Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Mar 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Smith

  • Postcode verified

    SN3 3LR

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseenjoysuccessfulwell supportedeffectively
Criticismpoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings539w+55
  • What needs to improve15w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
545
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 97%What needs to improve 3%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr B Slater Joint Acting Principal St Joseph's Catholic College Ocotal Way Swindon Wiltshire SN3 3LR

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 6 and 7 March 2013 to look at the academy’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with staff at the academy and at the Oakfield off-site provision. This provision supports groups of students who are not likely to complete their education at school through the collaboration of a group of five local schools and academies. I talked to students and analysed documentation. I also visited New College Swindon and Swindon College, two of the providers that your students attend.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The academy works well with students who arrive from other schools as part of a managed move. These students often are not able to continue with the full range of options they started in their previous school, so they often follow a course of study at college.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The timetable is planned so that students who attend alternative provision in Year 10 do not miss any lessons for their other options or for English or mathematics. Students in Year 11 miss some lessons when they attend their alternative provision but the academy makes sure they have opportunities to catch up on any work they miss. They all complete a GCSE in mathematics and English.  A small group of students attend the alternative provision for the whole week. They study appropriate vocational courses as well as GCSE mathematics and English.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students who attend the Oakfield unit, an off-site unit which is shared with several other schools, do so full time and complete a variety of GCSE courses, including English and mathematics, as well as vocational courses. Many of these students are successful at GCSE art and design, having been excluded from art lessons because of poor behaviour in their previous schools.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students who are educated of all or part of the week off site are well supported. The academy makes sure it gets constant feedback on both attendance and how well students are progressing. The academy visits all providers monthly and checks with individuals how they are getting on.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Providers give good feedback on how well students are progressing and any issues regarding behaviour or attendance. Providers also check on how well students are developing work-related skills.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The academy gives a good range of information to providers, including any particular learning or social needs. Providers are very praiseworthy of the support they receive from the academy and how effectively students are prepared for their placements.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students report that they enjoy their placements, they find the work challenging and enjoy working in a more adult environment where they are able to take more responsibility for their work and behaviour.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 systematically recording the development of students’ key employability and personal skills during their placements.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion