Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Linda Killman
- Postcode verified
SG13 8DR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school is aiming for its effectiveness to be at least good with an aspirational goal for it to be outstanding. p.1
- The proportions of outstanding teaching and for pupils’ to exceed expected progress are not specified as percentages in the plans. p.1
- specify, in percentages, the targets for outstanding teaching and for pupils to exceed expected progress. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 606
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alison Pepper Headteacher Morgans Primary School & Nursery Morgans Road Hertford SG13 8DR
p.1
Education act 2005 to Morgans Primary School & Nursery
Following my visit to your school on 19 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Morgans Primary School & Nursery
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, members for the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The headteacher conducted HMI on a short tour of the school. The school’s action plans were evaluated.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection two teachers have left the school. These have been replaced by one permanent teacher and another on a temporary contract. There are no other significant changes in the school’s context.
p.1
Main findings
The school is pressing ahead with its action plans, which are clearly focused on accelerating pupils’ progress through consistently good and better teaching. Tight deadlines for the completion of actions are set to secure rapid improvement. The school is aiming for its effectiveness to be at least good with an aspirational goal for it to be outstanding. Targets for consistently good teaching and for pupils to make Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T :0121 679 9164 Direct email : tim.ogbourn@serco.com expected progress are high at 100%. The proportions of outstanding teaching and for pupils’ to exceed expected progress are not specified as percentages in the plans. Leaders responsible for making actions happen are separated from those checking that learning improves so that evaluations are impartial. Leaders at all
p.1
Main findings
levels and the local authority are tracking the school’s progress diligently. They are holding staff to account ensuring that there is no slippage in implementing the plan. Middle leaders have a remit to achieve consistently good teaching and learning across their designated year groups. Common approaches in teaching pupils to write are resulting in their better progress.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body has raised expectations for its own effectiveness. It has devised and implemented an action plan to develop governors’ skills in challenging school leaders and helping them to raise standards. While the governing body expects school leaders to provide it with accurate information on teaching and learning, it also seeks evidence of improvements independently. Pupil premium funding is allocated to accomplish better outcomes for those pupils who are most at risk of underachievement and their progress is checked.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommends that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
specify, in percentages, the targets for outstanding teaching and for pupils to exceed expected progress.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school with a light touch until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school draws readily upon the local authority’s expertise. Not a month passes without some involvement from its advisers and consultants to improve teaching and raise pupils’ achievement. The headteacher welcomes the high level of challenge that the improvement adviser provides. Governors benefit from good-quality training and clerking of governing body meetings.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Education for Hertfordshire.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion