Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Stockton Heath Primary School

Inspected 21 Mar 2013 · published 22 Apr 2013 · URN 110996

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Margot D'Arcy (lead), Jennifer Lawrence

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    21 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Jennifer Lawrence, Margot D'Arcy

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    WA4 6HX

  • Name on report verified

    Stockton Heath Primary School

  • URN verified

    110996

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingexceptionallyvery wellexemplaryhighly effectiveconsistentlyeffective
Criticismnot yetinadequateweaknessesrequires improvementnot effectivenot consistentlyunevenserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings503w+87
  • Leadership696w+34
  • What needs to improve1384w+57

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,503
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 15%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 41%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Stockton Heath Primary School West Avenue, Stockton Heath, Warrington, Cheshire, WA4 6HX

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Inadequate 4 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Although pupils’ achievement in reading, writing and mathematics is improving, their progress is not consistently good in all year groups.  Pupils’ standards of attainment by the end of Years 2 and 6 are not high enough.  While teaching has improved and there are more examples of good and outstanding lessons, it is not yet effective enough to ensure that all pupils make good progress.  The impact of subject leaders in supporting school improvement is still at a relatively early stage of development.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 The headteacher and deputy headteacher drive improvement exceptionally well. Their excellent leadership and management skills have been instrumental in improving teaching and learning and establishing a strong senior leadership team.  Relative to the time that other senior leaders have held their positions, they have also contributed very well to school improvement.  The school’s senior leaders are excellent role models for teaching.  Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage benefit from consistently high-quality teaching and learning experiences. As a result, they achieve well in all aspects of their work.  Pupils feel safe and happy in school. Their conduct is exemplary and, when lessons are interesting and they are given work that meets their needs, they apply themselves well.  Governors have high expectations for the school’s improvement. They ask the right questions to ensure that they are well informed

p.1

The school has the following strengths

about how effective the teaching is and how well pupils are learning.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 17 lessons, four of which were conducted jointly with the school’s senior leaders.  Inspectors analysed pupils’ work and the school’s data about their attainment and progress. They listened to some pupils read, held two formal discussions with pupils and spoke to others informally in lessons and at break times and lunchtimes.  Meetings were held with senior leaders and with three governors.  A discussion was held with a representative from the local authority.  Inspectors observed the school’s work and analysed a range of school documentation. This included: safeguarding records and those relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance; records of the school’s checks on the quality of teaching and pupils’ learning; improvement plans; and records of governors’ meetings.  There were insufficient responses to the on-line parent questionnaire (Parent View) so inspectors took account of a recent parental survey conducted by the school.

p.2

Inspection team

Margot D'Arcy, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Jennifer Lawrence Additional Inspector

p.2

Full report

In accordance with section 13 (4) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures.

p.3

Information about this school

 When the school was inspected in June 2011 it was judged to require special measures. Subsequently, it was inspected on four occasions.  The school is larger than the average sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs supported through school action is average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is below average.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium, which provides additional funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, in local authority care or whose parents are in the armed forces, is below average.  The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups and who speak English as an additional language is low.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics.

p.3

Information about this school

 Since the school’s last full inspection a considerable number of new staff have been appointed, including a new headteacher.  The school has gained a number of awards, including Healthy School status and Activemark.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good or better in order to raise pupils’ attainment and enable all to make at least good progress in reading, writing and mathematics. The school should do this by ensuring that:  lessons and the work pupils are given challenge and motivate them all and build well on what they already know  teachers make maximum use of lesson time to enable pupils to learn quickly  teachers maintain an overview of how well all pupils are learning during lessons, intervening where necessary to check on the impact of support staff in promoting pupils’ learning.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Further improve the quality of leadership and management by:  building on work already underway to develop roles and the impact of subject leaders.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Children start in the Reception class with knowledge and skills that are typical for their age. The wide range of stimulating learning experiences that are provided ensures that children are happy and eager to learn. The children make consistently good and sometimes outstanding progress in all areas so that by the time they begin Year 1 their attainment is above average.  The 2012 statutory assessments showed that Year 2 pupils reached average levels of attainment in reading, writing and mathematics. Year 1 pupils’ understanding of phonics (the sounds letters make) was also assessed as similar to pupils of the same age nationally. Given their earlier attainment, these standards are not high enough.  Pupils’ current attainment and progress during Key Stage 1 are improving. More pupils are learning well and on track to reach higher standards. However, their achievement is not yet good. This is partly because some pupils are still catching up from earlier underachievement, but

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

it is also because reading, writing and mathematics are not yet taught consistently well.  Recent improvements to the provision for pupils in Year 1 have resulted in better opportunities for them to learn through meaningful activities that enhance their understanding and enjoyment. This was particularly evident in mathematics lessons where pupils undertook ‘challenges’, such as using small construction materials to build garages for different-sized toy cars.  The 2012 Year 6 test results showed that pupils’ standards in writing and mathematics were higher than the previous year and higher than those attained by pupils across the country. These results reflected that most pupils had made the expected progress from their earlier attainment at the end of Key Stage 1, and over a third did better than this. They illustrated the school’s success in addressing the previous inspection’s recommendations for improvement in

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

these two areas and the strengths in the teaching in the upper part of Key Stage 2. However, they masked the unevenness of progress within the key stage, which is still a feature.  The 2012 Year 6 reading test results were not as positive. Pupils’ attainment was lower than the previous year and lower than for pupils of the same age across the country. Boys, in particular, did not achieve well in this aspect. Currently, more pupils than previously are on track to make and exceed the expected progress in reading but there are still too many pupils, mainly at Key Stage 2, who are not making fast enough progress.  The school’s data show that the achievement of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is as variable as that of other pupils. Some are progressing very well, but others are not achieving as well as they might.  The school has been successful in reducing the gap between the attainment of pupils in receipt

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

of the pupil premium, including those known to be eligible for free school meals, and that of other pupils. In the 2011 end of Key Stage 2 tests pupils in receipt of the pupil premium were almost three years behind other pupils in reading, two years behind in mathematics and 16 months behind in writing. In the 2012 tests pupils in this group attained slightly better than other pupils in reading and were six months in front in mathematics; the gap in writing had been reduced to six months.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The overall quality of teaching is still too uneven to ensure that pupils who need to make rapid progress to eradicate earlier underachievement can do so and others can make consistently good progress to attain higher standards.  While teaching is not yet good, improvements have continued to be made. Strengths in the teaching of older pupils have been sustained, including exceptionally well taught booster lessons in literacy and mathematics for the more able pupils and those who find learning more difficult. This unfailingly high quality of teaching is promoting pupils’ rapid progress and helping to raise standards.  Although there are more examples of good and better teaching in other year groups at Key Stage 2, consistently good teaching at this key stage is not fully embedded. This is also the case at Key Stage 1, despite increasingly more examples of good teaching. Previously outstanding teaching at Key Stage 1 has been maintained.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 In the most effective lessons teachers provide work that captures pupils’ interest and expect pupils to work hard and quickly, for example to solve problems independently and as part of a group. Teachers provide just the right balance of challenge and support, adapting their questions and the work throughout the lesson to get the best out of pupils, keeping an overview of how well all pupils are doing and checking the impact of support staff so that learning never slows.  This was evident in a Year 6 lesson on Ancient Greece, in which pupils’ learning across a range of subjects was promoted exceptionally well. The teacher reminded the pupils, who were making model temples, about the mathematical ratio of the ‘Golden Rectangle’ and pupils applied this when constructing the columns to support the roof; pupils were amazed as they tested the strength of the roof to withstand increasing weights.  Where teaching is less effective at both key stages, teachers do not match work well enough to

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

pupils’ needs or use the best methods to help them learn well, including when teaching basic reading, writing and mathematics skills. In the main, this now tends to hinder the learning of particular groups, such as the more able pupils or average attainers, rather than the whole class, as previously.  At other times teachers do not make the most effective use of the lesson time. Sometimes they talk for too long or spend too much time explaining tasks, leaving too little time for productive learning. To varying degrees, this was seen in a range of subjects and was also a feature of some of the reading lessons that occur at the start of each day.  The teaching of pupils with disabilities and special educational needs now mostly occurs within lessons rather than taking small groups out of the classroom. This enables class teachers to more easily check on and support these pupils’ learning, even when their work is being led by a

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

support assistant. In some lessons this is working well and having a positive impact on promoting these pupils’ progress, but practice remains uneven.  Teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage is highly effective in promoting children’s progress and enjoyment of learning. Early reading, writing and number skills are taught very well, both in teacher-led activities and through play. For example, the children made effective use of writing materials in the class ‘vets’ and staff reinforced children’s understanding of letter sounds as they made Easter cards. Carefully chosen books captured boys’ interest and resulted in animated and extended discussions between groups. Outdoors, staff exploited the mathematical potential of a game of hoopla to develop the children’s understanding of number and addition.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils’ strongly developed moral understanding is evident in the exemplary way that they conduct themselves in lessons and at breaks and lunchtimes. They are courteous and show respect for the the adults who work with them. They work and play together well and there are few instances of inappropriate behaviour. Pupils say that they feel safe in school.  Pupils’ attitudes to learning are good. Most are keen to learn and respond enthusiastically when the work they are given motivates and challenges them. Conversely, where the work they are given is too easy, too difficult or not particularly stimulating, they lose interest and learning slows.  Pupils are very clear about the improvements that have occurred since the school was last inspected. They provided good examples to support their views that lessons are now more interesting and breaktimes are now better organised to provide more opportunities for playing

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

games or just to enjoy quieter places to chat to their friends.  The pupils have a good understanding of how to keep safe. They know about different types of bullying and the dangers of using the internet. They trust the school staff to keep them safe and to deal fairly with any instances of inappropriate behaviour that might occur.  Pupils are keen to earn the weekly awards for friendship, respect and excellence and wear their medals proudly. They are excited by the new ‘pen licence’ award and are clear about what they have to do to receive this.  Pupils are sensible and take responsibilities, such as school councillors and play leaders, seriously. They are clear about how these roles enable them to help improve things in the school and contribute to making playtimes more fun.  Attendance is in line with the national average. Most pupils are punctual and attend regularly.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 Although the headteacher was only appointed in September 2012, he has made an excellent impact on school improvement. The deputy headteacher also has significant strengths as a leader and manager. She has shown remarkable adaptability in working with the two seconded headteachers who led the school for short periods before the headteacher’s appointment. Both of the seconded headteachers contributed well to the school’s journey of improvement.  The very strong team of headteacher and deputy headteacher are providing an excellent lead in driving forward improvements. In particular, previous significant weaknesses in teaching and the leadership structure have been eliminated.  The leadership team has been restructured and the roles of new senior leaders have been developed well. They now make a very good contribution to school improvement and play a full part in checking on the quality of teaching and pupils’ learning. This has strengthened the

p.6

The leadership and management are good

school’s position to improve more quickly in the future.  Considerable planning and effort have been invested in developing the roles of subject leaders. This began from scratch because historically no subject leadership structure was in place. While these leaders have received training and are clear about their roles, not all have had the opportunity to make an impact because senior leaders have rightly prioritised securing good classroom practice first. Nevertheless, there is a clear plan for the development of these leaders and to date this has been implemented to very good effect for one subject.  Senior leaders’ detailed analyses of the assessments of pupils’ attainment and progress are used well to decide where to target support to improve teaching and learning. Currently this information is also driving the priority of ensuring more accurate identification of pupils with special educational needs and greater consistency of progress for pupils within this group .

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The new creative curriculum is developing effectively and providing some good opportunities to promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Good opportunities for art, music and learning modern foreign languages, along with a range of after-school clubs, educational visits and information technology-based homework activities, enrich the curriculum.  The school keeps pupils safe and leaders are working tirelessly to ensure that all pupils have the same good opportunities to succeed. Leaders keep parents well informed. They welcome and act upon parents’ views. Parents continue to support the school very well. They are appreciative of the hard work that has occurred to bring about improvements.  The local authority has provided very good support for the school. Weekly visits have been used effectively to validate leaders’ evaluations of teaching and learning and to provide support in a

p.6

The leadership and management are good

variety of areas, including the development of new leadership roles.  The governance of the school:  Governors question school leaders in detail about the school’s performance and as a result are well informed about pupils’ achievement and the quality of teaching. They ensure that the performance management process is used appropriately to reward good teaching and tackle underperformance.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 110996 Local authority Warrington Inspection number 409636

p.8

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Maintained Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 332 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Rachel Brougham Headteacher Dan Harding Date of previous school inspection 20 June 2011 Telephone number 01925 215640 Fax number 01925 215641 Email address StocktonHeath_Primary@warrington.gov.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion