Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Mar 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jacqueline Wordsworth

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jacqueline Wordsworth

  • Postcode verified

    WV6 8XG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveoutstandingimprovingclearlysecure
Criticismabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
746
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mostyn Mahoney Headteacher Tettenhall Wood School Regis Road Tettenhall Wood Wolverhampton WV6 8XG

p.1

Education act 2005 to Tettenhall Wood School

Following my visit to your school on 11 February 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Tettenhall Wood School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in Novemeber 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, two members of the senior leadership team, eight members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. A learning walk was completed with the headteacher. The school improvement plan was also evaluated.

p.1

Context

There have been no contextual changes since the school’s previous inspection in November 2012. Three senior members of staff remain on long-term absence.

p.1

Main findings

The headteacher and those with extra responsibilities have begun to make appropriate changes in the school. Together they have: Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T :0121 679 9159 Direct email : lisa.parkes@serco.com  drawn up an improvement plan with a list of actions aligned to the areas for improvement  reviewed the effectiveness of the leadership in the sixth form  employed an external consultant to help identify best practice from other schools  implemented a more effective system to track rewards and sanctions for behaviour  begun training to improve the teaching of English and mathematics across the school  examined ways of improving how teachers assess and record pupils’ progress  reorganised the school day to increase the time pupils spend learning in lessons.

p.1

Main findings

The senior leadership group intend to carry out a weekly review of the action plan with governors receiving monthly updates on the progress leaders are making in meeting their targets for improvement. However, those in charge of the school recognise that:

p.2

Main findings

 an external review of governance has not taken place  governors are not fully involved in gathering first-hand evidence of the impact and effectiveness of the school’s work  lesson observation and detailed scrutiny of pupils’ work have not taken place  teachers are not using pupil attainment information to make sure that all lessons are planned at the right level of difficulty for individual pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 work with the local authority in order to strengthen the skills of those who lead the school during staff absence  increase the frequency of checks on the quality of teachers’ work including lesson observations, scrutiny of planning and pupils’ work  make sure that the improvement plans clearly specify how and when governors will check on the effectiveness of the school’s actions  increase the governors knowledge of how to evaluate progress of low-attaining disabled pupils and those with special educational needs (DSEND)  update the school improvement plan so that it makes explicit the required impact of the changes on pupils’ learning.

p.2

Main findings

 identify outstanding special schools within the West Midlands, and offer to make contact with such schools  provide the school with good practice survey reports on governance and the special educational needs review  spend half a day working with the phase leader for primary.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority will be undertaking a review of teaching and learning later this week. It is planning to help the school recruit additional members of the governing body to strengthen its capacity to hold the school to account and particularly developing their knowledge of how to evaluate progress of low-attaining disabled pupils and those with special educational needs (DSEND). Further support is required to strengthen the school’s senior leadership during the period of prolonged absence of key members of staff. The local authority has also offered to help arrange for an external review of governance, should the school find it difficult to secure the support of a National Leader of Governance.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Wolverhampton.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion