Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

The Sutton Academy

Inspected 15 Mar 2013 · published 22 Apr 2013 · URN 136141

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Bernard Robinson, David Woodhouse, John Dunne, Mary Liptrot, Paul Chambers

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WA9 5AU

  • Name on report verified

    The Sutton Academy

  • URN verified

    136141

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−13Mixedmore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedhigh expectationsoutstandingexcellenthighly effectiveexceptionallyfeel safepositive
Criticisminadequaterequires improvementweaknessespoornot consistentlynot alwaysbelowgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings158w+58
  • What needs to improve2013w−18

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,089
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 69%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

The Sutton Academy Elton Head Road, St Helens, Merseyside, WA9 5AU

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 While there is evidence of recent improvements, students’ progress is generally below average.  Weaknesses remain in students’ achievement in mathematics and humanities. The sixth form requires improvement.  The quality of teaching is not consistently good or better and some inadequate teaching remains.  Students’ behaviour and attitudes in lessons are not always sufficiently positive to maintain a good pace of learning.  The actions of leaders and managers, including governors, have not had sufficient impact to ensure that students across the academy make good progress.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 Students behave well around the academy, even in the difficult circumstances created by significant building work. They feel safe and are very positive about the new accommodation.  Teachers plan lessons that take account of different ability levels in the class. Students learn well when reviewing other students’ work and considering how it could be made better.  Leaders and managers have successfully improved the quality of teaching. This has led to better progress for current students and GCSE results in 2012 that were better than those in 2011.  The academy’s leaders have an accurate view of the quality of teaching and of the academy’s overall strengths and weaknesses.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 During this inspection, inspectors observed 43 lessons, including eight that were observed jointly with senior staff at the academy. They also made shorter visits to several other lessons to look at students’ books.  Inspectors held meetings with the Principal, members of the governing body, a representative of St Helens local authority, staff and students.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation, including that relating to the work of the governing body and the achievement, behaviour and safety of students. They took account of 16 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View), as well as responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.2

Inspection team

Paul Chambers, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Bernard Robinson Additional Inspector Mary Liptrot Additional Inspector David Woodhouse Additional Inspector John Dunne Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The Sutton Academy is larger than most secondary schools.  The academy is sponsored by St Helens College and Edge Hill University.  The proportion of students known to be eligible for the pupil premium (additional funding for students who are known to be eligible for free school meals, those who are looked after by the local authority and those from services families) is high compared with the national average.  The proportion of students supported through school action is above average.  The proportion of students supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is well above average.  There are more boys than girls in the academy.  Almost all students are White British.  A small number of students attend off-site provision, run by Aspire and/or Launchpad, for two or three days per week; these students attend work placements and receive training in key skills. About 50 students in each of Years 10 and 11 attend St Helens College for one day per

p.3

Information about this school

week to follow courses in hair and beauty, construction or engineering.  The academy meets the government’s current floor standards which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching further, by:  eliminating inadequate teaching  giving more emphasis to improving students’ writing and speaking skills  ensuring that more students contribute fully to the lesson.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve students’ achievement, particularly in the sixth form and in mathematics and humanities.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of students gaining the highest A* and A grades in their examinations.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that leaders and managers at all levels monitor carefully how well teachers implement policies designed to improve students’ communication and mathematical skills.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Students enter the academy with attainment that is below average. GCSE examination results are below average in most subjects and particularly so for the proportion of students gaining the highest A* and A grades.  Most progress measures are below average. In 2012, while the proportion of students making the expected progress in English broadly matched the national picture, the corresponding figure in mathematics was much lower. Few students made progress that exceeded national expectations. Students following humanities subjects make less progress than similar students in other schools.  Inspection evidence, supported by robust data provided by the school, indicates that current students are making better progress than those who have recently completed their examinations.  The achievement of disabled students and those with special educational needs, like other groups, requires improvement. School data show that current students receiving extra support

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

are making better progress in English than mathematics.  The gap between the average point score (a measure of attainment) of those known to be eligible for the pupil premium and other students in English has been less than the national figure for each of the last two years, and narrowed in 2012. In mathematics, the gap was wider than the national figure in 2011 but narrower in 2012.  Leaders have identified that, in 2012, some of the students attending courses at St Helens College did not achieve sufficiently well. They have ensured that current students are following suitable courses that they are on track to gain appropriately demanding qualifications.  Students’ achievement in the sixth form requires improvement. In 2012, A-level students made inadequate progress; inspection evidence suggests that current students are making better progress but this has yet to be established as a clear pattern over time.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 While the majority of teaching seen during the inspection was good or better, a substantial minority of teaching requires improvement and some inadequate teaching remains. Inspectors saw more good teaching in Key Stage 4 and in the sixth form than in Key Stage 3. Evidence from joint lesson observations suggests that the academy’s leaders have an accurate view of the quality of teaching; moreover, the proportion of good or better teaching seen during the inspection is broadly in line with the academy’s own records.  Teachers form good relationships with students and most lessons take place in a calm atmosphere. They plan activities that take account of the different abilities in the class. In many cases, they help students’ learning by giving them opportunities to review other students’ work and assess it against set criteria.  Where teaching is strongest, the students are actively engaged and contribute significantly to

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

their own learning, teachers demonstrate good subject knowledge and have high expectations of what students can achieve. For example, in a Year 7 music lesson, the teacher’s high expectations helped to maintain an excellent pace of learning; all students were fully involved and worked together well to produce a four-person percussion piece in limited time.  In weaker lessons, teachers focus their planning on teaching rather than students’ learning. As a result, students have few opportunities to discuss and develop their ideas. Where teaching is less inspiring, some students are reluctant to volunteer answers or respond in detail to set tasks.  Teachers are aware of their responsibility to develop students’ language, communication and mathematical skills in their subject teaching. For example, inspectors saw examples of teachers encouraging students to read and giving opportunities for extended writing. However, in some

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

lessons, teachers miss opportunities to develop students’ writing or speaking skills or their use of technical vocabulary. Across the curriculum, evidence of the academy’s focus on language and communication is more evident than its focus on mathematics.

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

 While most students are cooperative in lessons, a minority lack the drive and enthusiasm needed to do their very best.  Students behave well around the academy; they move calmly between lessons and make good use of the social areas offered by the academy’s new accommodation. They dress smartly and show good personal qualities.  The number of exclusions from the academy is low and staff have successfully reduced the number of incidents of poor behaviour that require intervention. However, inspection evidence, including from the academy’s records and responses to the staff questionnaire, indicate that some poor behaviour remains.  Students feel safe in the academy. They know about different forms of bullying and say that bullying rarely takes place. They know who to turn to if they feel vulnerable or other students make them unhappy.  Attendance is below average. More students are persistently absent than in most schools. The

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

academy has devoted considerable resources to improving attendance and recent figures indicate that they are beginning to have an impact.  Students who attend provision run by Aspire and/or Launchpad appreciate the opportunity to undertake work experience and gain basic skills in a non-school setting. Some report that the alternative provision has helped them to improve their attendance and behaviour. The academy makes appropriate arrangements for monitoring the well-being and attendance of all students attending lessons and training off-site.

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

 While students’ achievement has improved overall, achievement in mathematics and humanities is still not as good as it should be. Nevertheless, in 2012, mathematics results improved and considerably more students achieved the expected progress than previously.  Leaders and managers are aware that recent provision and outcomes in the sixth form have not been good enough and that, in 2012, results in the sixth form did not show the same improvement as results at GCSE. They have responded by strengthening leadership and providing better information, advice and guidance for students entering the sixth form. As a result, more students are suitably qualified for the courses they are following, attendance is better and more students are persevering with their studies.  The Principal, supported by a revamped senior team, has a clear vision for how the academy can improve. His drive and commitment have helped to tackle underperformance and have

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

generated a positive attitude among staff: staff responding to the inspection questionnaire say they are proud to work at the academy and know what they are trying to achieve.  Senior leaders are realistic in their evaluation of the academy. They recognise where improvements are needed and have appropriate plans to improve provision further. Staff responsible for subject areas are increasingly accountable for the quality of teaching and students’ achievement in their areas of responsibility. Leaders and managers at all levels need to ensure that policies to improve students’ communication and literacy skills are applied consistently.  Leaders have allocated the pupil premium funding in a range of areas, including additional staffing to support literacy development and to ensure that the curriculum meets students’ individual needs. They have monitored the impact of the additional funding on the performance

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

of the eligible students but have undertaken less analysis of whether attainment gaps have narrowed. However, the academy’s careful monitoring of the performance of different groups demonstrates a suitable commitment to promoting equality of opportunity.  The curriculum in Key Stage 3 includes planned opportunities for students to develop their study skills and reflect on how they learn most effectively. In Key Stage 4, students can select from an appropriate range of academic and work-related options. The range of courses offered in the sixth form generally meets students’ needs but remains under review. After-school activities, many based around the academy’s sports specialism, help students to develop their personal qualities, such as working with others. The time allocated to morning registration is not always used effectively.  The use of early entry for GCSE examinations may have contributed to more students gaining

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

grade Cs, without a corresponding increase in the proportion of students gaining the highest A* and A grades. This year, the academy has reduced the numbers of students entered early.  The small number of parents who completed the online questionnaire have mixed views of the academy, although almost all agree that the academy keeps them well informed about the progress their children are making. One parent raised an issue concerning provision in the sixth form and this was raised, in confidence, with the Principal.  In-school programmes to develop teaching further are well organised and have had an impact on increasing the proportion of good or better teaching. A focus on catering for the needs of different abilities within the class has led to improved practice in the classroom, especially in Key Stage 4. Where teaching is not consistently good or better, teachers are given additional support and/or clear targets for improvement. Pay rises are only approved for those staff who can

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

demonstrate strong classroom performance.  The academy’s sponsors provide a range of support. For example, St Helens College has provided support for developing the curriculum in computer science and vocational subjects in the sixth form; Edge Hill University offers support for mathematics staffing and contributes to sixth form students’ enrichment time through the Tomorrow’s Teachers scheme. The academy retains connections with St Helens local authority and, in consequence, benefits from the authority’s expertise and links with other local schools.  The governance of the school:  Governors are knowledgeable and well informed about the academy. They provide suitable support and challenge and accept that the academy needs to improve students’ achievement at GCSE and in the sixth form. They have a good understanding of the academy’s priorities for improvement. They know where teaching is strongest and where it is weakest and ensure that

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

additional pay is awarded to teachers only after a successful review of performance. Governors have kept track of the academy’s finances through a time of considerable change in accommodation and staffing. They recognise the purpose of the pupil premium funding, but currently monitoring of its impact does not focus sufficiently on the attainment gaps with other groups.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 136141 Local authority Not Applicable Inspection number 399819

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Academy sponsor-led School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1309 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 169 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jette Burford Headteacher David Terry Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01744 678859 Fax number 01744 678860 Email address dave.terry@thesuttonacademy.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion