Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

St Mary Magdalene PlaygroupOfsted inspection, 25 Feb 2013

Inspected 25 Feb 2013 · published 20 Mar 2013 · URN 135391

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected St Mary Magdalene Playgroup on 25 Feb 2013, led by Samantha Smith. The overall judgement was Inadequate. Ofsted published the report on 20 Mar 2013. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

Inadequate

Samantha Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    25 Feb 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Samantha Smith

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    EN2 7AJ

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary Magdalene Playgroup

  • URN verified

    135391

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−37Criticalmore positive than 53% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRIInadequateNot met

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyhappyeffectivecaringvery wellaccuratetrusting relationshipsstrengths
Criticismpoorweaknessesinadequatelackpoorlyweaknot effectivefailure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings227w−23
  • What needs to improve1469w−39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,644
longer than usual (typical 1054)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

St Mary Magdalene Playgroup Windmill Hill, Enfield, Middlesex, EN2 7AJ

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 25/02/2013 24/10/2008

p.1

early years provision

This inspection: 4 Previous inspection: 3 How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children 4 The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 Planning is not effective and staff lack the skills and knowledge to be able support children's learning effectively.  Systems for observations and assessments, including the two year progress check are not consistent in quality and provide little information about the progress that children are making.  The poor organisation of the setting means that the staff are unable to demonstrate that they are meeting several welfare requirements.  There are no monitoring systems in place to enable the setting to identify or prioritise future improvements. Furthermore there are no systems in place to manage staff performance or support professional development.  The outdoor environment is neither welcoming nor used well enough to challenge or engage children's interest and the outdoor resources are poorly maintained.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children are happy and well settled, they benefit from the close and caring relationships that they have established with staff.  Parents inform that they are satisfied and happy with the care and attention their children receive.

p.1

Information about this inspection

Inspections of registered early years provision are scheduled:  at least once in every inspection cycle. The current cycle ends on 31 July 2016  more frequently where Ofsted identifies a need to do so, for example where provision was previously judged as inadequate  brought forward in the inspection cycle where Ofsted has received information that suggests the provision may not be meeting the legal requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage; or where assessment of the provision identifies a need for early inspection  prioritised for inspection where we have received information that the provision is not meeting the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and which suggests children may not be safe  at the completion of an investigation into failure to comply with the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed activities in the main play area and garden.  The inspector talked with some staff, children and parents.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector looked at documentation and records alongside the registered provider.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector engaged in ongoing discussion with the registered provider throughout the inspection.

p.2

Information about the setting

Mary Magdalene Playgroup first opened in 1982 and re-registered in 1993. It operates from a large hall in the Mary Magdalene Church and serves the local area. The playgroup opens five days a week during school term time. Sessions run from 9am to 3.15pm except on Wednesdays when it opens from 9am to 12pm.There are currently 52 children aged from two and a half to five years on roll. The playgroup receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged three and four years. The playgroup is registered on the Early Years Register. Seven staff work with the children; of these, three hold a relevant early years qualification and two are working towards a qualification. The setting receives support from the Early Years Development and Childcare Partnership (EYDCP).

p.2

must:

 maintain records of information used to assess staff's suitability, such as references and other identity checks  put in place effective systems to ensure that staff members whose suitability has not been checked do not have unsupervised access to children  develop observation and assessment systems in order identify children's levels of achievement, interest and learning styles; use your finding to shape future learning experiences that are tailored to meet children's individual needs and provide an accurate summary to parents for the two year progress development check  review the current risk assessments to include everything that a child may come into contact with, this refers particularly to the garden equipment  implement self-evaluation systems and use this to drive future improvements by identifying the settings strengths and weaknesses accurately and taking appropriate action to address weaknesses identified at previous inspections

p.3

must:

 implement an appraisal system and use it to identify staff training needs and support opportunities for continued professional development for staff, to enable them to gain the knowledge, skills and understanding to support children's learning effectively, for example using effective questioning during activities  make the required records available for inspection

p.3

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

 promote a shared working approach by establishing effective partnerships with other professionals and early years settings that children attend. Use the information shared, to support smooth transitions so that children receive consistent care and support for their learning and development.

p.3

who attend

The playgroup is failing to meet some of the learning and development requirements. This failure is because activities lack purpose and some staff lack the skills and knowledge of how to build on or extend children's experiences. While they spend time with children engaged in their play, the quality of their interactions and questioning does little to challenge children's thinking skills or consolidate what they already know. For example, during a dough modelling activity, staff praise the children for what they are doing and say 'well done' when they make shapes and models. However, they do not encourage children's learning by talking to them about the shapes or encouraging children to talk about and describe what they are making.

p.4

who attend

There is evidence to demonstrate that planning takes place. However, the current systems are weak as activities are not matched to children's needs and therefore have little impact in supporting them in making progress. Systems to observe children are variable in quality. Staff identify children's next steps for learning although these have little purpose and therefore future learning intentions are not focused enough to build on children's progress. The provider demonstrates some awareness of the required progress check for children aged between two and three years and has some evidence to demonstrate how this is being completed. However, the information provided is not consistent with requirements and does not provide parents with an accurate summary of their child's development.

p.4

who attend

Children play in a suitably resourced environment indoors, where they move around and freely access the range of resources available. They have access to and confidently use various electrical toys and equipment, including laptops and other battery operated toys. Most children demonstrate a suitable understanding of how to work such equipment as they independently navigate their way through the various educational programmes. The home corner area provides children with a safe space to play their own made up games with their friends and resources available are in suitable condition. There are sufficient opportunities for children to practise their mathematical skills when they play matching and sorting games, and they are encouraged to count in everyday activities. For example at snack time they take turns to count the number of children and work out how many slices of toast that they need for everyone on their table. Children are beginning to learn

p.4

who attend

letters and sounds through songs and parent's comment that their children continue this at home.

p.4

The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children

Children are happy and content in their environment. The key person system supports them in forming close and trusting relationships with the staff, who show genuine care and concern towards them through their positive interactions. They spend their time at the children's level engaging in their play, praising and encouraging them for their efforts. Suitable adult to child ratios are maintained and on the whole staff are suitably deployed throughout the playgroup, providing children with sufficient levels of support. However, at times throughout the day, children are inappropriately grouped together. For example during circle time all the children sit together to engage in a phonics activity. However, no adaptations are made to accommodate the needs of the less able children or children who speak English as an additional language. This does not support all children in gaining the necessary skills they will need for school.

p.4

The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children

Children behave well and enjoy their time at playgroup; they listen and respond appropriately to staff and the play co-operatively with each other. Overall, they have sufficient opportunities to develop their independence and self-care skills as they learn to manage their own needs. They take charge of their own play as they move around the hall freely choosing activities and they are able to go to the toilet independently. There is also some opportunity at snack time for them to help themselves and serve others. Children are beginning to develop their awareness of safety through the gentle reminders that they receive from staff while they are engaged in their play.

p.5

provision

Overall, the playgroup is poorly organised and managed. The capacity to secure future improvements is weak and there are no systems to monitor the quality of the provision. Consequently, some of the recommendations and actions from the last inspection have not been suitably met. In addition, several requirements are not being met. For instance, the poor record keeping systems has led to some required documents and records not being available for inspection. For example, records to demonstrate that all staff have completed the required suitability checks are unavailable for some staff. In addition, there are no systems in place to ensure that while staff wait for the outcome of their suitability check, they are not left unsupervised with children, which places children at risk. Furthermore, the risk assessments do include outdoor equipment and as a result, many are in poor condition and not suitable for purpose.

p.5

provision

Staff have a limited understanding of their responsibility in delivering the learning and development requirements. They are not sufficiently observing children's progress and using this information to plan activities that are based on children's individual needs. Information about children's achievements is inconsistent and this means they are not able to share information effectively with parents and other professionals involved in children's learning to promote continuity which limits the progress children make. Overall, partnerships with parents are generally sound. Parents say they are satisfied with the setting and compliment the staff on their kind and caring approach. They describe the playgroup as a home away from home and they inform that they are regularly updated regarding their children's care and learning. However, information gathered from parents is not always used effectively to extend and support children's future learning. In addition,

p.5

provision

the weaknesses in the observation and assessment systems mean that staff are unable to provide parents with accurate information about their children's learning and development. This restricts continuity in children's learning between the playgroup and home.

p.5

provision

The playgroup has established some links with the local authority and other professionals involved with children, with whom they attend meetings. However, again they do not use the information shared effectively to support children's overall needs. In addition, they have yet to establish partnerships with other early years providers that children attend. This does not promote a shared approach to supporting children's learning and development.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding Outstanding provision is highly effective in meeting the needs of all children exceptionally well. This ensures that children are very well prepared for the next stage of their learning. Grade 2 Good Good provision is effective in delivering provision that meets the needs of all children well. This ensures children are ready for the next stage of their learning. Grade 3 Satisfactory Satisfactory provision is performing less well than expectations in one or more of the key areas. It requires improvement in order to be good. Grade 4 Inadequate Provision that is inadequate requires significant improvement and/or enforcement. The provision is failing to give children an acceptable standard of early years education and/or is not meeting the safeguarding and welfare requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage. It will be inspected again within 12 months of the date of this inspection.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Met The provision has no children on roll. The inspection judgement is that the provider continues to meet the requirements for registration. Not Met The provision has no children on roll. The inspection judgement is that the provider does not meet the requirements for registration.

p.6

Inspection

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under Sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.6

Setting details

Unique reference number 135391 Local authority Enfield Inspection number 813845 Type of provision Sessional provision Registration category Childcare - Non-Domestic Age range of children 0 - 5 Total number of places 25 Number of children on roll 52 Name of provider Sandra Pearce Date of previous inspection 24/10/2008 Telephone number 020 8363 3953

p.7

Setting details

set out in the guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.

p.7

Type of provision

For the purposes of this inspection the following definitions apply:

p.7

Type of provision

Full-time provision is that which operates for more than three hours. These are usually known as nurseries, nursery schools and pre-schools and must deliver the Early Years Foundation Stage. They are registered on the Early Years Register and pay the higher fee for registration.

p.7

Type of provision

Sessional provision operates for more than two hours but does not exceed three hours in any one day. These are usually known as pre-schools, kindergartens or nursery schools and must deliver the Early Years Foundation Stage. They are registered on the Early Years Register and pay the lower fee for registration.

p.7

Type of provision

Childminders care for one or more children where individual children attend for a period of more than two hours in any one day. They operate from domestic premises that are usually their own home. They are registered on the Early Years Register and must deliver the Early Years Foundation Stage. Out of school provision may be sessional or full-time provision and is delivered before or after school and/or in the summer holidays. They are registered on the Early Years Register and must deliver the Early Years Foundation Stage. Where children receive their Early Years Foundation Stage in school these providers do not have to deliver the learning and development requirements in full but should complement the experiences children receive in school. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family

p.7

Type of provision

Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Type of provision

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

Type of provision

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion