Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Buxton School

Inspected 13 Mar 2013 · published 18 Apr 2013 · URN 103080

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Mayle (lead), Clifford Walker, David Gutmann, Kanwaljit Singh, Veronica Young

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Mayle, Clifford Walker, David Gutmann, Kanwaljit Singh, Veronica Young

  • Postcode verified

    E11 3NN

  • Name on report verified

    Buxton School

  • URN verified

    103080

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progressvery wellgood progresseffectiveimprovedwell plannedeffectively
Criticismnot alwaysinadequaterequires improvementnot yetseriousweaknessesbelowweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1392w+55
  • Leadership617w+26
  • What needs to improve100w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,034
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%Leadership 20%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Buxton School Cann Hall Road, London, E11 3NN

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Students’ achievement is good. Their progress has improved since the previous inspection and is now good throughout the school.  As the result of the good support they receive, disabled students and those who have special educational needs achieve well.  Those students eligible for support through pupil premium funding also achieve well, as do those who speak English as an additional language.  The quality of teaching is good, and sometimes of high quality. Leaders check its quality regularly to be sure that students are learning as well as possible.  Behaviour is good in lessons and around the school. Students are polite and courteous. They respect each other and have good relationships with staff, so that the school is a calm and orderly place where students feel safe.  Attendance has improved since the previous inspection and is now at least average across the school.  Children make a good start in the Nursery and

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

Reception classes, where teaching is good.  Leaders, managers and governors are fully committed to making sure that the school provides a good quality of education. They know the strengths of the school as well as what needs to be done to improve the school further.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Occasionally, students are not set work at the right level of difficulty. They are not always able to use their own initiative and make choices in their learning.  Students are not always provided with time in lessons to respond to teachers’ written comments and improve their work as a result.  Students’ progress in mathematics at Key Stage 4 is not as rapid as that in English.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 48 parts of lessons. Some observations were carried out jointly with the executive headteacher, headteachers and members of the senior leadership team.  In addition, the inspection team made a number of short visits to lessons, attended an assembly, observed behaviour at lunchtime and at breaks, spoke to students, listened to younger pupils read and scrutinised their work.  Meetings were held with the executive headteacher, members of the senior leadership team, some heads of department and subject coordinators, members of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and groups of students.  Inspectors observed the school at work and looked at a wide range of documents, including the school’s own self-evaluation, assessment data from the monitoring of pupils’ progress, improvement plans and minutes from meetings of the governing body. School policies and

p.2

Information about this inspection

records relating to behaviour, safety and attendance, together with the school’s safeguarding procedures, were also evaluated.  Inspectors took into account of 42 responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View), several letters from parents and 65 questionnaires completed by staff, as well as the school’s own parental and student surveys.

p.2

Inspection team

Christine Mayle, Lead inspector Additional Inspector David Gutmann Additional Inspector Kanwaljit Singh Additional Inspector Clifford Walker Additional Inspector Veronica Young Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is larger than the average-sized school of similar type.  It is part of The Buxton School Learning Trust in partnership with The University of East London, Waltham Forest local authority and the National Health Service, together with the Jenny Hammond Primary School and Acacia Nursery.  The school has a specialism in science.  Since the previous inspection the school has undergone significant changes in staffing, predominantly the appointment of a new executive headteacher in January 2012. There are also separate heads of school for the primary and secondary age groups.  The school has a specialist resource provision for 12 pupils with speech, language and communication needs.  The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is significantly higher than average, as is the proportion for whom English is an additional language.  An above average number of pupils joins or leaves the school from Reception to Year 11.

p.3

Information about this school

 The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs who are supported at school action is above average.  The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is well above average.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium (additional funding for those eligible for free school meals, looked after children and those with a parent in the armed services) is well above average.  The school does not use any alternative provision for its students.  The school meets the government’s current floor targets, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching from good to outstanding by:  making sure that all teachers set work at the right level of difficulty and challenge for all students  providing more opportunities for students to use their initiative and make choices in their learning  giving students time in lessons to read and respond to teachers’ written feedback.  Accelerate students’ progress in mathematics at Key Stage 4, so that it is at least as good as that in English, by planning activities that encourage students to apply their mathematical learning across a range of topics and subjects.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Since the previous inspection, improvements in teaching and the way subjects are planned throughout the school have led to students making good progress from when they enter in Nursery to when they leave in Year 11.  Many children enter the school with skills well below those expected for their age. All children make good progress in the Nursery and Reception classes as they are taught well and given interesting activities to take part in.  Although pupils enter Year 1 with levels of attainment that are below average, they quickly acquire knowledge, skills and understanding, particularly in reading, writing and numeracy. They make good progress throughout Key Stages 1 and 2 to reach standards that are broadly average by the end of Year 6.  The school’s robust assessment information shows that pupils currently in Year 6 are on track to meet or exceed average standards. This was confirmed in the lessons observed and in pupils’

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

books.  The teaching of letters and sounds (phonics) is well planned so that pupils acquire good reading skills. Pupils enjoy reading and are happy talking about the books they have read.  While below average, attainment at the end of Year 11 shows a rising trend over the last three years. However, last year, mathematics results were weaker than those in English. This year the school entered Year 11 students early for GCSE mathematics and the results have risen sharply. Together with the continuing rise in English performance, this shows good progress.  Disabled students and those who have special educational needs make at least the same and often better progress than their peers. Students in the specialist resource base, with speech, language and communication needs, also make good progress and achieve as well as other pupils in the school with disabilities and special educational needs.  Those students known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium funding make better

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

progress than their peers in school. By end of Year 6 and Year 11 the gap between their average point scores in English and mathematics and those of students not eligible for the pupil premium funding nationally is narrowing.  There are no significant differences in the achievement of students from different ethnic groups. The achievement of students with English as an additional language, many of whom join the school part way through the year, is very good. The support they receive helps them to quickly develop their communication skills.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Since the appointment of the new executive headteacher the school has focused on improving the quality of teaching so it is now good and sometimes outstanding. As they want their students to be successful learners, staff have made good use of support and training to make their teaching better.  Teachers have good subject knowledge, use questioning effectively and regularly check that students understand what they are doing. They also build positive relationships with students that increase students’ self-esteem. Students say they enjoy school and appreciate the help they receive. Support staff make a good contribution to students’ learning and progress.  Where teaching is most effective, students are fully engaged in creative and practical learning activities that stretch them. Timed activities keep students focused on their work and they learn at a rapid rate. For example, in a science lesson, students learnt about plant and animal cells. A

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

combination of timed written tasks, students researching information for themselves, the teacher’s quick-fire questioning, a quiz and practical work, all helped students to learn at the right pace for them. The work was interesting and engaged the students, so they made outstanding progress.  Students’ work is marked regularly and teachers’ written comments help students to understand where they have been successful and what they need to do next to make their work better. Sometimes, students respond to the written comments that teachers make on their work but this is not yet consistent across the whole school or between subjects as students are not always given the time to consider this feedback.  Occasionally, students are not given enough opportunities to use their own initiative and learn on their own. Where teaching is less effective, work is not set at the right level of difficulty and there are missed chances for students to apply their learning, particularly in mathematics, in a

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

variety of situations.  In the Nursery and Reception classes activities are well planned and involve a range of resources that excite children in their learning. Children are encouraged to develop their use of language and number through play. Adult-led activities give all children targeted support and, as a result, they learn well.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Behaviour in lessons and around the school is good. Between lessons, students’ safe and mature attitudes in sometimes crowded corridors and outdoor spaces reflect their sense of responsibility and respect for others very well.  A strong feature of the school is the way in which students get on well together. Students of all ages, from a range of backgrounds and cultures, are well supported, settle in quickly and make friends. They are polite, well mannered and courteous.  Attendance rates have improved since the last inspection. These are now average for primary students and above average for older students. Exclusions have fallen rapidly. This reflects the extended work the school does with families and the local community. Parents and carers are welcome in the school and the feedback from them indicates that they hold the school in high regard. For example, one parent wrote, ‘I feel extremely lucky to have my son attending Buxton,

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

a mainstream school where all his special needs are catered for and it’s a place he loves to come to.’  Students are keen to learn and this helps them to concentrate in lessons and make good progress. They do not always have the confidence to take risks in their learning and push it forward for themselves as they are not consistently given the opportunity to make choices.  Students say they feel safe and understand the various forms of bullying, including cyber bullying and that related to prejudice. They know what to do should such incidents occur and they are confident that the adults will sort these out quickly and effectively.  Students respond very well to the range of responsibilities they take on, such as prefect duties, raising monies for charity, and being part of the school council or the junior leadership team.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 The executive headteacher provides uncompromising leadership. She is passionate about teaching and is determined for all students to succeed. She is well supported by her senior leadership team, who share her commitment to improve all aspects of the school’s performance.  Well-developed systems are in place for leaders at all levels to check on the quality of the school’s work. These are clearly linked to the targets set for teachers, their pay and career progression. Training is matched closely to teachers’ needs.  Improvement planning correctly identifies the priorities for the school. The drive to improve teaching and achievement since the last inspection has been effective so that both are now good. The school’s own evaluation of its performance is accurate.  Students were entered early for mathematics for the first time this year and the results show a significant improvement in their attainment and progress. However, students are not allowed to

p.5

The leadership and management are good

drop the subject if their examination grade is lower than the school’s target for them. Students also take IGCSE English early and this is having a similar effect. The school is keeping their early entry policy under review.  Students across the school benefit from a wide range of activities that engage their interest. The school offers students a good range of subject choices at Key Stage 4. Students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness is developed well through subjects and the activities provided. Displays around the school provide good evidence of the varied work students do in this area.  Equality of opportunity permeates throughout the school and discrimination is tackled robustly. The school uses its pupil premium funding effectively to provide a range of extra adult support for eligible students. As a result, they are making better than expected progress.  All statutory requirements are met relating to safeguarding.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The local authority has provided effective support for the school.  The governance of the school:  Governors demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the school’s performance, the quality of teaching, performance management systems and pay progression. They know what is done to reward good teachers and to tackle underperformance. They hold leaders to account by asking challenging questions on all aspects of the school’s work. The financial budget is managed well. Governors have a good understanding of how the pupil premium money is used to support eligible students and know that these students are making good progress. They are fully supportive of the executive headteacher and staff in their drive to raise standards.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 103080 Local authority Waltham Forest Inspection number 404853

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school All-through School category Foundation Age range of pupils 3–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1,396 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jo Durning Headteacher Kath Wheeler Date of previous school inspection 24–25 May 2013 Telephone number 0208 534 3563 Fax number 0208 534 2641 Email address office@buxtonschool.waltham.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion