Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Linda Killman
- Postcode verified
SG2 9PP
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance4
“The format is clear and accessible to staff at all levels and to governors.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 601
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Carol Pratt Headteacher Featherstone Wood Primary School Featherstone Road Stevenage SG2 9PP
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 1 March 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in December 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, HMI held meetings with the headteacher and representatives from the governing body and the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s development plan were evaluated. The most recent information on pupils’ progress was examined and the single central register was checked for accuracy. The headteacher conducted HMI on a brief tour of the school.
p.1
Context
Since the recent inspection, one teacher has left the school and one is taking maternity leave. Both have been replaced. The appointment of a permanent teacher for Year 6 has been delayed, and both the headteacher and deputy headteacher are sharing some of the teaching with a supply teacher. Extensive building works are underway and due for completion by the end of March. Some pupils are taught in temporary accommodation while classrooms are being refurbished. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 769 9158 Direct email : rachel.dayan@serco.com
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
School leaders, including the governing body, are focusing determinedly on teaching and learning to raise pupils’ achievement. They are not preoccupied or distracted by potential barriers such as the building work. All agree that consistently good teaching will accelerate pupils’ progress and these high expectations are communicated to staff.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The headteacher has developed a secure strategic plan, aligned to the local authority’s statement of action and backed by the governing body, to achieve this goal. It includes high-quality support and coaching, tailored to need, for teaching that requires improvement. The school invests heavily in retaining good teachers through appraisal and access to high-quality professional development. The headteacher astutely utilises expertise from within and beyond the school. The best teachers mentor and coach others; good practice from the school’s link partner school is shared widely; and local authority advisers provide specialist training, for example, in mathematics and behaviour management. As a consequence, the quality of teaching is improving steadily and most pupils are making sufficient progress. The development plan makes clear what will have been achieved at specific points in the journey towards becoming a good school, and this is reviewed regularly by staff,
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Supported by the link school, the system for gathering accurate information about how well different groups of pupils are learning has been improved. The format is clear and accessible to staff at all levels and to governors. Senior leaders know how well individual pupils are learning and intervene with extra help where needed. Even so, teachers are not being held to account routinely for pupils’ progress through regular meetings and discussions. Targets for pupils’ achievement, endorsed by the local authority, are very challenging. At this point, there is some way to go if they are to be achieved by the end of the school year.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s development plan is fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the governing body, and the Director of Education for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion