Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Heathlands School
Summary
Mike Kell (lead), Janet Tomkins
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Mar 2013
- Inspectors verified
Janet Tomkins, Mike Kell
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Outstanding
- Postcode verified
AL3 5AY
- Name on report verified
Heathlands School
- URN verified
117685
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.8
- Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make good progress and, in a good proportion of cases, outstanding progress, in acquiring language and communication skills. p.5
- School leaders and the governing body maintain highly effective systems and procedures for safeguarding pupils, and staff follow these guidelines closely. p.7
- They know very well what pupils have learned previously, and they have a clear view about which new activities are going to help pupils to learn even more. p.5
- Extremely good relationships provide a very safe and sound base for learning, and staff exploit this well to accelerate pupils’ progress. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.8
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.8
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,144
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Heathlands School Heathlands Drive, St Albans, AL3 5AY
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
This is a good school
Teaching is typically good, with consistently good and better teaching in the lower and middle schools. The great majority of staff are very skilled communicators. Pupils make good progress. There are no significant differences in the achievement of different groups of pupils, including those with additional learning difficulties. Attendance is high and punctuality is generally good. Pupils behave well and have a positive attitude towards learning. The subjects and courses taught are appropriate for pupils’ ages and interests, and the link with a local college makes a good contribution to pupils’ vocational education. The school is safe. All safeguarding policies and procedures are robust and applied consistently. Pupils make good progress in their personal development, in aspects such as independence and self-confidence. They also show good gains in their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils feel that they are
p.1
This is a good school
prepared well for leaving school. A depleted leadership team has done a good job to maintain an effective school while managing the movement of pupils onto a single site. School self-evaluation is thorough and so senior leaders have a very good understanding of the school’s strengths and of the areas that need further development. Although the governing body has experienced major changes of personnel, the current group ensures that the school is run efficiently, with positive results for pupils.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Not all teaching is consistently good. A few staff do not use sign language fluently, which affects the rate of learning, and not all learning support assistants are wholly effective. The school was not designed for secondary- aged pupils. The accommodation and resources for design and technology (resistant materials) and physical education The procedures for checking, analysing, interpreting and presenting pupils’ assessment information are not robust enough for leaders to make detailed and precise judgements about how well pupils do in comparison with pupils in other schools. are just adequate.
p.1
Information about this inspection
In excess of six hours were spent observing 15 lessons, involving 14 different teachers. Four of the lessons were observed jointly with a member of the senior leadership team. Meetings were held with senior leaders and other staff, the Chair of the Governing Body, two groups of pupils and parents. Not enough parents and carers gave their opinion of the school through the online questionnaire (Parent View) for the results to be displayed. The views of staff were collected from the questionnaires that nine completed. A wide variety of documentation was examined, such as pupil assessment data, attendance records, self-evaluation procedures and development planning. One reading session was observed, although pupils of all ages were frequently seen reading in different subjects. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage were seen practising pre-reading skills in different situations, and pupils of all ages were routinely observed using sign language
p.3
Information about this inspection
as their preferred communication system.
p.3
Inspection team
Mike Kell, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Janet Tomkins Additional Inspector
p.3
Information about this school
Heathlands is a day and residential school, but the residential provision did not feature in this inspection. It was inspected last in April 2012, when it was judged to be outstanding. All of the pupils are deaf and have a statement of special educational needs that includes a requirement for the use of sign language. About a fifth of pupils have additional educational difficulties. The school was on three sites when it was inspected in 2009. One was for primary-aged Heathlands pupils only, while the secondary provision was based within two local schools; a mainstream secondary school and a community special school. The primary site was developed to become the sole site for all pupils with effect from September 2012. It is arranged into three departments: lower, middle and upper schools. There are equal numbers of boys and girls on roll. Around a sixth of them are children in the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Information about this school
The school receives the pupil premium (additional government funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, children who are looked after by the local authority and the children of service families) for around a quarter of pupils, which is around the national average. There have been big changes in the senior leadership team in the past year. The headteacher retired in August 2012 and the deputy headteacher was promoted to the post. Two of the three assistant headteachers who were in post in December 2011 have since left the school, and the third has been promoted to acting deputy headteacher. Two of these three assistant headteacher positions are being covered by lead teachers. The governing body has undergone significant change in the past eight months as governors have left and new ones have joined. The current Chair took over in October 2012. A partnership with Oaklands College enables a group of Year 10 pupils to follow accredited
p.4
Information about this school
vocational courses. The school has received the full British Council International School Award since the last inspection.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Raise the quality of teaching so that it is routinely good or better by: ensuring that all staff have a fluency of sign language that enables them to communicate technical and subject-specific vocabulary and ideas easily improving the effectiveness of a minority of learning support assistants’ contribution to supporting pupils’ progress.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Make leadership and management more effective by: developing the curriculum in the secondary school by improving the provision for those subjects that currently have very limited facilities, particularly design and technology (resistant materials) and physical education introducing procedures for checking more rigorously the accuracy of teachers’ assessments of the levels at which pupils are working, and for interpreting and reporting upon the extent of pupils’ progress compared with that made by pupils of similar age and starting points in other schools.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils learn quickly in lessons and make good progress over their time at the school, particularly in developing numeracy and communication skills.
p.5
The achievement of pupils is good
Historically, there has not been any significant difference in the attainment of pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium and their classmates, and nor has there been any noticeable variation in the progress that they make in English and mathematics. Therefore, pupil premium income is being spent on items with potential benefit for all pupils, such as reading materials and on meeting the costs of additional activities that take place in and out of school in order to ensure that all pupils have the opportunity to participate.
p.5
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils make good progress in becoming competent readers. Good teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 give children pre-reading skills and, further up the school, the newly established reading programme is already beginning to accelerate pupils’ reading capability through intensive daily sessions.
p.5
The achievement of pupils is good
Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make good progress and, in a good proportion of cases, outstanding progress, in acquiring language and communication skills. Children also make good progress in developing self-help skills and improving social interactions as they become increasingly aware of other children and adults.
p.5
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils’ performance in accredited examinations in Key Stage 4 indicates that they make good progress during their time in the secondary school. Following a peak in 2009, few pupils have obtained a grade A* to C in GCSE examinations since. However, year groups are small and the range of attainment is very variable. Around half of Year 11 pupils pass five or more GCSEs at grade G or better each year.
p.5
The achievement of pupils is good
Because year groups are so variable, leaders took the decision to enter high-attaining Year 10 pupils for mathematics and science GCSE examinations for the first time in 2012. This proved to be very successful; over half of those who were entered achieved a grade C or better in one subject and more than a third did so in both.
p.5
The achievement of pupils is good
Key Stage 4 pupils achieve well in other award-bearing courses too. These include Entry Levels, BTEC food technology, accredited courses for speech and language therapy skills, and City and Guilds qualifications in construction and animal care that they study at college.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teaching is consistently good in the lower school, which includes the Early Years Foundation Stage. Extremely good relationships provide a very safe and sound base for learning, and staff exploit this well to accelerate pupils’ progress. They plan carefully and they record pupils’ achievements in detail.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Lower school staff have high expectations of pupils’ ability to participate and engage with others. They know very well what pupils have learned previously, and they have a clear view about which new activities are going to help pupils to learn even more. Teachers constantly check on pupils’ learning so that they can amend tasks in response to pupils’ answers.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teaching in the middle and upper schools is more variable. When teachers have both specialist subject knowledge and the sign language skills to communicate well, pupils learn at a rapid rate. Whole-class teaching sessions have a good tempo and teachers ensure that they are inclusive, with all pupils encouraged to participate. Staff choose follow-up work carefully so that pupils are able to tackle it independently and, on these occasions, pupils rise to the challenge.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Staff plan many activities that require pupils to work collaboratively. For instance, groups were seen sensibly discussing which two famous physicians from history they would save based on their contribution to world health by allowing them to stay in a hot-air balloon while the rest were ejected. Pairs of pupils in food technology had to think creatively, come to an agreement and then cooperate in preparing a dish in response to the challenge of making a unique and original product for a named group by using the ingredients that they had been given.
p.6
The quality of teaching is good
While not inadequate, teaching is not wholly effective in a few instances because staff do not have the communication skills required, such as fluency in the use of sign language to maintain rapid learning throughout a lesson. In a few cases, learning support assistants do not show enough initiative or take enough responsibility for guiding and supporting pupils’ learning.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils go to school as often as they can. Attendance is high and there is virtually no unauthorised absence because pupils enjoy school. Consequently, they invariably have positive attitudes in lessons.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Relationships throughout the school are generally good and pupils usually interact with each other in a pleasant and well-mannered way. Such high-quality interpersonal relationships and concern for others are indicative of the good progress that pupils make in their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
By the time they leave school, Year 11 pupils have grown into mature, impressive young people with a positive view about the future. The school prepares them well for this transition by giving them the communication, social and self-help skills that support their academic achievements and which ease the transfer into college, training or employment.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Staff ensure that pupils are safe in school, and the pupils themselves confirm this. They know about different types of bullying, including cyber-bullying, and they report that, although bullying does occur, it is rare and dealt with very quickly.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Adults generally manage pupils’ behaviour well. The behaviour management system that was introduced in the autumn of 2012 is already making a difference, as staff have the same expectations and they are consistent in the way that they use rewards and sanctions. As a result, minor disruptions cause little loss of learning time.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Effective systems support the small number of pupils who have more challenging behaviour. Plans to help individuals improve their behaviour are applied consistently and, recently, pupils that the school judges are likely to benefit from the approach have been allocated a mentor. For younger pupils, this may be a Key Stage 4 pupil. This role-model approach is beginning to produce positive results. Furthermore, leaders now track behaviour more efficiently and this, too, is contributing to a more orchestrated approach to managing and improving the behaviour of all pupils.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The senior leadership team is much smaller compared with previously, including when the school was inspected last, and all pupils are now on one site. Therefore, fewer leaders are carrying out all of the tasks that were previously undertaken by a full leadership team.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
Leaders dealt very well with the substantial turbulence in 2012 that was created by senior staff and governor resignations and the relocation of all secondary pupils. They successfully retained the confidence of parents and carers, who were uncertain about the relocation on to a single site.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
Inevitably, there has been an impact on leaders’ ability to maintain rigorous monitoring as well as driving forward improvements. Consequently, leadership and management are not outstanding, which they were when the school was inspected last, although leaders provide effective day-to-day management and good leadership.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
Senior staff have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and weakness. Their evaluation of the school is entirely accurate and they know where they need to focus their attention to drive forward improvement.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
Teachers assess pupils’ attainment regularly. The validity of the judgements made about children in the Early Years Foundation Stage are tested at meetings with other schools, and local authority officers monitor testing in Key Stage 1, but there are no regular arrangements with other schools to confirm the accuracy of their judgements. Leaders use the information from teachers’ assessments to measure pupils’ progress, but they do not analyse the data to sufficient depth or make the most of it to compare pupils’ achievement with that made by pupils of the same age and starting levels in other schools.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
The lower and middle schools’ curriculum is well planned to develop pupils’ learning and personal development. Limited provision for subjects such as design and technology (resistant materials) and physical education reduces the quality of the secondary school curriculum, although pupils are still offered an adequate range of experiences either in-house or via the school’s links with a local college.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
School leaders and the governing body maintain highly effective systems and procedures for safeguarding pupils, and staff follow these guidelines closely.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
The local authority does not carry out any routine monitoring of this good school.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
The governance of the school: The new governing body is working effectively to help leaders to establish a single school on a single site. It is fully aware of how pupil premium income has been spent, and it is conscious of the need to examine the impact of this expenditure on raising standards when it examines pupils’ overall progress. However, governors are not presented with enough detail about how pupils’ progress at this school compares with that made by pupils with special educational needs nationally. The governing body is developing understanding of the quality of teaching through its formal oversight of teachers’ appraisal, making sure that better pay and staff promotion are closely related to classroom performance.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.8
School details
Unique reference number 117685 Local authority Hertfordshire Inspection number 408915
p.9
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Type of school Special School category Community special Age range of pupils 2–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 101 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Julia Trueman Headteacher Deborah Jones-Stevens Date of previous school inspection 4–5 November 2009 Telephone number 01727 754060 Fax number 01727 754064 Email address admin@heathlands.herts.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.10
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion