Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Patrick's Roman Catholic Primary School, Walton-le-Dale

Inspected 28 Feb 2013 · published 21 Mar 2013 · URN 119640

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Clare Henderson, Louise Murphy

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PR5 4HD

  • Name on report verified

    St Patrick's Roman Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    119640

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 14% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingvery wellexemplaryexcellentgood progressstrongmake good progresshigh quality
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateweaknessestoo fewunsaferequires improvementabsencepoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1369w+63
  • Leadership599w+15
  • What needs to improve122w+80

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,017
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

St Patrick's Roman Catholic Primary School Higher Walton Road, Walton-le-Dale, Preston, Lancashire,PR5 4HD

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Children get off to an outstanding start in their learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage.  Between Years 1 and 6 pupils achieve well. They make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics.  The quality of teaching is good and some practice is outstanding. Lessons are lively and imaginative and provide very well for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.  Pupils’ behaviour is exemplary. All groups of pupils feel very safe and their parents unanimously agree with this.  Senior leaders and governors provide good leadership. Because of this, the good quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement, already in place before the headteacher’s absence, did not falter but improved well.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Teachers do not always set work in lessons that is at the right level of difficulty to help pupils to achieve the best they can.  Pupils do not always have enough chances to apply and develop their literacy and numeracy skills in other subjects of the curriculum.  Leaders of subjects other than English and mathematics have too few chances to check on the quality of teaching and marking in their subjects.  Teachers do not have enough opportunities to share and learn from the outstanding practice which already exists in the school.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed 17 lessons.  Meetings were held with senior leaders, staff, members of the governing body, pupils and a representative of the local authority.  The inspectors checked school documents relating to safeguarding, looked at pupils’ work in their books, heard some pupils read and reviewed the ways in which the school checks on pupils’ learning.  The inspectors took account of the 27 parental responses received at the time of the inspection from the online questionnaire (Parent View), the school’s own parental survey and the staff questionnaires.

p.2

Inspection team

Clare Henderson, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Louise Murphy Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This is an average-sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils eligible for the pupil premium is well below average and in some year groups there are no pupils eligible for the funding. (This is extra government funding to support children of armed forces families, pupils who are looked after by the local authority, and pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals).  The proportion of pupils who are disabled and those with special educational needs supported through school action is below average. The proportion supported through school action plus or a statement of special educational needs is below average.  The school runs a breakfast club and an after-school club.  Almost all the pupils are of White British heritage.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  Since the previous inspection, the school has had a series of staffing absences, including the

p.3

Information about this school

nine months absence of the substantive headteacher.  During her absence, the school was led by the two assistant headteachers and, for one day each week an associate headteacher. From November 2012, the school was led by a second associate headteacher. The substantive headteacher returned to work full-time two days before the inspection.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of outstanding teaching so that achievement is outstanding by ensuring that teachers:  always set work in lessons which is at the right level of difficulty to help pupils to achieve the best they can  provide more opportunities for pupils to apply and develop their literacy and numeracy skills in all the subjects of the curriculum.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise the quality of leadership and management to outstanding by ensuring that:  leaders of subjects other than English and mathematics are provided with more opportunities  to check on the quality of teaching and marking in their subjects  there are more opportunities for teachers to share and learn from the outstanding practice which already exists in the school.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Children start school with skills which are in-line with those typically expected for their age. Because adults plan exciting activities which capture children’s interests very well, they make rapid progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage.  Between Years 1 and 6, pupils achieve well and make at least good progress in their learning.  Well-planned learning helps pupils to make outstanding progress in Years 1 and 2. Their attainment in reading, writing and mathematics in Year 2 has been significantly above average each year, except in 2012 when it was above average.  Results in national tests in Year 6 since the previous inspection have generally been above average and in some years significantly so. Although results in English and mathematics dipped in 2012 from the significantly above average results evident in 2011, they were still above average. Lesson observations, scrutiny of work and the school’s own tracking data show the dip

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

has been reversed for current pupils.  Rates of pupils’ progress are good rather than outstanding in Years 3 to 6. Staffing disruptions, in the past, means that some pupils are still making up for lost learning and, in some lessons, levels of work are not always challenging enough. Furthermore, pupils do not always have enough opportunities to extend their literacy and mathematical skills in meaningful contexts in other subjects of the curriculum.  High quality teaching of letter sounds from Reception onwards enables pupils to read very competently. Consequently, pupils in Year 1 achieved well above the national average in the reading test in 2012 and by Year 2 exceeded the expected levels.  Inspection evidence shows that attainment in English and mathematics for the few pupils currently in school who are eligible for pupil-premium funding varies according to their starting points. However, there is evidence that where there are gaps, they are closing rapidly in English

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

and mathematics and this group makes at least good progress.  Disabled pupils and those pupils with special educational needs make good progress because the staff in school support them really well and specialist external support is provided and carefully tailored to meet their individual needs.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils’ good progress and achievement are attributable to the good and, at times, outstanding teaching they receive. This view is strongly supported by parents and by pupils who say teachers make learning fun.  Relationships are excellent. This creates a strong learning environment. It gives pupils the confidence to contribute ideas and participate effectively in lessons.  Pupils clearly enjoy their lessons and make outstanding progress, particularly when they are given the opportunity to work independently. This was observed in a Year 2 English lesson as pupils confidently and accurately used previously learnt punctuation and spelling skills to make notes about a children’s author and to share their findings with each other and the class.  In lessons observed that were less than outstanding, work was occasionally too hard or too easy for some pupils and so they did not make the progress they could. Furthermore, although pupils

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

develop their literacy and numeracy skills well, they do not always apply these skills across different subjects.  Marking is generally very thorough. At its very best, it is a written dialogue between the pupil and teacher about what the next steps might be to improve. Pupils say that they find both the ongoing support in class and by working with small groups very helpful.  The teaching of the pupils eligible for pupil-premium funding is managed well, with good use of specialist support staff. This ensures these pupils achieve well.  The teaching of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is good because all adults, and particularly the skilled teaching assistants, ensure pupils receive appropriate help specific to their needs. As a result all pupils have equal opportunities and potential discrimination is tackled well.  Teachers make a strong contribution to the outstanding provision for spiritual, moral, social and

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

cultural development. Imaginative teaching and pupils’ full participation in learning are integral to most lessons. For instance, Year 3 pupils developed these skills very well as they discussed and reflected, in groups and as a class, on the reasons for and the effects of, the destruction of the rain forests. Such lessons prepare them well for their future lives.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Pupils’ exemplary behaviour and very positive attitudes to learning are outstanding. The words of one pupil sum this up, ‘I can’t live without our school.’ he exclaimed. Parents fully agree with this view. They are very supportive of the school and raised no concerns about their children’s well-being or safety.  School records show that behaviour is typically excellent in classes, around the school and over time. Pupils’ real enjoyment of school has a positive effect on their good achievement. Pupils respond well to the high expectations of staff. This results in outstanding behaviour in lessons, assemblies and break times. They make an exceptional contribution to their own learning.  Systems for recording and for following up any incidents of misbehaviour are consistent and secure. There are very few incidents of poor behaviour. Instances of racism or bullying of any sort are extremely rare events.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 All groups of pupils feel safe and are acutely aware of what constitutes unsafe situations. They know how to keep themselves and others safe, including while using the internet. Pupils and staff receive training in e-safety.  Pupils are very proud of belonging to the school. They say the ‘3Rs’ of respect, responsibility and resilience are their guide. These are fully understood and lived out. When asked by an inspector for instance, what resilience meant, one pupil explained, ‘It’s keeping going when you want to give up.’  Pupils enthusiastically welcome the numerous responsibilities given to them, such as being school councillors, playground buddies or indeed lunchtime leaders, who are required to undertake a hygiene test before taking up the responsibility.  Members of the school council are highly committed to listening to and responding where they can, to the views of their classmates. They speak enthusiastically about the opportunities they

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

have been given to choose resources such as those in the Reception outdoor area. Such roles enable them to learn to act responsibly and to support each other very well.  Attendance is above average because the importance of going to school to learn is clearly explained to pupils and parents. Absence is followed up very rigorously.  In the Early Years Foundation Stage and the breakfast and after-school clubs adults provide very good care for all the children who quickly learn to share equipment, take turns and to talk about what they are learning.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 Key strengths are the good leadership and teamwork established by the substantive headteacher prior to her illness and continued by the two assistant headteachers, the associate headteacher and governors. This, together with high quality support from the diocese and the local authority enabled the school to continue to improve during the absence of the headteacher.  Senior leaders work closely with other staff and identify actions that will improve the school further. Staff say that the training they receive helps them to improve their own and pupils’ performance. Senior leaders regularly check the quality of teaching and targets set for teachers concentrate on raising pupils’ achievement, and are well linked to training and to their salary progression.  The quality of teaching in English and mathematics is regularly checked by these subject leaders. However, the role of leaders of other subjects is not so well developed. They have, for example,

p.5

The leadership and management are good

too few chances to check on the quality of teaching and marking in their subjects.  The curriculum is broad and varied and promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development very well. Pupils have a clear sense of right and wrong, and show concern for others, for example, through links with a school in Zambia. Music, sports and learning to speak French and Spanish are strengths of the school. The choir, for instance, is busy preparing to join with local groups in the community to sing in a Celtic soul festival.  Arrangements for safeguarding pupils and child-protection procedures fully meet statutory requirements. The strong partnerships which exist with local schools provide good opportunities for pupils and staff to share their expertise and learn from each other.  Parents say they are well informed about the work of the school because of regular newsletters and the highly informative website.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  Governors are well informed and have received training to ensure that they have the necessary skills to carry out their roles, particularly during the headteacher’s absence. They know the key strengths and weaknesses of the school. They are fully aware of how the pupils are achieving compared with other schools nationally. The headteacher is held to account with rigorous performance targets. Governors are fully aware of the performance of staff and their pay levels. In conjunction with the headteacher, they manage the school’s finances efficiently, including the use of the pupil-premium money.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 119640 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 403403

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 5–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 203 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair J Cribben Headteacher K Gleave Date of previous school inspection 11 October 2007 Telephone number 01772 555436 Fax number 01772 257322 Email address head@st-patricks.lancs.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion