Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by BREAK in Norfolk

Inspected 18 Feb 2013 · published 28 Mar 2013 · URN SC040191

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Louisa Bayley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 Feb 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Louisa Bayley

  • URN verified

    SC040191

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−5Mixedmore positive than 30% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresspositiveeffectivelywarmrobustsuccessfulpositivelyeffective
Criticisminadequatefailednot metpoordeclinedinconsistentconcernabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings856w0
  • What needs to improve62w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
917
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 50
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC040191 Inspection date 18/02/2013 Inspector Louisa Bayley Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 14/06/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This children's home is owned by a registered charity. The home provides long-term accommodation for four young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

The home was judged as adequate overall at the inspection in June 2012. The home demonstrates its capacity to improve because it has met all of the four requirements and three of the four recommendations made at the full inspection.

p.3

Progress

The manager has updated the Statement of Purpose; it now accurately reflects the practice in the home through correct and current information. The manager now ensures that records kept in the home are signed and dated. This helps to provide a clear understanding of the chronology of events and recording and identifies those responsible for completing entries; which is helpful to young people and staff reviewing the records and documentation.

p.3

Progress

Staff in the home have now received the training in first aid and physical intervention they need to support them to work effectively with young people. There is a programme of training in place and staff review this regularly, to ensure the team are up to date with current practice and developments. There is a new complaints procedure. This ensures that confidentiality is maintained and actions taken in response to a complaint are clearly documented. There has been one minor complaint, from a young person, since the previous inspection. The manager has responded to the issue and made changes to practice in the home as a result. This makes young people feel valued and listened to.

p.3

Progress

The home has benefited from a programme of redecoration and maintenance in response to a previous recommendation. New carpets and fresh colour schemes give a welcoming and warm feel, more akin to a family home. Additional work is planned and the improvements are on-going, giving young people a sense of value and pride in their home. The six monthly monitoring of the home is comprehensive and informative, now with identification of patterns and trends in behaviour. This means that managers and staff are now able to gain a better understanding of triggers for behaviour, which helps to reduce future incidents.

p.4

Progress

The manager has worked closely with social workers to plan transitions for young people leaving care. Staff make a positive contribution to pathway planning for young people and engage with transitions workers, to support young people to move on. In cases where the placing authority have not provided the home with the completed pathway plan, the manager is tenacious in following this up with the relevant professionals. Robust care plans take account of young people’s needs; identifying the support they need to make successful transitions and disengage positively from the home.

p.4

Progress

The number of incidents of missing from care and unauthorised absence has decreased over time. The manager has now put an agreement in place between a young person and their social worker regarding visits to the young person following such incidents. However, there have been two incidents of unauthorised absence for young people when staff have not engaged a visit with the responsible authority. This means that there is still an inconsistent approach to assuring the well-being of young people following such incidents.

p.4

Progress

The manager has made a number of improvements in the home, providing effective leadership and contributing to positive outcomes for young people. The manager is proactive in following up issues of missing documentation and poor responses to communication with the placing authority. She advocates on behalf of young people who have not accessed visits or contact from their social workers; supporting them to exercise their rights to receive appropriate support. Ofsted has been informed of complaints and safeguarding issues. These have been resolved satisfactorily in conjunction with placing authorities and concluded by the local authority designated officer.

p.4

Progress

The home now benefits from having a Registered Manager in post. There has been an improvement in the monitoring of the effectiveness of the home. The independent visitor has started to consult parents as part of the monthly monitoring visits, which contributes to understanding the quality of care provided.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.5

Recommendations

 ensure that where a child goes missing and there is concern for their welfare, or at the request of a child, staff arrange a meeting between the child and the responsible authority to consider the reasons for the child going missing (NMS 5.9)

p.5

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.6

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion