Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

British Printing Industries Federation Ltd

Inspected 15 Feb 2013 · published 28 Mar 2013 · URN 50857

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Derrick Spragg

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Feb 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Derrick Spragg

  • Name on report verified

    .

  • URN verified

    50857

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovedexcellenteffectivevery highoutstandingvery wellhigh quality
Criticismrequires improvementslownot outstandinglowdeclinedinsufficientlimitedyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings273w+36
  • What needs to improve2269w+74

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,456
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 71%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Learning and Skills inspection report Date published: 22 March 2013 Inspection Number: 408526 URN: 50857

p.1

British Printing Industries Federation Ltd .

p.1

Summary of key findings for learners

 Success rates for a significant minority of learners are outstanding and for the majority are at the level expected.  The majority of learners make good progress, achieve their learning goals and many progress to higher skills levels and positions of responsibility.  Many learners develop good skills and produce high quality work.  Teaching, learning and assessment are good overall with some very good group training sessions.  Good learning resources and well qualified and experienced staff support learners to achieve.  The British Printing Industries Federation Limited (BPIF) has a good record of improvement over the past three years.  Leaders and managers have high expectations and work very effectively with employers to raise standards and promote learning across the print industry.

p.1

Summary of key findings for learners

 The proportion of learners who achieve a full apprenticeship framework within planned timescales requires improvement.  Not enough teaching is outstanding.  Not all reviews of progress and actions plans for learners, including plans for training in the workplace and for independent learning, are effective or sufficiently detailed.  The recently improved process for the observation of teaching and learning is yet to have an effect on improvement or on spreading good practice.

p.1

This inspection: Good-2

Previous inspection: Satisfactory-3 Outcomes for learners Good-2 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good-2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Good-2

p.1

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

 Plan and manage programmes to achieve a much higher proportion of completions on time by carefully monitoring progress of all learners; taking prompt action where progress is slow and adopting strategies that result in more clearly specified learning objectives for the work to be achieved by learners between training coordinators’ visits.  Improve the approach to progress reviews and action planning in those parts of the provision where it currently requires improvement by: ensuring appropriate details are covered and recorded and ensuring all learners have a clear view of their progress and individual learning objectives.  Provide more resources, guidance and structure to help learners develop independent learning by: specifying references and sources of further information; providing guidance on the expected content of written work and signposting to backup materials.  Develop more structured on-the-job training by; planning on-the-job training with all employers

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

throughout the various stages of the programme and ensuring there are mentors in all work places.  Increase the amount of outstanding teaching and learning by; sharing good practices; continuing to strengthen observations of learning and ensuring self-assessment is sufficiently focused on the improvement of teaching and learning overall.

p.2

Inspection judgements

 Overall success rates for all apprentices are high. Success rates are very high for those in administration and customer service who make up a significant minority of apprentices. Success rates for those in manufacturing, who comprise the majority of apprentices, are in line with similar groups nationally and have improved. The provider’s own data for the current year indicates this upward trend continues.  Success rates for workplace learners in manufacturing and crafts were very high in 2011/12. Success rates for workplace learners in management were low in that year. The advanced apprenticeship programme in management has recently replaced the workplace learning management programme and it is too early to judge success overall. Most of the current learners are progressing at the rate expected.  There are no significant trends relating to gaps in achievement between different groups of learners over the past few years.

p.2

Inspection judgements

 The only gap of any significance occurred in 2011/12 when the proportion of 19-24 year olds in manufacturing who succeeded in achieving the apprenticeship framework was significantly lower than that of other groups. The provider’s data for the current year indicates this has improved.  The number of learners who complete within planned timescales has declined and is very low in 2011/12 for a variety of reasons including some outside of the provider’s control. Suitable actions to improve are in place based on a thorough management review of the situation although BPIF recognises this will take more than one year to show improvement in the published qualification success rate data. BPIF’s own data for the current year indicates improvement in the number of learners achieving at or before their planned end date.  Manufacturing apprentices in print production develop good practical skills and particularly good

p.2

Inspection judgements

interpersonal and workplace skills. Learners are articulate and capable of discussing their work and their learning in detail with training coordinators and inspectors. Learners' technical skills are very well developed. Many learners take responsibility for operating complex and expensive lithographic and digital printing equipment and achieve high standards of work.  Management apprentices demonstrate a high level of knowledge and understanding of the information learnt in management training workshops and from coaching by their training coordinator. Learners are able to use this knowledge and discuss how to apply for example principles of conflict resolution in the workplace. Employers comment on how much learners have improved in their approach to management and how they embrace ownership of their own professional development.  The majority of learners benefit from additional training and in many cases this leads to

p.3

Inspection judgements

additional qualifications. Some learners achieve advanced skills in using software as a result of additional training courses in Adobe CS4 and Creative Suite. Others received additional training for example to qualify to drive fork lift trucks and another was trained to be the company first aider. These examples illustrate how many of the apprentices establish themselves as valuable and valued employees during the apprenticeship programme.  Progression for learners is good. A large majority of manufacturing apprentices progress into skilled job roles and take on responsibility in the company for higher level print production work, in some cases using state of the art equipment. A high proportion of learners progress from intermediate to advanced apprenticeships in management and take on more responsibility in team leading and management.  BPIF has recently developed a level 5 qualification in management for professionals in print and

p.3

Inspection judgements

media. The programme is due to start spring 2013 and a significant minority of the learners signed up to commence have previously been learners on level 3 programmes.

p.3

Inspection judgements

The quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.3

Inspection judgements

 Teaching, learning and assessment are good. This reflects the high proportion of learners who achieve their qualifications and develop high levels of technical and employability skills.  Group training sessions are very good. Learners benefit from lessons that are exceptionally well planned and delivered. Good learning takes place as a result of a variety of learning activities including excellent use of information and learning technology, good input from training coordinators and good questioning to promote and check learning.  Training Coordinators make good use of learners’ experience and reflection to promote learning in group sessions. These sessions broaden and extend learners’ knowledge and understanding of different print organisations and production environments through discussing experiences with their peers. This is followed up in some cases by visits to other companies. As programmes

p.3

Inspection judgements

have expanded BPIF has not been able to provide suitable group sessions for a small minority of its learners owing to geographical constraints but has well advanced plans to rectify this.  One-to-one coaching is particularly effective in supporting learning across all programmes. During these sessions training coordinators thoroughly assess and evaluate the work that the learners have completed since the last session. They use very good questioning techniques that are effective in engaging learners and checking learning. Learners’ workbooks are well produced and carefully planned to enable progress through the programme.  Training coordinators make excellent use of their considerable industrial experience to demonstrate clear links between theory and practice. They support apprentices through good coaching and technical instruction at work. This enables apprentices to learn skills in print production and to use complex computer controlled production techniques on digital print

p.3

Inspection judgements

machinery. Employers value apprentices’ contribution and confirm the progress and skills levels they attain.  Learners develop English, mathematical and functional skills well. Training coordinators appropriately focus on English, mathematics and personal learning and thinking skills in all training sessions. Many learners have highly developed English skills gained through the technical requirements of their day-to-day work. For example one learner was responsible for designing signs for road-works and construction operations. This involved considerable skill in wording and presentation of key messages that could be read and understood quickly and easily.  Learners demonstrate good problem solving, creative and teamwork skills through managing and participating in projects as part of their work. High-quality portfolios constructed by learners make a significant contribution to learning. Careful planning by training coordinators encourage

p.4

Inspection judgements

learners to provide a variety of evidence. The evidence produced is of a very high standard, reflecting creative skills as well as the printing and layout skills developed by the learners during their courses.  The benefits of having well-qualified training coordinators with expertise and good industrial experience are evident in the all of the materials associated with the programme. High quality accommodation, learning materials and resources contribute to the good development of learners’ technical and workplace skills. Learning materials are well designed and used effectively. Learners receive their practical training in professional print workshops with state-of- the-art equipment.  Assessment is good. It is fair, accurate and reliable. Training coordinators assess work carefully and provide good verbal feedback that helps learners to improve. Learners make good use aide of a variety of evidence and training coordinators use supplementary questioning particularly

p.4

Inspection judgements

well.  Learners’ starting points are assessed effectively and the information used to set suitably challenging tasks and to build an overall individual plan for learning. Insufficient detailed formal planning and guidance takes place for the learning activities during the five weeks between site visits. The impact on most learners is not serious but in a few cases it clearly delays progress. BPIF is aware of this and is currently extending the range and accessibility of the virtual learning environment and other materials to support and guide learners between visits.  The quality of structured learning on-the-job for apprentices is good in some workplaces but not in all. Contributions to assessment by employers are not sufficient in a minority of workplaces. BPIF has plans to develop and strengthen the role of mentors in the workplace and increase the number of employers providing mentors. Currently a minority of them do so.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 The promotion and reinforcement of equality and diversity is good. Learners have a good understanding of the broader issues. Training coordinators are particularly good at integrating equality and diversity into routine technical discussions. For example one used topical examples from football to open up discussions on effective equality and diversity policies in an organisation. BPIF uses very good and original interactive learning packages for the promotion of learners’ knowledge and understanding of equality and diversity and is currently developing more.

p.4

Inspection judgements

The effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.4

Inspection judgements

 BPIF provides good leadership and management and is ambitious to improve its provision further. Performance on apprenticeship programmes has improved over the last three years through a period of difficult economic conditions in the print industry. The company’s position as a national lead and advocate for the print industry is highly valued by employers and strengthened by the recent successful bid for an employer ownership pilot. This collaborative initiative will introduce the first higher level professional qualification for the print industry.  Employers and BPIF share a common vision and objectives to ensure that learners are given every opportunity and are well supported towards lifelong learning within the industry. Apprentices are highly motivated and benefit from good advice and guidance from trained and experienced BPIF staff who have a strong background in print and graphics.  Training coordinators work very well with learners and employers. Their performance is

p.4

Inspection judgements

managed effectively and they have clear targets for learners’ success that are sufficiently challenging and based on continuous improvement. This approach has been successful over the past three years in raising the standards of performance and success rates across the provision.  Staff development arrangements are good. BPIF has good systems for appraising and developing its staff. New staff are mentored and supported effectively. Training and development plans are comprehensive and clearly identify appropriate training to support individual and business needs. The role of training coordinator is well-established and collectively they cover a very wide geographical area thus enabling BPIF to work in partnership with employers at a local level.  BPIF understands fully what skills apprentices require for progression through the industry. Apprenticeship learning programmes are highly appropriate and meet the needs of employers

p.5

Inspection judgements

and apprentices well. BPIF have played a significant role in working with the lead body for the print industry to develop the standards and frameworks for the apprenticeship programme. BPIF has successfully integrated equality and diversity into teaching and learning.  Training coordinators have up-to-date knowledge of the industry and use their experience effectively to develop the programmes and learning resources. They are highly regarded by employers. The learning programmes are well organised and established across the regions. The advanced apprenticeship programme in management has recently been introduced and it is too early to evaluate its impact overall. The programme is well designed and working well at present. Current management apprentices and their employers value the programme highly.  Self-assessment overall is good and the most recent report presents a fair, accurate and suitably

p.5

Inspection judgements

self-critical account of the provision. Managers use data well to evaluate the provision. BPIF has a well-established track record of sustained improvement over the past three years. Very effective systems are in place for verification, standardisation and sharing of assessment practices. Effective surveys are used to gather the views of employers and learners and good use is made of feedback to make changes and improvements.  The introduction recently of an improved and more systematic approach to observing the quality of tutorials, reviews and training sessions has successfully extended the activities covered by observations. It is too early to judge the impact of this yet. Directors and managers are aware of the need to use the outcomes strategically to manage quality improvement and further raise the standards of teaching and learning.  The company promotes equality and diversity well. The chief executive officer has the overall

p.5

Inspection judgements

responsibility for equality and diversity and uses her high profile in the print industry to promote equality and diversity regularly through a variety of media and other influential channels. Employers and staff are kept up-to-date through BPIF’s well-resourced legal section. Apprentices of all abilities and needs receive good support in the workplace.  Participation by females and those from minority groups is low and the provider has actively promoted to these groups through a print website and by schools twinning with local print companies. Progress towards improving participation so far has been slow in some regions.  The company provides a safe environment for apprentices. A senior member of staff has the responsibility for safeguarding. BPIF meets its statutory requirements with regards to safeguarding.

p.5

Record of Main Findings (RMF)

British Printing Industries Federation Ltd.

p.6

on a provider’s performance:

1: Outstanding 2: Good 3: Requires improvement 4: Inadequate Overall 14-16 Learning programmes 16-18 Learning programmes 19+ Learning programmes Apprenticeships Other work- based learning Employability Foundation Learning Community learning

p.6

on a provider’s performance:

The quality of teaching, learning and assessment 2 2 2

p.6

on a provider’s performance:

The effectiveness of leadership and management 2 2 2

p.6

Provider details

British Printing Industries Federation Ltd.

p.7

Provider details

Type of provider Independent learning provider

p.7

full contract year

Principal/CEO Ms Kathy Woodward Date of previous inspection June 2010 Website address www.britishprint.com

p.7

programme level

Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 and above

p.7

(excluding apprenticeships)

Full-time N/A N/A N/A 38 N/A 113 N/A N/A Part-time N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

p.7

Apprenticeship level and age

Intermediate Advanced Higher 16-18 19+ 16-18 19+ 16-18 19+ 23 183 81 188 N/A N/A

p.7

Apprenticeship level and age

Number of learners aged 14-16 N/A Number of community learners N/A Number of employability learners N/A Funding received from Skills Funding Agency (SFA)

p.7

Additional information

The British Printing Industries federation Limited (BPIF) is a not for profit organisation, which provides business support and representation for the United Kingdom print, print packaging and graphic communications industry. It provides support to over 2,000 printing companies located throughout the United Kingdom ranging in size from large multi-nationals to small companies employing less than 10 people. BPIF provides a range of lobbying, human resource and performance improvement services including publically and commercially funded training and assessment. It provides on-site apprenticeship training to all members regardless of the number of trainees or their location. The BPIF’s training, quality and administrative offices are in Meriden and BPIF’s head office in London is also used for group training events. It has seven training co- ordinators based in the regions and works with Proskills, the Sector Skills Council, to develop

p.8

Information about this inspection

Two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) and three additional inspectors, assisted by the quality director as nominee, carried out the inspection with short notice. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. Inspectors also used data on learners’ achievements over the last three years to help them make judgements. Inspectors used group and individual interviews, telephone calls and online questionnaires to gather the views of learners and employers; these views are reflected throughout the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. The inspection took into account all of the provision at the provider. Inspectors looked at the quality of teaching, learning and assessment across all of the provision and graded the sector subject listed in the report above.

p.8

Grade Judgement

Detailed grade characteristics can be viewed in the Handbook for the inspection of further education and skills 2012, Part 2:

p.9

Grade Judgement

http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/handbook-for-inspection-of-further-education-and-skills- september-2012

p.9

Grade Judgement

guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Grade Judgement

Learner View is a new website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too.

p.9

Grade Judgement

To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk or if you have any questions about Learner View please email Ofsted at: achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Grade Judgement

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and provider inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

Grade Judgement

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion