Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Stockport Academy

Inspected 7 Mar 2013 · published 27 Mar 2013 · URN 135262

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Bernard Robinson, Chris Griffin, Helen Gaunt, Janet Palmer

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    SK3 0UP

  • Name on report verified

    Stockport Academy

  • URN verified

    135262

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingimprovingimprovedeffectivehighly effectiveexceptionallyeffectivelyhigh expectations
Criticismnot yetrequires improvementinadequatebelowfailedpoorseriousweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings143w+66
  • What needs to improve1761w+6

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,826
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 64%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Stockport Academy Heathbank Road, Cheadle Heath, Stockport, Cheshire, SK3 0UP

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Measures of students’ progress over time are below national expectations. Although rapidly improving, progress is not yet good.  Students known to be eligible for free school meals, those with disabilities and/or special educational needs, and girls make slower progress than their peers.  Teaching over time has not been good enough to meet the needs of all students and enable them to make good progress.  The sixth form requires improvement. Overall retention is in-line with the national average but too many girls leave their studies at the end of Year 12.  The proportion of students who are persistently absent or are temporarily excluded from school has reduced but is still higher than the national average.  Senior leadership is good but middle leaders are not yet able to fulfil their roles independently and effectively.  Governors have failed to tackle successive years of underachievement.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 Staff value the good work of the recently appointed senior leaders. The Principal and deputy Principal have a clear vision for success and a determination to drive the school forward. This has resulted in improvements in achievement, teaching and behaviour.  A wide range of lunchtime, after-school, and out-of-school activities contributes well to students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.  There is a welcoming atmosphere in the academy. Students are polite and friendly and feel safe.  The students and their parents are very supportive of the academy, particularly the good work of the senior leaders.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 During the inspection, inspectors observed 34 teachers in 34 lessons, including a joint observation with a member of the academy’s senior team. Other aspects of the academy’s work were also seen, including an assembly and tutorial time, and inspectors held meetings with students from all year groups.  Meetings were held with the Principal, the Chair of the Governing Body, a representative of the academy sponsor, and academy staff, including senior and middle leaders. Informal discussions also took place with staff and students.  Inspectors took account of the 12 responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) as well as responses to the academy’s own staff, student, and parent questionnaires.  Inspectors looked at a range of documentation including minutes of the governing body, the academy’s self-evaluation, and data relating to students’ achievement.

p.2

Inspection team

Janet Palmer, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Chris Griffin Additional Inspector Bernard Robinson Additional Inspector Helen Gaunt Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Stockport Academy is a smaller than the average sized secondary school.  The academy opened in 2007. The sixth form opened in 2008.  The proportion of students that staff have identified as disabled or having special educational needs, therefore requiring extra support through ‘school action’ is similar to the national average.  A smaller than average proportion of students have a statement of special educational needs or have extra support because they have been identified as ‘school action plus’.  The proportion of students known to be eligible for the pupil premium is above the national average (the pupil premium is specific, additional funding provided to support the education of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years, children who have been looked after continuously for a period of six months and children whose parents are currently serving in the armed forces).

p.3

Information about this school

 Most students are of White British heritage.  A small number of students attend courses off-site at the Pendlebury and Moat House pupil referral units, and at the Works 4 U training centre.  The Principal and deputy Principal have been in post since September 2012.  The Principal provides support as a School Improvement Partner for St Damien’s RC Science College, Tameside.  The academy meets the government’s current floor standards, which set minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching by: - increasing creativity, innovation and independence in lessons so that students are captivated and challenged by their learning.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Continue to speed up the progress students make by: - ensuring that work is set at the right level for all students including those eligible for the pupil premium, those with special educational needs, and girls.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management by: - ensuring that middle leaders develop the skills they need to fulfil their role effectively and independently - improving the ability of governors to hold the school to account by improving their understanding of:  student performance data  self-evaluation - an external evaluation of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Continue to reduce rates of absence and exclusions so they are at least in-line with national averages.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the staying-on rate of girls in the sixth form by: - ensuring that subject options and pastoral systems support their needs and aspirations.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 When students join the academy in Year 7 their attainment is below that of students in most schools across the country.  By the time students leave in Year 11 they have made progress that is broadly in line with expectations in English, mathematics, science, and languages, but less than expected in humanities and overall.  In 2012, the difference in attainment between students eligible for the pupil premium and other students in the academy was high at 29 percentage points for English and 12 percentage points for mathematics. As a result of the effective allocation of pupil premium funding to reduce class sizes and fund a ‘nurture’ class in Year 7, the gap between their attainment and that of all other students is closing, particularly in English.  In 2012, girls were 6.3% behind boys in their GCSE results. This was recently raised as an area for development by the academy and the attainment gap between girls and boys has decreased.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 For students with disabilities and/or special educational needs, the picture in 2012 was mixed. The progress made overall and in English and mathematics by students supported through ‘school action’ or with a statement of special educational need was broadly in-line with expectations. However, students identified as ‘school action plus’ fell below expectations. Efforts by the academy to tackle this underachievement through improved leadership of special educational needs, has resulted in better progress being made in lessons by all groups requiring extra learning support.  The academy has had a policy of entering students early for some GCSE examinations. This policy is currently being reviewed by the academy because they perceive that it has had a limiting effect on the aspirations of some students to improve their grades, particularly in mathematics.  Students enter the sixth form with attainment that is below other students nationally. Their

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

results at GCE A level and GCE AS level are lower than the national average although the progress they make is broadly in-line with expectations and improving. Progress is better at GCE AS level than at GCE A level.  The small numbers of students who are educated off-site are making suitable levels of progress because the provision matches their current needs and interests.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The quality of teaching is improving. The majority of teaching seen during the inspection was good and some was outstanding. However, a small core of unexceptional teaching is preventing students from making good progress overall.  Leaders have an accurate understanding of the quality of teaching in the academy and know how to bring about further improvements.  Features of the better teaching observed included planning that took good account of what students had already learned and provided for those who require extra support; high expectations of students’ capabilities; exciting and creative activities; and a way of questioning students that enabled the teacher to judge their understanding and challenge them to think more deeply and respond more thoughtfully.  Where teaching was less effective, the pace of the lesson was too slow because the teacher talked too much, resulting in students losing interest. In these lessons, students were given too

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

few opportunities to think for themselves which limited how much progress they could make. In some lessons, the activities were too easy for some students and too difficult for others, resulting in both lower and higher-ability students achieving less well than they might.  In some subjects the marking of students’ books is very good with students engaging in a dialogue with their teacher about their work and what they need to do to improve. However, this is not the case for all subjects or teachers, and some students clearly ignore their teachers’ comments.

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

 Behaviour and safety are not yet good because, although improving, levels of absence and levels of exclusions resulting from poor behaviour are still higher than the national average. However, students were keen to stress how much behaviour and attitudes to learning had improved in recent months. They felt safe and would recommend the academy to others.  The students spoken to said that there is hardly any bullying and when bullying is reported to an adult it is likely to stop. All were aware of their responsibility to report bullying if they witnessed it happening.  Through work in personal, social, health and economic education and in assemblies, students are aware of the negative impact of name calling, including using racist, homophobic and disablist language. For example, students’ work includes a poster reading, ‘sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will break my heart!’ However, students say that homophobic language in

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

particular, is still frequently used, despite their teachers’ disapproval and actions taken to punish the perpetrators.  Students value the new merit system and the rewards for attending extra-curricular activities and for good attendance.

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Passionate ambition and visionary leadership is bringing about rapid and secure improvements in this academy. The Principal shows great determination to challenge all areas of underperformance and is working hard to enable middle leaders, most of whom are new in post, to similarly challenge underperformance in their own areas of responsibility.  Plans to improve what students are able to achieve are clearly focused on the quality of teaching. Teachers appreciate the opportunities they now have for further training including observing good practice in their own and other schools. Access to training has already resulted in improvements to teaching and better outcomes for students.  Senior leaders and governors manage the setting of targets and reward staff suitably through effective procedures for performance management. This is based on teachers’ ability to meet targets, and on how well their students are doing. Regular observations by senior and middle

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

leaders of lessons identify the strengths in teaching and the actions for improvement, which are then followed up and supported.  The Principal values the regular contact and support from the academy sponsor in focusing the academy’s long-term aims and day-to-day challenges.  Procedures are in place to ensure that students in the academy and at off-site provision are properly safeguarded. Keeping safe is also addressed through the curriculum, where students learn how to protect themselves against sexual exploitation and how to stay safe when using social networking sites.  The curriculum is being revised for Years 10 and 11 and in the sixth form to better match the courses to students’ interests and abilities. Students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is enhanced by the very many opportunities the academy provides for them to engage in charitable, artistic, sporting and other activities. During the inspection a group of

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

students were in Poland on a trip which included visiting Auschwitz concentration camp.  The governance of the school:  The governing body has a good understanding of the academy’s finances, including the allocation of pupil premium funding to appoint additional staff and provide support. Governors understand and fulfil their responsibilities with regard to keeping students safe and they have a sound knowledge about how good teaching is in the academy. However, the governing body is not as effective as it should be. Their grasp of the significance of data and how to use it to hold the academy to account is not fully developed. Some important points have gone unnoticed such as girls’ underachievement. Recent minutes of the governing body indicate an increase in challenge to the academy but it is not yet as robust as it might be.

p.5

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 135262 Local authority Stockport Inspection number 406595

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Academy Sponsor Led School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 648 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 69 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair David Robinson Principal Frank McCarron Date of previous school inspection 8 June 2011 Telephone number 0161 286 0330 Fax number 0161 286 0331 Email address linda.duffy@stockport-academy.org guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion