Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Apr 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Shirley Gornall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Shirley Gornall

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 52% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousrigorousconsistentlypositiveeffectiveenjoymentrichclearly
Criticismpoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
853
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jbennett@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Jane Grecic Executive Headteacher Cherry Tree Primary School Highfield Road Farnworth Bolton Lancashire BL4 0NS

p.1

Education act 2005 to Cherry Tree Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 15 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Cherry Tree Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the executive headteacher, the acting head of school and a representative of the governing body. A telephone discussion took place with a representative of the local authority. Short visits were made to most classes. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Various monitoring reports and records of pupils’ progress were considered.

p.1

Context

There have been no changes to staffing, governance or to the number of pupils on the school roll since the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Main findings

The school improvement plan has been revised and includes appropriate activities with realistic timescales, responsible personnel and suitably ambitious success criteria. The plan is regularly reviewed and shared with staff. It clearly indicates the direction and pace of the school’s work.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are working hard to develop consistency of expectations across all classes in terms of pupils’ achievement. The school’s assessment of pupils’ progress is rigorous and accurate, taking account of their performance in a range of classwork and tests. The good practice of some teachers in assessing pupils’ work is being shared with other schools through moderation activities.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are providing individual support to teachers in order to ensure that teaching is consistently at least good. Leaders observe teachers’ work regularly and systematically, and provide good quality developmental feedback, along with coaching or training as appropriate.

p.2

Main findings

A raising achievement group has been established, including governors, senior leaders and a local authority representative. This group monitors the school’s work in addressing its key improvement priorities and ensures that there is no slippage in completing planned actions.

p.2

Main findings

The curriculum has been reviewed and expectations about the teaching of foundation subjects have been raised, so that the same rigour is evident in teachers’ planning of topic work as in their planning of literacy and numeracy lessons. Classroom displays of pupils’ work indicate that they are producing better quality writing in a range of subjects. Their writing in science has been enlivened by the experience of hatching chicks in school.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders, including those responsible for literacy and numeracy, are supporting teachers in planning suitable activities to meet the needs of students of varying attainment levels. Pupil groupings have been adjusted to allow more-able pupils to consolidate their skills in order to attain the higher levels. In mathematics, challenge activities have been developed that stretch pupils’ thinking and enable them to use and apply their skills in real-life contexts.

p.2

Main findings

The school is reviewing its provision for information communication technology (ICT) and has produced costed plans to refresh equipment. In the meantime, staff are working hard to provide opportunities for pupils to use ICT in different subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders monitor pupils’ books systematically and provide feedback to teachers on the quality and helpfulness of marking. Governors have also reviewed pupils’ work books as part of their monitoring of standards.

p.2

Main findings

The school continues to work hard with families to emphasise the importance of good attendance. Letters are sent home to inform parents of the attendance rates of their children, and the impact of poor attendance on learning. These efforts are having a positive impact and pupils’ attendance is now in line with the national average. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

evaluate the impact of curriculum changes on the development of pupils’ writing

p.3

Main findings

enable pupils to evaluate the school’s progress against its priorities and report their thoughts to the governing body

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority keeps the school’s work under review and provides appropriate support through the designated lead professional who moderates leaders’ work, for instance by undertaking lesson observations with them to assure the quality of their judgements and feedback. The school’s leaders and teachers have access to a range of professional development opportunities, including through attendance at local support networks. The school has recently contributed to an exciting project, co-ordinated by the local authority, to enhance pupils’ enjoyment of, and response to, rich literary texts.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Bolton.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion