Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Susan Gregory
- URN verified
EY391311
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the inspection visit the childminder has made satisfactory progress in meeting the notice to improve. p.1
- The childminder ensures all children are taken to collect other children from school and no child is left unsupervised in the car. p.1
- The childminder has reviewed her collection and drop off policy and has amended her risk assessments for school/nursery runs. p.1
- The childminder has made satisfactory improvement. p.1
- The next visit will be a full inspection. p.1
- I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your childminding service. p.1
- If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter. p.1
- Susan Gregory HMI National Director, Inspection Delivery p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 246
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom: 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Outcome of monitoring visit for provision judged as inadequate
An Ofsted inspector, Dawn Woodhouse-wykes, carried out a monitoring visit of your provision on 25/03/2013. This visit follows on from your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
As a result of our inspection on 04/02/2013, we sent you a notice to improve.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
The notice to improve required you to ensure that procedures for safeguarding children are robust and safe, with particular regard to carrying younger children in the car when collecting children from school.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
Having considered all the evidence, the inspector is of the opinion that at this time you are making satisfactory improvement overall.
p.1
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
Since the inspection visit the childminder has made satisfactory progress in meeting the notice to improve. The childminder ensures all children are taken to collect other children from school and no child is left unsupervised in the car. The childminder has reviewed her collection and drop off policy and has amended her risk assessments for school/nursery runs.
p.1
Next steps
Having considered all the evidence the inspector is of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Next steps
The childminder has made satisfactory improvement. The next visit will be a full inspection. I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your childminding service. If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter.
p.1
Next steps
Susan Gregory HMI National Director, Inspection Delivery
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion