Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Hampton Primary School
Summary
Margaret Coussins (lead), Clifford Walker, Joanna Jones, Jon Carter
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Dec 2012
- Inspectors verified
Clifford Walker, Joanna Jones, Jon Carter, Margaret Coussins
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CT6 8NB
- Name on report verified
Hampton Primary School
- URN verified
137961
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- There is a good focus on developing children’s language, communication and number skills and relationships are strong so children are happy and settled into the routines of the day. p.4
- The headteacher is a highly effective leader. p.5
- High expectations for teaching, learning and achievement have led to improved outcomes for pupils. p.5
- The headteacher leads the school exceptionally well. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- phonics teaching need to be more finely tuned to more effectively meet the needs of all abilities. p.4
- They are confident that should any issues arise, they could tell their teachers and things would be dealt with quickly and fairly. p.5
- Leaders at all levels, including the governing body, are very clear about the school’s strengths and what it needs to do next. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,157
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Hampton Primary School Fitzgerald Avenue, Herne Bay, Kent, CT6 8NB
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. The headteacher leads the school exceptionally well. Pupils achieve well. Progress is generally good overall for most pupils from their starting points and they reach broadly average attainment in English and mathematics by the time they leave at the end of Year 6. Standards in English and mathematics have risen and are improving further. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make similar progress to others. Teaching is good and some is outstanding. Good relationships between teachers and pupils helps pupils learn well. Pupils behave well in lessons and around the school. They have positive attitudes to learning and enjoy coming to school. Pupils say they feel safe in school that they are not aware of any bullying and that adults take good care of them. Leadership and management are good. Regular and thorough checks are made on the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders quickly identify and support any teaching that does not meet their high expectations. The governing body supports the school well. It is involved in effective monitoring of the school’s work and planning for its future. Parents are very supportive of the school and feel their children are happy and well looked after.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
There is not enough outstanding teaching and so not enough pupils are making more than the expected progress. Teachers do not always have the same high standards for pupils’ basic skills when they use them to learn in subjects other than English and mathematics. Teachers do not always check pupils’ work in other subjects with the same rigour as they do in English and mathematics. Not enough checks are made on pupils’ understanding throughout some lessons to ensure that pupils are making the best possible progress.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 34 lessons or part lessons, including some joint observations with the headteacher and the deputy headteacher. In addition, inspectors made shorter visits to some classes and listened to some pupils read. Meetings were held with the headteacher, the deputy and assistant headteachers, staff with key leadership responsibilities, groups of pupils and governors. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a range of documentation including the school’s self-evaluation, the school improvement plan, records of pupils’ progress and attainment and the safeguarding arrangements. Inspectors took account of 31 responses to the online Parent View survey as well as 42 questionnaires returned by staff and the school’s own recent surveys of pupils, staff and parents.
p.2
Inspection team
Margaret Coussins, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Clifford Walker Additional Inspector Jon Carter Additional Inspector Joanna Jones Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Hampton Primary became an academy school in April 2012. When its predecessor school was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be satisfactory overall. It is larger than the average-sized primary school. Most pupils are of White British heritage. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported at school action is average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average. The proportion of pupils for whom the school receives additional funding (the pupil premium), because they are known to be eligible for free school meals, is average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The school makes provision for the Early Years Foundation Stage in three Reception classes. The school uses no alternative provision.
p.3
Information about this school
The school provides a breakfast and an after-school club.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve pupils’ progress through increasing the proportion of outstanding teaching by: ensuring that teachers have similarly high expectations of pupils’ reading, writing and mathematics when used in other subjects ensuring that there is the same level of rigour in checking pupils’ work in all other subjects as that seen in English and mathematics improving teachers’ skills in identifying where they need to intervene in lessons to have an even greater impact so that more pupils make better-than-expected progress.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Children start at the school with skills and knowledge that are below the expected levels for their age. They get a good start to school in the Reception classes and achieve well because they make good and sometimes better progress in meeting the expected goals for learning by the time they start in Year 1. Most pupils continue to make good progress overall throughout Years 1 to 6, although it is sometimes a little uneven for different classes. In the 2012 assessments at the end of Year 2, pupils made good progress from their below-average starting points but the proportion of pupils reaching the higher Level 3 was significantly below average. In 2012, by the end of Year 6, attainment was considerably higher than in previous years and pupils’ work in lessons and in their books shows that they are on track to sustain this improvement. The proportion of pupils reaching Level 4 and the higher Level 5 in both English and mathematics was above that found
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
nationally, and notably so in mathematics at Level 5. Reading is promoted well. More-able older pupils are fluent expressive readers who can state preferences for favourite authors and styles of writing and use skills of inference and deduction to help them make sense of a text. Pupils in Key Stage 1 have a secure knowledge of phonics (linking letters to the sounds they make), which helps them read unfamiliar words. However, in the Year 1 phonic screening test in 2012, taken by the current Year 2 pupils, the proportion achieving the expected results was below that found nationally. The school took this very seriously and thoroughly investigated the reasons. Its analysis revealed that many pupils who scored below the expected level were good readers who were trying to make the made-up words into real words as they were striving to ‘make them make sense’. Nevertheless, the school has correctly identified that groups for
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
phonics teaching need to be more finely tuned to more effectively meet the needs of all abilities. All groups, including disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs and those supported by the pupil premium funding, make similar progress because their needs are identified at an early stage and they are given effective support.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Lessons are generally fun and interesting and engage pupils well, giving them lots of opportunities to learn through practical activities. For example, pupils in Year 1 learning about rhyming in poems each had a word on a card and moved around the class to find someone who had the appropriate rhyming word. The school values are embedded in the teaching approaches across the school. For example, teaching gives pupils many opportunities to learn through collaborative working, which pupils do well because of their good behaviour and attitudes. This was seen to good effect in a Year 5 English lesson where pupils worked well together to discuss the features of persuasive writing. Teachers promote a good work ethic and pupils want to do well and work hard. Many teachers are very skilled at checking on pupils’ understanding and progress throughout a lesson and adapt the lesson to ensure that pupils make the best possible progress. This is not
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
consistent, however, in all classes and can slow the progress of some pupils. Teachers often give timed deadlines to activities so that the pace of learning is good, as seen in a Year 6 mathematics lesson on probability and in many other lessons where pupils worked rapidly to ‘beat the clock’. Teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage successfully encourages children’s independence. There is a good focus on developing children’s language, communication and number skills and relationships are strong so children are happy and settled into the routines of the day. Marking in English and mathematics books is regular and usually helpful in providing pupils with useful pointers about how to improve their work, and pupils often have opportunities to evaluate their own progress at the end of lessons. In other subjects, marking is sometimes not as informative and useful to pupils. Teachers do not always apply the same rigour to sharing high
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
expectations through marking and giving feedback to pupils about how well they use their basic skills in other subjects. As a consequence, pupils do not always apply their knowledge as well as they might.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils are proud of their school and enjoy the responsibilities they are given, such as prefects and school council members. Pupils are friendly, kind and polite to each other and adults. They are caring and considerate and demonstrate this well when playing together in the playground, where they need very little intervention from adults to maintain their good behaviour. Most parents who used the online questionnaire and those who responded to the school’s own survey feel that behaviour is good. Inspection findings support this view that pupils behave well in lessons and around the school, and records show that this is typical of behaviour over time. In a small number of lessons, however, where teaching does not fully engage pupils, some become distracted and inattentive and this can slow the progress they make. Good behaviour and positive attitudes make a considerable contribution to the good progress
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
pupils make. There is a consistent approach by all staff to managing behaviour and pupils are fully aware of the expectations for good behaviour. Attendance is average but improving as the school has worked effectively with parents to reduce the percentage of pupils with persistent absences. Pupils and their parents say pupils feel safe in school. In discussions, pupils clearly understood that there are different types of bullying but said there was none in school. They have, however, a good awareness that bullying can take different forms including cyber-bullying and prejudiced- based bullying. They are confident that should any issues arise, they could tell their teachers and things would be dealt with quickly and fairly.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The headteacher is a highly effective leader. She has built a strong team of staff who share her ambition and determination to provide the best possible learning experiences for pupils, whatever their backgrounds or learning needs, and a close partnership with parents. She has the confidence of staff, who are proud of the school. Comments from teachers typically focus on the strong teamwork and the supportive ethos in the school. Parents also agree that the school is well led and managed. High expectations for teaching, learning and achievement have led to improved outcomes for pupils. Leaders at all levels, including the governing body, are very clear about the school’s strengths and what it needs to do next. Rigorous systems are in place to track pupils’ attainment and progress. All teachers know they are accountable for pupils’ progress as part of the process for setting targets for their professional development. Decisions on pay and salary progression are closely linked to how well
p.5
The leadership and management are good
teachers improve the progress for pupils in their class. There are high expectations for the quality of teaching. Teaching is checked regularly by leaders, who provide good support to colleagues to improve provision, develop new ideas and evaluate the outcomes for pupils. The school values are embedded within the curriculum, underpin the work of the school at every level and promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. The school’s ethos of valuing pupils’ opinions, beliefs, cultures and backgrounds makes sure that there are equal opportunities for all. The subjects taught give appropriate emphasis to learning basic skills. There are some good opportunities for pupils to use their reading, writing, communication and mathematical skills across different subjects but sometimes teachers do not expect the same level of competence for these basic skills as they do in English and mathematics lessons. Visits and visitors to the
p.5
The leadership and management are good
school and special event days, such as the ‘Fire Day’ for Year 3 pupils held during the inspection, based on their history work on the Great Fire of London, inspire and motivate pupils, help to enrich learning and broaden pupils’ experiences. Parents and pupils appreciate the breakfast and after-school clubs, which provide a good start and finish to the school day for those pupils who participate. Safeguarding arrangements meet all statutory requirements and are well known and implemented by all staff to ensure that pupils feel safe in school. The governance of the school: Governors and the academy’s trustees know the school’s strengths and areas for development. The governing body is fully committed to improving the school and sustaining the improvement in pupils’ achievement, as well as its own effectiveness, through appropriate training and development. Governors are involved in checking the school’s work and
p.6
The leadership and management are good
understand the data that shows how well the school is doing compared to similar schools. They challenge as well as support the school and hold it to account for pupils’ achievement. They are well informed by the headteacher and have a good understanding of the quality of teaching. They check teachers’ performance and ensure that the salary structure is closely linked to pupils’ progress. Governors agree spending decisions, including the pupil premium funding, to ensure that it is carefully tailored to meet the needs of pupils’ academic and personal skills. These include providing extra equipment such as iPads, additional teaching assistant support, one-to-one support for behaviour, self-esteem and emotional difficulties and support to ensure that all pupils are able to participate in enrichment and extra activities. They ask questions about the impact of spending decisions on the outcomes for all pupils but not
p.6
The leadership and management are good
specifically the outcomes of the pupil premium funding.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 137961 Local authority Kent Inspection number 406689
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 458 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Emily Coleman Headteacher Yvonne Nunn Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01227 372159 Fax number 01227 741549 Email address headteacher@hampton.kent.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion