Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St George's Catholic Primary School, Warminster

Inspected 6 Mar 2013 · published 9 Apr 2013 · URN 126481

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Sandra Woodman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    6 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Sandra Woodman

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    BA12 9EZ

  • Name on report verified

    St George’s Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    126481

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrongoutstandingconsistentlyeffectivelyhighly effectiveexceptionallysuccessful
Criticismweakerrequires improvementnot yetinadequatebelowgapsseriousweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings383w+35
  • What needs to improve1645w+10

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,953
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 14%What needs to improve 60%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

St George’s Catholic Primary School Woodcock Road, Warminster, Wiltshire, BA12 9EZ.

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Achievement is not yet good because the recent improvements in the teaching have not had sufficient time to accelerate progress so that it is consistently good across the school.  Until recently leaders did not track the progress pupils make closely enough to identify and tackle any underachievement.  Occasionally, teachers do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve in lessons and do not plan to extend pupils’ thinking throughout lessons.  Teachers do not always make clear to pupils the exact steps that they need to take to be successful in lessons; as a result this slows their progress.  Improvement plans do not have precise enough targets and timescales for raising attainment and accelerating progress.  Middle leaders have not evaluated their work extensively enough to know how effective they have been in improving pupils’ achievement.  Governors have not challenged the school’s leaders strongly enough about why some

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 The new headteacher has galvanised the staff team to make the necessary improvements and has taken effective steps to tackle weaker teaching.  The Early Years Foundation Stage provides children with a good start to their education.  Behaviour is good in lessons and around the school. Typically, pupils are polite, considerate and display good levels of maturity.  The curriculum provides pupils with interesting activities that invigorate lessons, and strong links help them to apply their skills in literacy and numeracy to other subjects.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspector observed eight lessons of which three were joint observations with the headteacher. In addition, the inspector made some short visits to lessons.  Meetings were held with pupils, the governors, the headteacher, and the school’s senior staff. The lead inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority.  The inspector took account of the 24 responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) as well as consulting informally with parents and carers before school.  She observed the school’s work, and looked at a range of documents including the school’s improvement plans, information on pupils’ current progress, planning, minutes of the governing body meetings and records relating to special educational needs, behaviour, attendance and safeguarding.  The inspector heard pupils read, talked to them in lessons and evaluated samples of their work.

p.2

Inspection team

Sandra Woodman, Lead inspector Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This school is smaller than the average primary school.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium, which provides additional funding from the government for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and those from service families, is just below average.  The proportion of pupils with special educational needs supported at school action is above average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average.  The very large majority of pupils are White British.  The school has larger proportion of pupils moving into and out of the school than is usually found.  The school is emerging from a period of turbulence in its leadership and staffing. The current headteacher took up her substantive post in January 2012.  The school meets the government’s current floor standard which sets the minimum expectations

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen teaching so that all pupils make good progress by: – making sure teachers always have high expectations and maintain a brisk pace in lessons – planning lessons more thoroughly so that learning is effective in all parts of the lesson – ensuring that teachers provide pupils with the steps to be successful in lessons.  Improve the school leaders’ effectiveness by: – sharpening improvement plans so that they have specific targets for achievement and tighter timescales for completion in order than they can monitored more closely – providing training and professional development for middle leaders in checking and evaluating their areas of responsibility – extending the governing body’s understanding of national assessment data so that the governors can challenge the school more robustly.  An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Achievement requires improvement because progress is not consistently good and attainment has remained broadly average. Taking account of mobility levels in some cohorts, progress across year groups has not been strong enough, especially where there has been weaker teaching. Progress is strongest in Years 2, 3 and 6, with the weakest in Year 5.  In 2012 the attainment of Year 6 pupils rose just above the national average in English, but remained below in mathematics. Progress for these pupils was as expected in English, but below in mathematics, and not enough pupils made good progress from their starting points. However, improvements to the quality of teaching are starting to show impact, particularly on progress in mathematics.  Achievement in the Early Years Foundation Stage is good. Children enter the school with the expected skills for their age and make good gains in all aspects of their learning due to the

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

clearly focused provision. Early writing skills are well developed and children demonstrate their ability at every opportunity.  Closer tracking of progress is ensuring that any underachievement is identified and addressed promptly. Increasingly, teachers are more responsive to the needs of their pupils, providing support to close any gaps in their learning. Pupils with special educational needs are receiving better help so that their progress is in line with their classmates and sometimes above.  Average point scores show that pupils supported by the pupil premium, including those eligible for free school meals and those from service families, attain below their peers in English and in mathematics. The school is taking steps to ensure that all pupils are given an equal opportunity to succeed. Consequently, the funding has been allocated to support programmes which are showing good impact, especially in mathematics.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 The school was below the national average in the national Year 1 screening check for phonics (letters and the sounds that they make), but has taken decisive steps to address this. The more systematic teaching of phonics is ensuring that pupils are making faster gains in their skills. Younger pupils read extensively, and with obvious enjoyment, while the older ones are enthused by the range of new authors that have been introduced.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Over time, teaching requires improvement as pupils’ progress is not consistent. There is evidence that teaching is getting better and this was confirmed by observations during the inspection. Whilst weaker teaching has been addressed, some inconsistencies remain. Sometimes teachers do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve so that pupils’ thinking is not extended throughout the lesson and teachers do not provide clear steps for success, which slows progress.  Where teaching is consistently good, such as in Year 6, the pace of learning is brisk because pupils are clear about what they need to accomplish, their thinking is developed well and not a moment is lost.  Regular assessment and better use of progress information are helping teachers to provide improved support for pupils, especially in mathematics. Marking provides pupils with helpful comments about how to improve their work and this is most effective when teachers allow

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

sufficient time for pupils to respond.  New initiatives, such as Big Maths Beat That to strengthen numeracy skills, are motivating pupils to reach higher levels of attainment. In one strong mathematics lesson, pupils in Years 5 and 6 engaged in impressive dialogue when teaching each other methods for converting fractions. As a result of clear guidance from the teacher, they were able to describe their methods succinctly, deepening their own understanding in the process.  The pupil premium has been used to provide small-group teaching and some specific individual support to help close gaps in pupils’ achievement and raise their self-esteem. Some effective provision in mathematics is showing a marked impact in their progress and confidence as mathematicians. Good links with home have enabled parents and carers to be more involved in their children’s learning.  Teaching assistants give effective support to those pupils with special educational needs, and

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

those new to the school and this country requiring specific support, so that their progress is improving in line with their classmates and is sometimes better.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Typically, pupils are courteous, friendly and display impressive levels of maturity in and around the school. They say that the way the school encourages them to achieve and celebrates success is helping to motivate them to try even harder. Behaviour is not yet outstanding as occasionally pupils’ thinking is not fully extended in lessons and the pupils lose concentration.  Pupils, their parents, carers and the staff are positive about standards of behaviour. Pupils report that bullying is rare but where any concerns arise, adults sort it out effectively. They have a good understanding of the various forms that bullying can take, such as cyber bullying and homophobic bullying, and are adamant that no discrimination is tolerated at their school.  Pupils say that the feel very safe in school because the adults take steps to ensure they are well looked after. They are encouraged to help maintain a secure environment as members of the

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

‘safety patrol’.  Behaviour is managed consistently well by teachers, with a good balance of rewards and sanctions appropriate to pupils’ ages. Warm relationships help to make the school a harmonious place where all pupils feel valued.  Pupils attend regularly and are generally punctual. They are given a wide range of roles and responsibilities in school, such as managing a budget for playground equipment and leading the acts of worship. These opportunities have enabled them to develop their personal skills, such as leadership, effectively so that they make a good contribution to the school community.

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

 Although the leadership of the headteacher is strong, middle leaders are not yet sufficiently skilled or rigorous enough in their monitoring to judge how well improvements are working. Steps taken to address weaker teaching have been effective but improvements are only just starting to accelerate progress.  School leaders are not accurate enough in their assessment of the impact of new initiatives because improvement plans lack specific targets for pupils’ achievement and do not have precise timescales.  The new headteacher has brought stability to the school and quickly gained the confidence of the whole community. She has galvanised the staff and renewed their sense of purpose so that there is high morale and a good team spirit.  The local authority has provided some effective support for the school’s leaders in improving the system for tracking progress, supporting the subject leader to make improvements in

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

mathematics and strengthening safeguarding arrangements.  In the past there have not been clear enough links between the way teachers were rewarded and the progress pupils make. The headteacher is strengthening the way the performance of teachers is managed, linked to the new national Teachers’ Standards so that any underperformance is addressed more quickly. Pay progression is related to the achievement of pupils and the wider impact more experienced teachers have across the school.  The rich curriculum ensures that pupils find activities interesting and enjoyable, especially the new initiatives in mathematics and the opportunities to write more extensively across other subjects. The way the school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is strong, encouraging pupils to be reflective and responsible members of the school community.  All statutory requirements for safeguarding pupils are met because the school ensures that the

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

arrangements for child protection are thorough and that staff receive regular training.  The governance of the school:  Due to the period of disrupted leadership, governors have not had sufficient quality of information enabling them to provide challenge about why pupils’ progress is not yet good. They have not gained an accurate view of the school’s performance, particularly in relation to other schools nationally. However this is improving under the new headteacher and they have better insight into pupils’ achievement with more regular updates on progress. Increasingly they are involved in monitoring activities and it would aid their checks if improvement plans included more precise targets and timescales. Governors have a clear understanding of the new arrangements for managing the performance of teachers and the link to pay progression. Financial management is secure and governors know how the pupil premium has been

p.6

The leadership and management require improvement

allocated and is being used effectively to support pupils, both academically and in their personal development.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 126481 Local authority Wiltshire Inspection number 402401

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4  11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 135 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Paul Bennett Headteacher Louise Croker Date of previous school inspection 24  25 November 2009 Telephone number 01985 218284 Fax number 01985 212797 Email address head@st-georgesrc.wilts.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion