Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Holy Family Catholic Primary School, Ingol, Preston
Summary
Jennifer Platt (lead), Emma Jackson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Mar 2013
- Inspectors verified
Emma Jackson, Jennifer Platt
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
PR2 3YP
- Name on report verified
Holy Family Catholic Primary School, Ingol, Preston
- URN verified
119611
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- Teaching is good with examples of excellent teaching, enabling pupils to make good progress. p.4
- Teaching is good with some being excellent. p.1
- There are some skilled mathematicians working at a very high standard. p.4
- This is very effective in Key Stage 2 during daily sessions that focus on basic skills. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Lower down in Key Stage 2 this challenge is not always apparent and some pupils complete limited work and are unclear about what is expected of them in the lesson. p.5
- However, there is variation in progress between classes, especially in lower Key Stage 2 when the match of work to ability is not always accurate. p.4
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
- Although writing is average, the gaps in pupils’ basic skills and handwriting are not yet fully overcome. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,097
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Holy Family Catholic Primary School, Ingol, Preston 59 Whitby Avenue, Ingol, Preston, Lancashire, PR2 3YP
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Leaders, staff and governors have successfully improved the school since the previous inspection. Changes which were new at that time are now embedded and are having a positive impact on the quality of teaching and achievement. Governors play a full role in management and ask probing questions. Achievement is good. All pupils make good progress from their low starting points. Attainment is now securely average and rising for the current Year 6 pupils. Teaching is good with some being excellent. Most lessons inspire pupils and they work hard to produce their best work. This is a welcoming school and pupils support each other. Links with the local community are strong. Pupils grow fruit and vegetables which they sell in their farm shop. They show great respect for other cultures and beliefs. Behaviour is good and pupils feel safe. The few younger pupils who have difficulty controlling
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
their behaviour are managed effectively. The headteacher and very able deputy headteacher complement each others’ skills. This leads to a caring environment that nourishes pupils’ growth alongside a focus on ensuring that all make as much progress as possible.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
There is some variation in teaching and progress between classes. Aspects of writing are weaker than others, including basic skills. Occasionally, lessons are not brisk enough and tasks do not always match closely pupils’ needs. Pupils are not always clear about what is expected of them. Resources for information and communication technology (ICT) in classrooms are limited. The outdoor area for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage is not as exciting as indoors. Leaders of subjects, other than English and mathematics, do not focus enough on the impact of their aims and actions on pupils’ progress.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching in all classes. They visited 14 lessons and parts of lessons. Meetings were held with staff, two groups of pupils, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. Pupils from different classes read to inspectors. Inspectors looked at books with a focus on writing and mathematics in Years 2, 3 and 6. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including the school’s plan for future improvements, information about pupils’ progress and safeguarding. The views of 12 parents were analysed through the online questionnaire (Parent View). Other parents shared their opinions of the school with inspectors at the start of the day. Inspectors analysed 14 returns by staff to the inspection questionnaire.
p.2
Inspection team
Jennifer Platt, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Emma Jackson Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
The school is smaller than the average-sized primary. The number of pupils from minority ethnic groups is below average. A few pupils, mainly in the Early Years Foundation Stage, are from Eastern European countries and have little spoken English. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium (additional funding provided for children in local authority care, those from service families and those known to be eligible for free school meals) is above average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action is below average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is below average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics. Several staff are new since the previous inspection. The school has achieved the National Healthy School status.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching and increase the rate of pupils’ progress to outstanding by: – improving pupils’ skills in handwriting and punctuation – ensuring all lessons go at a brisk pace and work helps pupils to learn and is matched to their level of ability – checking pupils clearly understand what is expected of them in lessons – ensuring resources for ICT are available to support learning in lessons – checking that children in the Early Years Foundation Stage experience a curriculum outdoors that is as rich as indoors. Improve the leadership of subjects, other than English and mathematics, ensuring that priorities and actions are closely linked to pupils’ progress and attainment.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Palpable warmth between staff and children in the Early Years Foundation Stage ensures children settle happily. Progress is good from starting points that are much lower than usual for this age, especially in social development and language. Most of the pupils who have English as an additional language are currently in the Early Years Foundation Stage. The focus on practical activities, the use of gestures and pictures has a significant impact on their learning. Overall, they make good progress. Progress from Year 1 to Year 6 is good. This reflects an improvement since the previous inspection and the most recent national test results. However, there is variation in progress between classes, especially in lower Key Stage 2 when the match of work to ability is not always accurate. Actions to raise attainment are reaping benefits and, combined with a stable staffing situation, ensure that improvements seen before in the Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 are
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
now evident in Key Stage 2. Although, with small cohorts, attainment varies, it is broadly average at the end of Year 2 and Year 6 in reading, writing and mathematics. Attainment is rising in Year 6. More pupils are working at above-average levels in response to high-quality teaching. There are some skilled mathematicians working at a very high standard. Reading has improved with a focus on teaching letters and their sounds. In the national assessment in reading in Year 1 in 2012 results were below the national average. Current evidence points to attainment being above average. Pupils in Year 6 enjoy reading. The gap between boys and girls has closed with a wider choice of text, humorous books being their favourite. Although writing is average, the gaps in pupils’ basic skills and handwriting are not yet fully overcome. Mathematics is much improved. Pupils in most classes solve problems confidently
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
because a consistent approach is now taught in every class. Support for pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium is good. Many attend breakfast club and get a good start to the day. This group includes pupils known to be eligible for free school meals. They make good progress, similar to that of other pupils. Attainment overall in both English and mathematics by the end of Year 6 is in line with what is expected for their age except in Year 5, which is lower. This year group has a high number of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, and support is in place to narrow the gap in their attainment. Disabled pupils, those with special educational needs and those from minority ethnic groups make good progress. Occasionally, too much help leaves pupils lacking the confidence to work independently. Staff expertise enables pupils with very specific difficulties to play a full part in
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Teaching is good with examples of excellent teaching, enabling pupils to make good progress. In the Early Years Foundation Stage the focus is on learning through play. Staff involve children in conversation and extend their social and speaking skills. The use of pictures, for example to show good listening, ensures all understand what is expected of them. The richness of activities indoors is not fully mirrored outdoors. Most lessons in the rest of the school include a variety of activities to sustain pupils’ interest. Teaching assistants provide good support. When teaching is most effective the pace is brisk. This is very effective in Key Stage 2 during daily sessions that focus on basic skills. Pupils in Year 5 and 6 completed several difficult calculations and writing in the allotted time. In some lessons the pace slows as pupils spend too much time waiting for information or working at tasks for too
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
long when they have lost interest. Robust methods to check pupils’ progress mean most teachers pitch work at the correct level for all abilities. This has raised the challenge in Year 6, with more working at above-average levels. Lower down in Key Stage 2 this challenge is not always apparent and some pupils complete limited work and are unclear about what is expected of them in the lesson. Teachers have good subject knowledge. In mathematics they teach several different methods of calculations and then insist on pupils choosing a method to solve problems. This challenges pupils to think for themselves and explain their preferred methods. Reading is taught well. Daily reading sessions enhance pupils’ ability to read for understanding. Pupils are taught successfully how to add interest to their writing. Some work in Year 6 is highly imaginative and presented beautifully. This is not consistent and punctuation and handwriting
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
are not always taught effectively. Teachers ensure pupils apply their literacy and numeracy skills well in other subjects. Opportunities for extending information and communication technology (ICT) skills are restricted by a lack of resources in classrooms.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Teachers’ management of behaviour is good and pupils behave well in lessons. A few pupils have difficulty sustaining good behaviour and this can disturb the learning of others, although this is kept to the minimum. Year 6 pupils are very keen to help other pupils. They lead singing and games activities at break times and this improves behaviour on the playground. In assemblies behaviour is very good as pupils celebrate the achievement of others. Pupils have positive attitudes to learning and older pupils say they enjoy learning much more now that teachers set them challenges that make them think. Pupils say bullying is very rare. They have a good understanding of different types of bullying, such as cyber-bullying and name-calling. Most pupils are very happy and those who spoke to the inspectors had few things they would improve. Their enjoyment is reflected in above-average attendance. Pupils feel safe and recall important messages about how to look after themselves. The school
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
council collaborated to provide a message about their school, and this is it: ‘Teachers are supportive and help us to achieve their challenges. We have a lot of friends and have achieved an anti-racism award because we show respect to others’.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
Leadership and management have improved as new roles have developed. Morale is high as staff see the effect of their hard work. The positive ethos has been sustained and all pupils are treated equally and there is no discrimination. Procedures for evaluating the school’s performance are rigorous and all know how to continue the pace of improvement. The school development plan includes the correct priorities and it is very clear how these are to be tackled. Success is easy to measure for the main literacy and numeracy priorities. This is not as clear for other subjects and actions are not closely linked to raising pupils’ progress. The deputy headteacher plays a crucial role in tracking pupils’ progress. Any lack of progress is spotted and support provided. For example, support to raise the progress of Year 5 pupils as they move into their final year is already in place. Previously weaker teaching led to underachievement. Action to resolve this was not always fast
p.5
The leadership and management are good
enough but this is not the case now. Teaching is checked regularly and staff know what needs improving. As a result, any variations are limited and tackled by support. Regular meetings review progress and staff must explain any lack of progress. However, the leaders of subjects, other than English and mathematics, do not always ensure that their key priorities and actions taken are closely linked to making improvements in pupils’ progress and attainment. Staff have targets to reach based on their teaching and pupils’ progress. Salary rewards are only allocated when targets are achieved. The curriculum is organised effectively. More attention to the interest of boys has raised their progress. A good balance of activities is clear from the outdoor nature resource, high-quality art and the keyboard concert held during the inspection. The use of ICT across the curriculum is restricted by limited resources and the outdoor space for children in the Early Years Foundation
p.5
The leadership and management are good
Stage is not as exciting as indoors. The promotion of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is very successful. Cultural development is fostered very well. Pupils understand their role in helping others, such as in raising money for the children in India who live on the streets. Links with the local authority are effective, especially in providing advice to improve teaching and offering training for staff and governors. The governance of the school: – The governors take full advantage of training to improve their role. A rigorous review of data leads to probing questions about any underachievement and evaluation about the effect of any support. Governors are determined that past mistakes will not reoccur. They visit regularly and know the overall quality of teaching. The budget is managed efficiently, including checks that salary awards are linked to teachers’ performance. Close monitoring of pupil premium
p.6
The leadership and management are good
funding ensures these pupils benefit from this support. The governing body fulfils its statutory duties, particularly ensuring that safeguarding arrangements meet requirements.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 119611 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 405872
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 151 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Alan Gaskell Headteacher Ray Sudlow Date of previous school inspection 18 May 2011 Telephone number 01772 727471 Fax number 01772 725122 Email address bursar@holy-family.lancs.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion