Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Marianne Young
- Postcode verified
HG4 1LT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 623
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Darren Dudman Headteacher Ripon Cathedral C of E School Priest Lane Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 1LT
p.1
England School
Following my visit to your school on 19 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
England School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in December 2012.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior leaders, the Chair and five members of the Governing Body and two representatives of the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action plan were evaluated.
p.1
Context
Since the December inspection, three governors have been appointed. In February 2013, the acting Chair of the Governing Body was confirmed as the substantive Chair. One member of staff has left and their class is being taught by a temporary CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancashire Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : gail.hill@cfbt.com teacher; two other teachers will leave at the end of March 2013. Three teachers have been appointed and will take up their posts at the start of the summer term.
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
A comprehensive action plan has been written which indicates the actions to be taken to improve provision in each of the four key areas identified at the December inspection. Dates for when monitoring will take place are provided and the persons responsible for checking that this will happen and what is still to be done, are indicated. Lesson observations, looking at pupils’ work books and meeting to check whether pupils are being given their correct levels are providing leaders with a clear understanding of how well pupils are doing.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The Education Development Adviser (EDA) from the local authority, together with subject consultants, works closely with leaders and teachers. Staff are clear how to review the progress of the pupils in their class and then share their findings with senior leaders. This, together with a more rigorous performance management system to ensure that teachers reach their targets, is helping to strengthen accountability but it is too early to judge the impact of this work.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s action plan and the plan written by the local authority have similar success criteria but often these are too general and need to be specific. For example, seeing if interventions have improved the progress made by pupils is not measurable. Consequently, leaders, governors and external reviewers gain a limited view of improvements.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The professional expertise and educational experience of the newly appointed governors has increased the degree of challenge to leaders. They are involved in the work of the school and understand the need to make rapid and sustained improvements. Members of the governing body have close links with parents. The ‘Update to Parents’ document is a positive indication that governors want parents to be involved in and know about the school.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s action plan is fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Both plans would benefit from strengthening. Neither indicates regular intermediate milestones that can be used by those responsible for evaluating so that they can check whether enough progress is being made by all groups of pupils. The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion