Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Mar 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Smith

  • Postcode verified

    BA21 3JD

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+57Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell-supportedconfidentenjoy
Criticismabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings493w+57
  • What needs to improve28w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
513
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 95%What needs to improve 5%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr A Bloxham Principal Preston School Academy Monks Dale Yeovil Somerset BA21 3JD

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 28 February and 1 March 2013 to look at the school’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with staff at the school and a group of students. I analysed documentation and visited the following providers that your students attend: Transport Systems (Western) LTD, Cyril Gallie – The Hair Shop and REACH (alternative and complimentary educational solutions for individuals).

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The academy meets the needs of the vast majority of its students well within the main school curriculum. For a few students each year the academy arranges suitable off-site activities which mean these students complete their education and are then able to access further education, employment or training.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The academy uses the local authority database to find suitable placements as part of the local 14-19 agreement. All placements on the database have had suitable checks by the local authority.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The timetable is carefully planned so that students who attend alternative provision do this instead of one or two of their options and hence they do not miss any other lessons. All students who attend alternative provision complete a GCSE in mathematics and English as well as other courses and they are therefore not disadvantaged by studying off-site.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 These students are well-supported back in school where they meet with their tutor to discuss how well they are getting on at their placements.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students who attend REACH have a report each week from the provider which is shared with school. This report identifies how well students are developing, including in becoming more responsible and in becoming more confident. Students who attend work placements have verbal feedback and receive a professional reference at the end of their time at the placement.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school gives a good range of information to providers, including any particular learning or social needs. All students have a card to record their attendance at their placements and the academy is notified immediately of any absence. A member of staff telephones each placement frequently to get feedback on how well the students have worked and also visits the placements every half term.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students report that they enjoy their placements, they find the work challenging and it helps them to be more self-sufficient. They also say it helps them relate better to adults and they recognise the importance of speaking to customers in a professional way.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 systematically recording the development of students’ key employability and personal skills during their placements, and reporting these developments to parents as part of the annual student report.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion