Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Apr 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Leszek Iwaskow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Leszek Iwaskow

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovingoutstandingmake good progressenjoymentpreciseclearsecure
Criticismgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
824
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Michael Boland Headteacher St Lewis Catholic Primary School Mustard Lane Croft Warrington Cheshire WA3 7BD

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Lewis Catholic Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 21 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Lewis Catholic Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and deputy headteacher, the Chair and one other member of the Governing Body and a group of pupils. A meeting was also held with a representative from the local authority. The school’s development plan and monitoring file were also evaluated.

p.1

Context

There are no significant changes since the most recent inspection.

p.1

Main findings

An effective development plan is in place. This is firmly focused on the key issues which need improving, as identified in the recent Ofsted inspection report. Actions are precise and achievable. The plan is being amended on a regular basis to identify where improvements are happening and what needs to be done further in order that the school gets to good as quickly as possible. There is much greater collective responsibility, a common shared vision and real determination that this will be achieved sooner rather than later. Strategies are beginning to impact on improving learning and classroom practice. Data is showing that standards are improving and that the pace of this improvement is accelerating. There is better identification of need as monitoring begins to identify underachievement rather than special educational need. Senior management responsibilities have been re- organised to focus more specifically on improving teaching and raising achievement. Pupils

p.1

Main findings

are also aware of improvements which are featuring in their lessons. Marking and feedback is more informative and pupils are expected to act on these recommendations. For example, correction of spellings. They feel they are benefitting from this. Work is better suited to individual needs and pupils are being made more aware of their targets and what they need to do to improve. They are also being given more opportunities to work independently rather than being directed by the teacher. The school is aware of the need to be more outward looking and build links with other schools and establishments in order to share good practice and learn from success elsewhere. There is a greater involvement at all levels, including middle leaders. There is a clear desire and commitment to make improvements which are secure and make a difference to the pupils. The school is well placed to make good progress in the future.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are firmly committed to ensuring that improvements are fast-tracked and underperformance is challenged. To support this, a special post-Ofsted improvement committee has been established and meets regularly to get feedback from the headteacher and middle leaders on the progress being made. Governors are fully involved in holding management to account. They also have training planned to raise their awareness further of what a good and outstanding school is like.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

continue to improve the quality of pupils’ classroom experiences through informative feedback and making sure that pupils act on the advice offered

p.2

Main findings

 ensure that middle leaders monitor outcomes for pupils rigorously through work scrutiny as well as observations in order to identify the progress that pupils are making as well as any gaps in provision

p.2

Main findings

continue to strengthen middle leadership by making them responsible for developing their subjects by providing appropriate ideas and resources to improve outcomes and enjoyment for pupils

p.2

Main findings

engage with other schools in the area to observe and share good practice in order to improve provision across the school.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school has, until recently, only received light-touch support from the local authority. Support is now more frequent and focused. Advice offered has been astute and perceptive and has supported potential improvements well. The local authority plans to broker further support as required, especially in sign-posting the school towards good practice in other schools from which it can learn and develop its own practice. A good partnership is being established.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Warrington.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion