofE Primary School Preston Lane Great Preston Leeds West Yorkshire LS26 8AR

p.1

Serious Weaknesses inspection of Great Preston VC CofE Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 25 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious Weaknesses inspection of Great Preston VC CofE Primary School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, several other school leaders, a local authority representative and the Chair and vice-chair of the Governing Body. The local authority’s statement of action and school-development plans were evaluated. The inspector also briefly visited every class in the school.

p.1

Context

Since the inspection one teacher has resigned and three others are absent due to illness. The school has employed four interim teachers to cover the classes affected.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s leaders have not let their disappointment with the judgement from the inspection in January distract them from working hard to tackle the identified areas for improvement which they acknowledge are accurate, but assert were already CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jsimmons@cfbt.com known to them and being addressed. To this end, leaders have reviewed, modified and sought to enhance almost every aspect of the school’s work in an attempt to rapidly address the school’s shortcomings. This included a frank, root and branch evaluation of the value for money provided by all staff and the suitability and impact of existing policies and systems. This appraisal informed the school’s development planning and brought to light some uncomfortable truths and matters that have had

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

to be dealt with forcefully. The focused and proactive headteacher, supported by her enthusiastic and talented team of leaders are rolling out a set of strategic actions designed to raise pupils’ achievement, improve the quality and impact of teaching and increase the effectiveness of leadership throughout the school. Central to this strategy has been a change in ethos, including: the introduction of a ‘no excuses’ culture; clarifying staff roles and duties; adapting curriculum provision; raising staff expectations and awareness of what pupils are capable of; encouraging pupils to be more ambitious and take some responsibility for their own learning; and increased rigour and regularity in tracking and evaluation processes and assessment methods. There is also a focus on holding staff to account for their performance. Underpinning these developments has been some high-quality coaching, training and mentoring,

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

and work to ensure staff understand the rationale behind the major changes taking place. There has also been a greater emphasis on identifying and intervening to improve the progress of pupils who are at risk of, or are already underachieving, with specialist support and guidance. This has been done against a backdrop of some turbulence in staffing which has not aided the school’s cause or continuity in children’s learning.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s latest data indicate that more pupils are regaining the lost ground in their learning caused by their previous underachievement. The data also suggests that the 2013 Year 6 national test results will significantly exceed those achieved in 2012, particularly for the proportion of pupils gaining above age-related levels. Recent monitoring of teaching shows that the number of lessons where teaching is good or better is rising. Leadership responsibility is being distributed more widely within the school.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

These events show that the actions taken to date are having a positive impact. However, the key challenge for the school will be to provide inspectors with sufficiently compelling evidence at its next section 5 inspection that the school’s effectiveness has improved sufficiently for the serious weaknesses judgement to be removed.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Governors, while committed and ambitious for the school recognise that over time they have fallen short of holding the school’s leaders sufficiently to account for pupils’ slow progress. Steps have been taken to rectify this and just before the inspection in January, a new Chair, vice-chair and several other new governors were appointed. A governor development plan is being implemented to help ensure governors are better equipped to be more discerning in their support and challenge of the school’s performance and their appraisal of the senior staff responsible. Governors have also forged an alliance with, and are taking advice from, the governing body of an outstanding school. They have reconstituted their committee structure to ensure a sharper focus on the school’s key priorities.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school is part of a collaborative trust comprising several local primary schools and the local high school. Collectively, they are providing some effective leadership, teaching and learning and assessment support, advice and guidance which are helping to accelerate the school’s improvement. By pooling resources, they have made a number of joint appointments, including literacy and numeracy strategy leaders to embed excellent practice across the trust and boost pupils’ achievement. The local authority also offers some valuable support to the school. This has included the brokering of the link with an outstanding school and establishing the joint review group to monitor and evaluate the school’s progress in tackling its weaknesses.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority statement of action is fit for purpose

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s development plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Leeds Local Authority. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion