Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
David Jones
- Postcode verified
CO15 3SP
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In an outstanding Year 1 literacy lesson, the pupils’ writing improved rapidly because of the very effective blending of speaking and listening tasks, driven forward by incisive teacher questions. p.3
- Similarly, in an outstanding Reception class session the teacher managed an effective mix of activities very well. p.3
- Engagement with parents is strong and the child care provision offered in ‘Little Sparkles’ has a very strong community support focus. p.3
- In those lessons where speaking and listening were prioritised, pupils consistently made good progress. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,089
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Gavin Bradley Headteacher White Hall Academy Melbourne Road Clacton-on-Sea CO15 3SP
p.1
No formal designation monitoring inspection of White Hall Academy
Following my visit with John Mitcheson Her Majesty’s Inspector, to your academy on 27–28 February 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.
p.1
No formal designation monitoring inspection of White Hall Academy
The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out because the academy’s predecessor school was judged to be a school causing concern.
p.1
Evidence
Inspectors observed the academy’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the headteacher, the executive headteacher of the sponsoring academy trust, the Chair of the Governing Body and another governor who were both representatives of the sponsors.
p.1
Evidence
Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the academy is making reasonable progress in raising standards for all pupils.
p.1
Context
The predecessor school closed in August 2012 and White Hall academy opened on 1 September in the same buildings. The number of pupils on roll has risen, reflecting the school’s enhanced reputation in the local community. Three teachers left at the end of the summer term. Five new colleagues, including four newly qualified teachers, were appointed to permanent posts at the start of the school year and one Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T: 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com teacher was promoted to lead literacy in Key Stage 1. HMI observed all staff teach and offered professional feedback.
p.1
Context
The associate headteacher from the predecessor school, along with the head of teaching and learning, had been seconded from Lyons Hall Primary School. They were appointed as headteacher and head of teaching and learning of Whitehall Academy from 1 September 2012. They work in partnership with the Learning Pathways Academies Trust and Lyons Hall Primary School.
p.2
Context
The academy is nearly twice the size of the average primary school. The large majority of pupils are White British. The percentage of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is average, although the proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is low. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is high and rising. As a result, the academy receives additional government funding (the pupil premium) for over half of the pupils in each year group, a figure well above the national average.
p.2
Context
The proportion of pupils who need extra help with their learning because they are disabled or have special educational needs is above average. These include pupils supported at school action, school action plus and those with a statement of special educational needs.
p.2
Context
The academy has early years child care provision for pupils aged 2 to 3 years; ‘Little Sparkles’ is managed by the academy governing body. A large Early Years Foundation Stage provision includes Nursery and Reception classes.
p.2
Achievement of pupils at the academy
Attainment is rising in all year groups although variations remain between reading, writing and mathematics. Pupil progress is improving, continuing a trend established when the current leadership team were seconded to the predecessor school. The large numbers of pupils supported by initiatives funded by the pupil premium often make better progress than the rest of the school.
p.2
Achievement of pupils at the academy
Half of the pupils who join the Reception class have spent time in the vibrant Nursery provision where their progress is well documented. However, significant numbers of pupils join the academy during the latter part of the Reception Year and above average numbers join other year groups during Key Stage 2; the gaps in their prior learning remain evident. The academy is building a detailed evidence base to document the progress of all pupils.
p.2
Achievement of pupils at the academy
The rising proportion of good teaching is improving current pupil progress in reading, writing and mathematics. However, the local authority has expressed its concern regarding the accuracy of the Key Stage 1 National Curriculum scores recorded by the predecessor school prior to the arrival of the current leadership team.
p.2
The quality of teaching
The increasing proportion of pupils making above average progress since the academy opened is a testimony to the improvements secured in teaching and support. Some lessons observed required improvement, often where small organisational issues needed adjustment. In an outstanding Year 1 literacy lesson, the pupils’ writing improved rapidly because of the very effective blending of speaking and listening tasks, driven forward by incisive teacher questions. Similarly, in an outstanding Reception class session the teacher managed an effective mix of activities very well. The children’s focus and discussion was intense and the well- organised ‘snack café’ led by support staff created effective opportunities for individual debate.
p.3
The quality of teaching
Teaching provides clear expectations of the social and moral standards required of the pupils. Marking is completed regularly but not all comments are in easy language for pupils to understand. Some support staff listen carefully to the pupils’ ideas and question effectively to improve learning. In those lessons where speaking and listening were prioritised, pupils consistently made good progress.
p.3
Behaviour and safety of pupils
The pupil’s behaviour was a positive feature of every lesson. Attitudes to learning are often enthusiastic. Attendance has risen significantly in the last year and is close to the national average. Exclusions have declined dramatically and are currently low. Movement around the academy is considerate and pupils are caring of each other.
p.3
The quality of leadership in and management of the academy
The energy and focus of the leadership team has driven the notable improvements in achievement, teaching, behaviour and attendance. The promotion of equality of opportunity is a strength.
p.3
The quality of leadership in and management of the academy
Provision is well planned and resources are used well. Engagement with parents is strong and the child care provision offered in ‘Little Sparkles’ has a very strong community support focus.
p.3
The quality of leadership in and management of the academy
The academy development plan is under constant review by senior staff. They are relentless in making sure that all pupils in the school receive the best education possible. However, they acknowledge that more needs to be done to raise standards and improve pupil progress.
p.3
The quality of leadership in and management of the academy
The governing body brings considerable experience to challenging discussions with all staff and ensure that decisions about teachers’ pay are closely linked to the effectiveness of their teaching, and the roles they fulfil. The governing body ensures that requirements for the safeguarding of pupils are met. However, they had not ensured the academy web site contained the required information regarding pupil premium expenditure.
p.3
External support
The academy has gained substantially from the partnership with the Learning Pathways Academies Trust and Lyons Hall Primary School in helping to raise the pupils’ attainment.
p.4
Priorities for further improvement
Ensure that pupil progress is clearly documented from the time the academy opened.
p.4
Priorities for further improvement
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion