Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by St Hill Establishments Ltd in Kingston upon Hull

Inspected 7 Mar 2013 · published 23 Apr 2013 · URN SC385633

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Martin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    7 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    David Martin

  • URN verified

    SC385633

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresssuccessfulpositiveimprovedpositivelyclear
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinedconcerningnot engaging

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
623
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC385633 Inspection date 07/03/2013 Inspector David Martin Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 10/09/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

The children's home is run by a private company. The home is registered to provide a service for up to five children or young people, male or female, with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

p.3

Brief description of the service

The home mainly provides placements for the local authority it is situated in. Young people receive care until such a time they can return to family, move to alternative specialist placements or can live independently.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

This home had its last full inspection in September 2012. Its overall effectiveness was judged to be good and it achieved good judgements in quality of care, safeguarding and leadership and management. Outcomes for young people were considered to be adequate. Requirements and recommendations were made concerning the effectiveness of quality assurance processes, consultation with young people, the use of sanctions and the emotional well-being of young people. The home has made good progress in achieving the necessary improvements.

p.3

Progress

Quality assurance processes have improved. Reports produced under Regulations 33 and 34 are clear, comprehensive and evaluative. They now make reference to young people’s views and both are now submitted to Ofsted as required. The home recognises their significance in contributing to the continuous development of the home. This ensures that the home continues to operate in the best interests of young people.

p.3

Progress

The home has fully reviewed the way in which sanctions are applied. The use of financial sanctions has been stopped other than in cases where young people have misspent money. The home has implemented the principles of restorative justice and has championed discussion and negotiation as an alternative means of resolving the majority of issues. This has been very successful and the use of sanctions is now infrequent and in recent months none has been applied. Young people benefit from a positive approach to the management of contentious issues.

p.4

Progress

At the time of the last inspection, some young people were not engaging well with adults, educational placements and external support services. The home has been successful in establishing and re-establishing positive relationships with all young people. In the last half-term, young people’s attendance at school has been very good. Some young people still find it hard to cooperate with mental health services. However, the home has good links to these services and can seek to re-refer when young people feel personally ready to undertake therapeutic work. The arrangements in place ensure that the emotion well-being of young people is a priority and positively promoted.

p.4

Progress

Overall, the home has made good progress in complying with the requirements and recommendations made in the last inspection report. No requirements or recommendations are made as a result of this inspection.

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion