Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Apr 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joan Bonenfant

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joan Bonenfant

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly skilledconsistentlystrongstronglyclearenthusiasticimprovedloves
Criticisminadequatenot good enoughnot metbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,081
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 857 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jkinsman@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Martin Davies Headteacher Blackmoor Park Junior School Leyfield Road Liverpool Merseyside L12 9HB

p.1

Education act 2005 to Blackmoor Park Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 13 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Blackmoor Park Junior School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with yourself, other senior leaders, the governing body, a representative of the local authority and pupils. The school’s action plan was evaluated. I scrutinised a range of documentation, including the local authority’s report on the school’s actions to address the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. I also looked at a sample of pupils’ work and considered letters received from parents and carers about improvements they had noticed since the inspection.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection a new subject leader for mathematics has been appointed and an additional teacher has been employed to work closely with more able pupils in Year 6.

p.1

Main findings

The governing body and senior leaders feel very strongly that the previous inspection came as a ‘wake up call’. Governors have challenged the school to tackle the complacency that had existed in some quarters. They have sent out a very clear message to teaching staff that they will not be content until Blackmoor Park becomes, at the very least, a good school. School leaders have swiftly put in place a thorough and sharply focused action plan to turn the school around. This plan, while still requiring some refinement, is clear, straightforward and well-targeted at the correct issues.

p.1

Main findings

Year group leaders have welcomed their new role in holding classroom teachers to account for pupils’ progress. The recently appointed subject leader for mathematics is enthusiastic and determined to drive improvements in how the subject is taught. This strengthening of the role of middle leaders, in combination with much more challenging targets for improvement is starting to have an impact on increasing the rate at which pupils make progress.

p.2

Main findings

Teaching has improved since the previous inspection, and this has been noted in reports written by the local authority following joint lesson observations with members of the senior leadership team. Inadequate teaching has been eliminated through coaching, staff training and sending teachers to observe good practice in this school and in others. There is a higher proportion of good and better lessons. Pupils have noticed that ‘lessons are harder’ but that ‘teachers explain more’. As one pupil put it: ‘instead of teachers talking and telling us what to do, now they give us questions which we need to figure out for ourselves – when you’re involved it’s more fun and you learn more’.

p.2

Main findings

The marking policy is now consistently applied and again this is appreciated by pupils and parents alike. One pupil commented: ‘We have better feedback – we can check if we have met our targets, and now we know that teachers have read our work’. A parent also was impressed with improvements and wrote: ‘My son loves the two way marking conversation in his books with his teacher. This is a great idea – wish I’d had it when I was at school!’

p.2

Main findings

Governors are well aware that previously the rate at which pupils made progress was not good enough. They are determined to make sure that the school ‘raises its game’. In response to the previous inspection, the governing body quickly formed a ‘Governors’ Action Committee’ that holds the school firmly to account. This has introduced a strong vein of urgency in tackling the areas for improvement. Governors now check pupils’ books and Year group leaders have to report at regular intervals to the governing body on pupils’ progress. The governing body has used its power to refuse pay increases to staff who have not met their targets.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:  increase the intensity and regularity of checking up on pupils’ progress so that action can be taken even more rapidly to stop pupils underachieving  strengthen further the role of the mathematics subject leader so that she can better support classroom teachers in helping pupils to make better progress  increase school targets further so that they are in line with or higher than the national average for expected levels of progress  continue to improve the quality of teaching by checking to make sure that staff training is applied consistently and routinely in the classroom, so that delivering good lessons becomes the norm for all teachers  maintain a watchful eye on the progress of pupils eligible for the pupil premium to

p.2

Main findings

make sure that the gap between the achievement of these pupils and that of other pupils in the school grows narrower Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school draws well on local authority support. An intensive programme has been immediately implemented and this is already having a positive effect, for example in improving the quality of teaching. Termly ‘Challenge Board’ meetings hold the school to account and the school has the benefit of a highly skilled local authority representative. He knows the school well and can therefore provide support that is finely tailored to the specific needs of Blackmoor Park.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Liverpool and as below.

p.3

Her Majesty's Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty's Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board  Local authority  the academy chain where relevant  Diocese - for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools  The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form  The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation  The lead inspector.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion