Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Apr 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alan Taylor-Bennett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alan Taylor-Bennett

  • Postcode verified

    SL3 9JQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserapid progressstrongsuccessfuleffectivelyimprovingclearconsistent
Criticismyet tonot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings275w0
  • Leadership733w+49

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,008
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
29 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 27%Leadership 71%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Mrs S Rowson Headteacher Churchmead Church of England (VA) School Priory Way Datchet Slough Berkshire SL3 9JQ

p.1

(VA) School

Following my visit to your school on Tuesday 19 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

(VA) School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in November 2012.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with you, other members of the senior team, the seconded headteacher from a neighbouring school, the Chair of the new Interim Executive Board (IEB) who also represents the local diocese, the interim head of education and childcare in the local authority, and a local authority secondary adviser who is working closely with the school. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plans were evaluated. Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email : Klara.Davies@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Context

Following the previous inspection in November 2012 the local authority suspended the governing body’s right to a delegated budget, the headteacher resigned and you became acting headteacher until summer 2013, and the governing body was replaced with an IEB. The local authority also took action to have greater power over staffing and exercised its right to require the governing body, and subsequently the IEB, to enter into arrangements with a view to securing improvements in the performance of the school. Consideration is being given to the school’s conversion to academy status.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority has taken swift and decisive action since the publication of the previous inspection report to enable the school to move forward. This includes the secondment of an experienced headteacher from a local successful school to offer strategic oversight, a reorganisation of the school’s senior team, the dissolution of the governing body and its replacement with an IEB, and the support of a secondary adviser for three days per week to assist with the development of teaching and learning. These actions have resulted in rapid changes and a new, but already palpable, sense of momentum.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

A senior member of the local authority chairs a strategy group which meets fortnightly and maintains close oversight of how improvement strategies are making a difference to the quality of education of students in every year group. This group holds you and your senior staff closely to account for driving these improvements. They oversaw the formulation of the local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action planning which, as a consequence, are both very thorough and well-focused documents and are also usefully aligned. The new Interim Executive Board has yet to have its first meeting but the chair is already closely involved in school improvement strategies and works cooperatively with the local authority and with school staff. There is a good representation of skills and experience among this new group. Plans to turn the school into an academy are in the early stages of discussion; key

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

stakeholders are involved and they are clear that the best interests of students and the community are paramount in any such decision.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The seconded headteacher has given the school’s senior team a sense of strategic oversight which it previously lacked. The skills and capacity of the team are now being marshalled effectively towards common and appropriate ends as everyone is beginning to understand how their work complements that of their colleagues and contributes to better standards. Levels of accountability of staff are improving; staff are beginning to be held to account for all aspects of their work, including their performance. New systems to improve the quality of teaching have been introduced by the seconded headteacher and are already being operated with thoroughness and consistency by the senior team. There is a new-found security in judgements of the quality of teaching, and much stronger links are forming between these judgements and with meeting individuals’ and teams’ needs. These changes in the expectations of the conduct and performance of staff are improving morale.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The needs of the significant number of students arriving at times other than the start of Year 7, some with specific social and learning needs, are being re-evaluated with an expansion in the work of the Personalised Learning Centre and a shift in its emphasis from simply meeting the social needs of new students, to enabling them to make rapid progress as quickly as possible. Strategies have been put in place to ensure that marking is done with more consistency by all teachers, so that students can benefit from a more consistent approach to feedback. There are plans to institute a similarly strong response to the need to drive up students’ standards of literacy and the quality of their presentation of written work. The urgent need to address a legacy of underachievement in Year 11 is recognised, and their examination success is being given high priority; there is a range of intervention and support strategies in place for

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

these students to support them to do as well as possible this summer.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Parents are being kept informed of developments in the school by a 6 weekly newsletter and the opportunity for individual meetings with you every week. Parents are not yet involved strategically in moving the school forward, but the local authority and the seconded headteacher are conscious of the significant role they will play at the appropriate time.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made: the local authority statement of action is fit for purpose; the school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose; the school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection, with the single exception agreed.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Interim Executive Board, the Director of Children’s Services for Windsor and Maidenhead, and the Director of Education for the Diocese of Oxford. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion