Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Apr 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anne Seneviratne

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anne Seneviratne

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongimprovingaccurate
Criticisminadequateweaknessesnot clearnot effectivelybelownot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
792
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 937 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jsimmons@cfbt.com

p.1

Dr Christopher Meehan Headteacher St Cuthbert's RC Business and Enterprise College Shaw Road Rochdale Lancashire OL16 4RX

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Cuthbert's RC Business and Enterprise College

Following my visit to your school on 14 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Cuthbert's RC Business and Enterprise College

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, other senior leaders, the Chair and two members of the governing body, a representative from the local authority and a group of students. I scrutinised the school action plan as well as other key documentation. You accompanied me on a series of brief visits to lessons.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection the school has made five new appointments to mathematics, including a new head of department, who will join the senior leadership team. She will take up her post in May, along with another teacher. The other three will start in September 2013.

p.1

Main findings

Where teaching is inadequate, leaders have wasted no time in taking swift and decisive action. A programme of formal monitoring and peer coaching of staff whose teaching is judged to be less than good has resulted in an increase in the quality of teaching across the school. The learning and teaching group provides bespoke weekly training focused on improving classroom practice but this has not had time to have an impact across all lessons.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders have produced an action plan to address the improvements highlighted in the last inspection. This covers all of the appropriate areas but does not focus precisely enough on what needs to happen to bring about rapid improvement. It is also not clear how the impact of actions taken will be checked in the short term.

p.2

Main findings

You have prioritised raising students’ achievement in mathematics and have been proactive in securing five new members of staff to this department, including a new head of department with a proven track record of leading improvement in schools. Activities to help students catch up and revision sessions are very much appreciated by students, particularly those in Year 11. A special educational needs coordinator has been appointed but it is too soon to establish the impact of her work on the progress made by students supported through school action plus or those with statements of special educational needs.

p.2

Main findings

The new system for tracking students’ progress is embedded across the school. However, the process for setting individual student targets has some weaknesses. The system is not being used effectively to forecast how students will perform at the end of each key stage.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has supported some of the tough decisions that have had to be made, in particular where these have related to staffing issues. Governors are able to challenge leaders more robustly because they now receive better quality data which gives them a more accurate view of students’ achievement.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 sharpen the school action plan so that leaders can measure and evaluate the impact of their actions at regular intervals

p.2

Main findings

 refine the systems for tracking students’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school receives strong and effective support from the local authority. The senior school improvement partner has brokered a link with a nearby teaching school. Through this link, you are being supported by a National Leader in Education and senior leaders are being coached by leaders in the teaching school. The local authority is also brokering training for governors. This support is very much valued by leaders and governors. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Rochdale and as below.

p.2

Her Majesty's Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty's Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body  Local authority  Diocese - for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled school  The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation  The lead inspector.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion