Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Steve Isherwood
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 622
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com
p.1
Mr Dean Tombling Headteacher Knowleswood Primary School Knowles Lane Holmewood Bradford West Yorkshire BD4 9AE
p.1
Education act 2005 to Knowleswood Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 18 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Knowleswood Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior staff, subject leaders, governors, a group of pupils and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement plan was evaluated. A range of documentation was reviewed, including the tracking of pupils’ progress, monitoring reports and records of lesson observations. In addition, the headteacher took the HMI on a tour of the school to look briefly at teaching and learning.
p.1
Context
Since the inspection the teacher with responsibility for literacy has resigned. As yet, no new appointment has been made to fill this vacancy.
p.1
Main findings
Following the section 5 inspection senior leaders and governors have responded positively and taken appropriate action to lay the foundations for improvements in pupils’ learning and in accelerating their progress. Immediate action has been taken to strengthen provision and tighten procedures. The senior leadership team has been extended; roles and responsibilities are clearer; systems to check on the quality of teaching have improved with planned programmes in place for lesson observations, work scrutiny and discussions with pupils. In addition, there are regular reviews of how pupils are achieving and staff are held to account for the progress their pupils are making. As a result, the school is in a stronger position to judge how well pupils are achieving and plan appropriate support.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders are not complacent and correctly recognise that the next step is to seek further clarification with teachers on what constitutes effective practice in pupils’ learning.
p.2
Main findings
The school improvement plan reflects the areas of priority and provides a clear direction for the school. However, some of the targets within the plan are not as sharp as they could be because it is not always clear how planned action will be measured and evaluated. This makes it difficult for leaders and governors to judge how well the school is improving over- time.
p.2
Main findings
Governance is becoming sharper-edged. Governors are committed to see the school improve. They are aware of the reasons why the school is not yet good and understand what is being done to improve the school. They are increasing their confidence to act as a critical friend and hold senior leaders to account.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
● fine-tune measurable success criteria in the school improvement plan.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The support for the school from the local authority is well tailored to the school’s most pressing priorities and is helping to improve the quality of teaching, raise pupils’ achievement and strengthen leadership.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Bradford.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion