Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Manorfield Church of England Primary School Stoney Stanton

Inspected 13 Mar 2013 · published 10 Apr 2013 · URN 120161

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Michael Phipps (lead), Elizabeth Needham, Ian Hart

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Elizabeth Needham, Ian Hart, Michael Phipps

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    LE9 4LU

  • Name on report verified

    Manorfield Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    120161

Page 9 of 10
Page 9 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+29Mostly positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressmake good progresseffectiveoutstandingimprovingconfidenthighly effectiveexceptionally
Criticismnot alwaysrequires improvementinadequateweaknessesnot yetnot effectivelylimitedserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings425w+70
  • What needs to improve2051w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,388
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 13%What needs to improve 62%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Manorfield Church of England Primary School Station Road, Stoney Stanton, Leicester, LE9 4LU

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 In 2011 and 2012 pupils made less progress in Key Stage 2 in English and in mathematics than would be expected.  Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, and those eligible for the pupil premium have been making slower progress than other pupils in school.  Although improving strongly, the quality of teaching has not been good enough for a sustained period to lead to good progress for pupils.  In some lessons work is not closely matched to the abilities of all pupils.  Teachers do not always check pupils’ understanding in lessons regularly enough, and they do not always use time effectively.  Teachers’ marking does not always clearly show pupils how to improve their work.  The roles of senior leaders are in a period of change prior to key appointments being made. This has limited their ability to support the headteacher.  Teachers with responsibility for subject areas do not effectively check pupils’ progress in

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 Children are well taught in the Early Years Foundation Stage where they make good progress.  Pupils’ standards at the end of Key Stage 1 are above average, because they have made good progress there.  The headteacher has a clear idea of how to improve the school, and has not been afraid to make difficult decisions. As a result, this is an improving school.  Effective management of teachers’ performance has led to recent improvements in the quality of teaching. Much teaching seen by inspectors was good.  Pupils made better progress in Key Stage 2 in English and in mathematics in 2012 than they did in 2011.  Pupils’ behaviour around the school and in lessons is good. Pupils enjoy coming to school, feel safe and work hard. Inspection report: Manorfield Church of England Primary School Stoney Stanton, 12–13 March 2013 2 of 10

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 18 part-lessons, including two that were joint observations carried out with the headteacher. They also carried out a number of shorter visits to observe pupils at work and at play. They attended two assemblies, listened to children read and looked at pupils’ work.  Meetings were held with staff, including with school leaders and other teachers with positions of responsibility. Inspectors also met two groups of pupils, a group of governors and a representative from the local authority.  Inspectors met some parents and carers informally at the start of the school day, and took account of the 74 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View), as well as the results of a larger survey of parents and carers that was carried out by the school. Inspectors also considered the 18 staff questionnaires they received.  Inspectors looked at documents including the school’s plans for improvement, records of the

p.2

Information about this inspection

quality of teaching, school information on pupils’ progress and nationally published results. They also looked at school records of pupils’ behaviour and attendance, and at how well the school keeps its pupils safe.  During both days of the inspection almost all Year 6 pupils and a number of school staff were out of school on a residential visit.

p.2

Inspection team

Michael Phipps, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Elizabeth Needham Additional Inspector Ian Hart Additional Inspector Inspection report: Manorfield Church of England Primary School Stoney Stanton, 12–13 March 2013 3 of 10

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is larger than the average sized primary school.  The very large majority of pupils are from White British backgrounds.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium, which provides the school with additional funding for children in local authority care, for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, and for pupils from service families, is below average. Almost all of the funded pupils in Manorfield are those known to be eligible for free school meals.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is well below average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also well below average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise the quality of teaching so that pupils make consistently good or better progress by:  making better use of time in lessons, so that pupils’ learning takes place without any time being wasted  planning work that closely matches pupils’ abilities  checking pupils’ understanding more regularly in lessons, so they are able to move on to the next stage in their learning more quickly  making sure that teachers’ marking always makes clear to pupils what they have to do to improve their work, and that pupils have the chance to respond to this marking.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the leadership and management of the school by:  reviewing the roles of school leaders so other leaders are better able to support the work of the headteacher  making sure that teachers who have responsibility for subject areas effectively check the progress that pupils make in their areas. Inspection report: Manorfield Church of England Primary School Stoney Stanton, 12–13 March 2013 4 of 10

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Achievement is not good because recent improvements made by school leaders have not had time to make a substantial impact on the rate of pupils’ progress.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 In both 2011 and 2012 pupils made less progress in Key Stage 2 in English and in mathematics than would be expected. This is because in the past the quality of teaching was not high enough. Though standards have been above average, pupils lost some ground compared to the high standards recorded when they entered the key stage.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 The small number of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs made less progress than other pupils in 2012. School leaders have recently improved the quality of teaching and extra support for these pupils. They are now carefully evaluating the effectiveness of this support. As a result, these pupils now make better progress than in the past.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Year 6 pupils eligible for the pupil premium in 2012 were those known to be eligible for free school meals. They made better progress in English than other pupils, though by the end of the year they were still over two terms behind them, a similar gap to that nationally. However, their scores were higher than similar pupils nationally. Eligible pupils in the current Year 6 are making good progress in English.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 In mathematics, however, Year 6 pupils eligible for pupil premium funding made much slower progress than others. By the end of the last school year they were about seven terms behind the rest. School leaders have recently improved the support for these pupils. This is speeding up their progress, and eligible pupils in the current Year 6 are on track to achieve more highly than similar pupils nationally. The gap has reduced. They are around a term and a half behind other Year 6 pupils.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Pupils learn to read successfully. They are taught phonics (the sounds that letters make) effectively, and most can read well by the end of Year 2. Pupils are encouraged to read regularly at home. As a result by Year 6 most pupils are confident readers who can talk with enthusiasm about their favourite books and authors.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Pupils learn to write well and they get the chance to practise their writing in a number of subjects. Writing tasks engage the interest of boys, so they make good progress in their writing.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Children start school with skills and knowledge slightly below those expected for their age. They make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage, so by the time they go into Key Stage 1 their attainment is slightly above average, and they are well prepared for the next stage of their learning.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Pupils’ standards by the end of Key Stage 1 have been above national figures for a number of years, showing progress has been good. More able pupils achieve particularly well in reading and writing.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 School data indicates that pupils’ rates of progress in English and mathematics are improving in Key Stage 2, and are on track to be higher in 2013 than in 2012. Evidence seen by inspectors in lessons and in pupils’ books supported this. Though data shows rates of progress have been significantly worse in Key Stage 2 than in other age groups, learning in lessons is now of a similar quality across the school. Inspection report: Manorfield Church of England Primary School Stoney Stanton, 12–13 March 2013 5 of 10

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Although it is improving strongly, and most of the teaching seen by inspectors was good, the quality of teaching requires improvement because it has not been typically good over a sustained period of time. As a result some of the pupils currently in the school have work to catch up.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teachers sometime do not use time effectively in lessons. In a Reception lesson, for example, children spent a long time sitting on the carpet, listening to the teacher. Not all of them were actively engaged in learning, which limited their progress.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Work is not always closely matched to the range of pupils’ abilities in a class. For example in a Year 1 literacy lesson, most pupils had the same task to do. This did not provide enough challenge for more able pupils, who finished the task early.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teachers sometimes do not check pupils’ understanding often enough. For example, in a lesson in which Year 5 pupils were using atlases to learn about Africa, the teacher’s questions did not check pupils’ learning, so they were not able to move on quickly.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teachers’ marking is regular and detailed, but it does not always make it clear to pupils what they have to do to improve their work. Pupils rarely have the chance to improve their work in response to this marking, or to mark their own work or that of their classmates.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 In the best lessons teachers expect a lot from pupils, and work is closely matched to their abilities. For example in a Year 2 numeracy lesson the teacher had planned a range of practical tasks for pupils of different abilities, which they worked on enthusiastically. The teacher constantly checked pupils’ progress through effective questioning. As a result all pupils made good progress.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils are happy and confident. They work well in lessons, and they enjoy answering questions and offering their opinions.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils’ behaviour around the school is good. They move around the site sensibly. Playtimes and lunchtimes are orderly, and the school is a calm place to learn in.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils’ behaviour is well managed. Pupils understand what is expected of them. They like the rewards they get for working hard and behaving well. The school’s system of consequences is rarely needed.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils get on well together and share well. They told inspectors that they feel safe in school. They are taught to keep themselves safe, and understand the dangers of the internet. Lessons are rarely interrupted by poor behaviour. Exclusions are very rare.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils say that bullying is very rare, and school records confirm this. Pupils understand different types of bullying, and say that their teachers would take effective action if they reported it.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Parents are confident that their children are well looked after in school, and they have very few Inspection report: Manorfield Church of England Primary School Stoney Stanton, 12–13 March 2013 6 of 10

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils’ attendance is above national figures, and is continuing to rise.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils’ behaviour and safety is not outstanding because pupils occasionally lose concentration in lessons and their attention wanders when they are not fully engaged by good teaching.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Leadership and management require improvement because, although the school is improving as a result of the headteacher’s strong leadership, pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching are not yet good.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Senior leadership roles are in a period of change prior to appointments to key roles being made. This has meant that senior leaders have not been fully effective in supporting the headteacher’s actions to improve the school.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Several teachers with responsibility for subject areas are new to their roles. Subject leaders do not yet regularly check the progress that pupils make in their areas.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 School leaders have not been afraid to make difficult decisions about the staffing of the school. Systems for managing staff performance have been used rigorously by the headteacher to raise the quality of teaching. These are closely linked to teachers’ salary progression.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 School leaders know the school’s strengths and weaknesses well. This accurate self-evaluation is linked to the school’s plans for improvement, which concentrate on the right areas.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The headteacher regularly check pupils’ progress. Teachers are held accountable for the performance of pupils in meetings which are held each half term. If pupils fall behind, extra help is given.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Leaders are now looking in more detail at the progress of pupils eligible for the pupil premium. Steps are being taken to make sure these pupils make as much progress as all others in school. The school spends pupil premium funding on support for literacy and numeracy, and has consulted parents and carers of these children on how else this money could be spent.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 School leaders are committed to equality of opportunity. They make sure that discrimination is not tolerated.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The school provides pupils with a good range of subjects, events and experiences. Teachers work together to plan topics which develop pupils’ creativity and which will interest boys and girls equally. Pupils can use their literacy and numeracy skills well in a range of subjects. There is a small number of clubs and activities at lunchtime and after school.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Lessons include topics from a number of different cultures. There are good links with the local church and the school welcomes visitors from a range of faiths. Pupils can reflect on their experiences in assemblies and in lessons. They have a good understanding of right and wrong.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The school has benefitted from good support from the local authority. This support has included Inspection report: Manorfield Church of England Primary School Stoney Stanton, 12–13 March 2013 7 of 10

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

developing the school’s use of data on pupils’ performance, validating school leaders’ lesson observations and providing training for governors.

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The school’s arrangements to keep its pupils safe meet all requirements.

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

 The governance of the school:  Governors are ambitious to improve the school. They have a good understanding of what is happening in school and of the quality of teaching. They understand how teachers’ performance is managed and how this is linked to their salary progression. They oversee the budget well, and know how extra funds from the pupil premium are spent, and the impact this is having on pupils’ achievement. They now evaluate the work of the school well, and help to decide the school’s priorities for improvement. Governors have an improving capacity to hold leaders to account. They are increasingly well informed about the performance of the school compared to other schools nationally, and they clearly understand that the school needs to increase the rate of pupils’ progress, particularly in Key Stage 2, by improving the quality of teaching. They are keen to improve their skills, and several governors have undertaken further

p.7

The leadership and management requires improvement

training. Inspection report: Manorfield Church of England Primary School Stoney Stanton, 12–13 March 2013 8 of 10

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. Inspection report: Manorfield Church of England Primary School Stoney Stanton, 12–13 March 2013 9 of 10

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 120161 Local authority Leicestershire Inspection number 405913

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 351 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jenny Rouse Headteacher Joanne Grace Date of previous school inspection 30 March 2011 Telephone number 01455 272787 Fax number 01455 271523 Email address office@manorfield.leics.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion