Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Patcham High School

Inspected 28 Feb 2013 · published 21 Mar 2013 · URN 114608

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Karen Roche, Mary Hoather, Sean Thornton, Stephen Williams

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    BN1 8PB

  • Name on report verified

    Patcham High School

  • URN verified

    114608

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 13% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingvery wellimprovedeffectivehighly effectivestrongskilledmake good progress
Criticisminadequateweaknessesnot outstandingnot alwaysrequires improvementbelownot yetserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1178w+51
  • Leadership835w+51
  • What needs to improve59w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,995
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 29%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Patcham High School Ladies Mile Road, Brighton, BN1 8PB

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  This is a rapidly improving school which increasingly meets the needs of all its students. It is very well led and managed with strong governance.  There is an impressive range of support, courses and opportunities for students.  Students now achieve well, gaining GCSE results in line with national averages and, in some subjects, notably English, well above them.  The school’s strong focus on literacy is helping prepare students for the next stage of their education.  Teaching is now good, with some outstanding practice. Teachers have good subject knowledge and use an impressive range of strategies to motivate and engage students.  Students’ attitudes to learning are good and they behave well. Exclusions have reduced dramatically and attendance is much improved.  Students are tolerant, work together happily and understand the needs of others.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Teachers’ marking does not always show students how to improve their work.  The professional development of staff does not sufficiently recognise their individual needs, as identified through performance management.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 40 lessons taught by 39 teachers. Five of these were joint observations with members of the school’s senior leadership team.  Meetings were held with students, two representatives of the local authority, three members of the governing body, including the Chair of the Governing Body, and school staff, including senior and middle leaders.  Inspectors took account of the school’s own parent and student surveys, the 113 responses to the online Parent View questionnaire and the 50 responses to the staff questionnaires.  Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a wide range of documentation including students’ work, current student assessment information, the improvement plans and the school’s evaluation of how well it is doing.

p.2

Inspection team

Mary Hoather, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Karen Roche Additional Inspector Stephen Williams Additional Inspector Sean Thornton Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Patcham High is an average-sized secondary school.  The proportion of students eligible for the pupil premium, which provides additional funding for children in the care of the local authority, pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and those from service families, is above average.  The large majority of students are of White British heritage, with a low proportion speaking English as an additional language.  Nearly a quarter of all students have special educational needs or are disabled. The proportion of those who are supported by school action is well above average. The proportion of those at school action plus, or with a statement of special educational needs, is nearly twice the average. Many of these students have emotional and behavioural difficulties.  About 40 Key Stage 4 students attend City College or Plumpton College for one day a week to follow vocational courses.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set minimum expectations for

p.3

Information about this school

students’ attainment and progress.  The school has an arts specialism focusing on English, art and media. It was awarded Artsmark Gold for the third time in 2012 and was among the top 10% of most-improved schools nationally.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that all teachers mark students’ work regularly, using a consistent approach to feedback, so that students understand:  the specific things they need to do to improve  how these things relate to their individual target levels and grades.  Link the professional development of staff more closely to their individual needs, as identified through performance management.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students make good progress from starting points which have traditionally been significantly below average. As a result of the skilled teaching and well-targeted additional support for those that need it, students achieved GCSE results in 2012 in line with national averages.  Students’ levels of attainment on entry are rising. Students now in Year 10 and those below them in Key Stage 3 entered the school with average levels of attainment. The achievement of these students is higher than average.  Standards are consistently above average in English. This has been helped by the good range of literacy initiatives in place. The school has a 15-minute reading period each day for all students known as DEAR (Drop Everything And Read), recognised locally and nationally for its success. This has encouraged students to read more widely, talk about their books and write about them in the school magazine.  As a result of improved teaching and changes to science courses, students’ current achievement

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

in mathematics and science is catching up with their achievement in English. Students also do well in art, French and sociology and in the vocational subjects offered at the two colleges.  The school enters students early for mathematics but has now changed its policy to allow repeated entry because some students, including the most able, do not always meet their challenging targets.  The pupil premium funding is used well to support all eligible students. As a result, the progress for these students has improved, particularly in Key Stage 3. However, their average point scores remain below those of other students in both English and mathematics in Key Stage 4. Although this attainment gap narrowed in English in 2012, so that it was less than in mathematics, the gap has widened again for the current Year 11. At the same time, eligible pupils’ attainment in mathematics has improved, to be in line with English.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Because of good support, catch-up sessions and skilled teaching, in Key Stage 3 especially, disabled students and those who have special educational needs make good progress.  The very large majority of parents who responded to Parent View and the school’s own survey expressed confidence in their children’s progress. These views were substantiated by the inspection findings.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is good with examples of outstanding practice. Inspectors saw teaching that at times was quite inspirational.  Teachers use information about students well to plan lessons. As a result, most lessons meet the needs of all students and contain an enjoyable range of activities and appropriate support materials.  Many subject teachers are encouraging ‘learning talk’ which helps students to speak confidently and more articulately. There is an impressive range of literacy support for targeted students, including reading and spelling workshops and a project with a digital media company which supports the development of students’ communication skills.  Lessons move at a good pace and most teachers are skilful at checking learning throughout the lesson. Students are generally actively engaged with the teaching. They were frequently observed working in groups or pairs, contributing well to class discussions or responding

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

intelligently to the teachers’ well-directed questions.  In the best lessons, teachers are flexible, responding well to students’ questions and acknowledging their views at every stage. Teachers also challenge students to extend their answers and use probing questions to deepen students’ understanding. As a result, students may reach exceptional levels for their age or in relation to their sometimes very challenging needs.  Students understand how well they are doing and know their target levels and grades. During lessons, teachers’ verbal feedback helps them understand what they need to do next to improve. Some teachers, particularly in English and French, also mark work regularly with very clear and detailed advice in relation to target levels and grades. However, this good practice is not consistently applied in all subjects, which is why teaching is not outstanding.

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Students show a positive attitude to learning and behave well in lessons and when taught off- site. They feel confident, safe and respected in school and know how to keep themselves safe in a variety of contexts. They find their teachers and the other adults supportive and approachable, which helps them to learn and progress well.  Students’ movement around the school can sometimes be boisterous, and was particularly difficult at the time of inspection because of building works.  Parents are becoming increasingly confident about behaviour in school with far fewer now expressing concerns than in the 2012 school survey.  Students are aware of the different forms of bullying and say that the school takes the issue of bullying very seriously. As one student said, ‘This is a zero-tolerance school as far as homophobic bullying is concerned.’ The effective way the school has dealt with bullying through

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

a range of strategies, including restorative justice, is reflected in the significant reduction of bullying incidents. Such incidents are now rare.  Good use is made of systems to manage students’ behaviour. Rewards are given for good behaviour, attendance and punctuality. Year 11 students make responsible use of their off-site passes at lunchtime. The impact of these measures, alongside improved teaching, is apparent in the dramatic reduction in fixed-term exclusions.  Attendance has improved from well below average three years ago to average. A dedicated staff team has dramatically improved the attendance of those students who were persistently absent. The school is working on improving students’ punctuality which is not as good as it should be and is one reason why behaviour is not outstanding.  Older students are very clear that behaviour in school is much improved and that this improvement has been accompanied by good individual support. As one Year 11 girl told an

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

inspector, ‘Patcham has done wonders for me.’

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 The school is very well led and managed. It is ambitious for its students. Through the conviction that all can achieve, regardless of ability or circumstance, it is living out daily its own motto of ‘INSPIRE’ and promoting equality of opportunity in all that it does.  Through effective appointments, the careful deployment of advanced skills teachers, leadership development programmes and good continuing development for all staff, the headteacher and governors have built a skilled staff team which is now successfully raising the achievement of all students.  The tracking of the progress of all groups of students is highly effective, enabling all leaders to focus challenge and support for students as needed.  The leadership of teaching is strong. All subject leaders monitor the quality of teaching as part of their regular ‘learning walks’. Teachers work together to improve their practice in an extensive

p.5

The leadership and management are good

range of groups and training opportunities. Students have a respected voice in shaping teaching in the innovative learning partnerships led by the advanced skills teachers and newly qualified staff are well supported. However, the professional development of staff is not yet matched closely enough to their individual needs, as identified through performance management.  Well-developed and robust systems are in place to enable leaders to monitor and evaluate accurately the school’s performance and to manage the performance of teachers and other staff. The roles of senior and middle leaders in these processes are very clear and middle leaders are beginning to hold their teams to account.  The performance management of teachers is robust. Targets are regularly monitored and linked to pay and progression; pay increases are not automatic.  The outstanding range of subjects, courses and wider opportunities meets students’ needs very

p.5

The leadership and management are good

well. Their social, moral, spiritual and cultural development is good and improving, helped by the wealth of opportunities carefully structured across all subjects and through core provision such as life skills, advice and guidance and effective assembly time.  Pupil premium funding has been used well to provide extra teaching time and smaller groups to support eligible students in English and mathematics. Some funding goes towards the literacy initiatives, support sessions after school and residential days away from school. Plans are in place to implement the new Year 7 catch-up premium funding.  The school effectively monitors the safety and attendance of the students who attend college courses.  The local authority provides light touch support for this effective school mainly in personnel matters and through the funding of local partnerships.  The school has worked very well with parents to gain their confidence and support. The school’s

p.6

The leadership and management are good

use of its website for this is innovative. The headteacher’s and governors’ blogs are welcoming, open and honest and the website contains a wealth of information for parents about how they can support their children in their learning.  The governance of the school:  The governance of this school is outstanding.The governing body is well informed and involved in the school, not least through regular governor days. Governors are skilled, have a very good grasp of all the information about students’ achievement and are clear about where teaching is most effective and where it still has weaknesses. They know how the school compares with similar schools nationally and the stage it is at in its improvement. With external support, governors regularly review the performance of the headteacher, and they have a clear view of the pay and performance of all staff. They effectively monitor the use of the pupil premium.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

Governors receive regular training and have worked closely with the headteacher over the past four years to bring about a balanced budget and help work through the extensive staff restructuring this has necessitated. Governors successfully ensure that the systems to keep students safe meet the government’s safeguarding requirements.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 114608 Local authority Brighton and Hove Inspection number 405526

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11 – 16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 994 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Tracy Edwards Headteacher Paula Sargent Date of previous school inspection 15 – 16 September 2010 Telephone number 01273 503908 Fax number 01273 562896 Email address psargent@patchamhigh.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion