Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Durham County Council in Durham

Inspected 30 Jan 2013 · published 12 Mar 2013 · URN SC035235

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bill Drumm

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    30 Jan 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Bill Drumm

  • URN verified

    SC035235

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressoutstandingindependentsafehappywarmsuccessful
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
729
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 50
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC035235 Inspection date 30/01/2013 Inspector Bill Drumm Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 08/10/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

The children's home provides care and accommodation for up to three young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. The provider is a local authority.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

At the last inspection in October 2012, the overall effectiveness rating of the home was good. The home has made good progress since the last inspection. Developments and improvements ensure that young people remain well-cared for and safe. Young people appear happy living at the home and have a warm, relaxed and friendly manner with staff.

p.3

Progress

Five recommendations were made at the last inspection and all of these matters have been addressed. Two recommendations were made in relation to the home's behaviour management procedures. Specifically, to ensure that the home's restraint records are fully compliant with national minimum standards, and that all sanctions used to help young people modify their behaviour are both reasonable and proportionate. The home's manager has reviewed the home's restraint records and they now fully comply with national minimum standards. All essential information is recorded and young people are kept safe. In addition, the home's manager has, through individual supervision sessions and team meetings, reminded staff of the home's policy and procedures relating to the issuing of sanctions. All sanctions used to help young people modify their behaviour are both reasonable and proportionate. This helps young people to understand the effect their behaviour can have on others.

p.3

Progress

A recommendation was made to ensure that all young people who are old enough have an up-to-date pathway plan to aid their transition into adulthood. Pathway plans for all eligible young people are now in place. This means that the young people will receive the help and support necessary to make a successful transition into adulthood.

p.4

Progress

A further recommendation was made to ensure that the written records used for recording when a young person has been missing from the home include the location where they are returning from. The home's manager has reviewed these records and all essential information is now recorded. This affords greater analysis of these incidents.

p.4

Progress

The final recommendation was in relation to visits to the home by an independent visitor. The independent visitor did not routinely speak with staff about the quality of care in the home and the service delivered to young people. Documentation used by the independent visitor to record their visits has now been reviewed and up dated. The documentation has specific areas which they must complete in order to collate this information. This helps to ensure that all interactions are fully recorded and that the opinions of all those involved are borne in mind, particularly staff members.

p.4

Progress

In addition to the above, the home has made further progress and improvements that enhance the quality of the care provided to young people. The home's manager has introduced a system where individual staff members look at specific procedures and then set informal quizzes for their colleagues to answer within team meetings. This initiative helps staff to understand policies and procedures and what their individual roles and responsibilities are. In addition, the staff team have looked at Ofsted's grade descriptors for achieving good and outstanding judgements. The analysis of Ofsted's grade descriptors alongside their care practice will help the home to maintain their levels of care and work towards achieving higher standards.

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion