Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Surrey County Council in Surrey
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
25 Jan 2013
- Inspectors verified
Jennie Christopher
- URN verified
SC370703
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Young people continue to receive highly individualised and well-planned care from a committed and enthusiastic staff team. p.4
- This has ensured that young people have continued to benefit from the high quality and effective care they have been used to. p.4
- At the last full inspection in July 2012, the overall quality rating for the service was judged as outstanding with four recommendations made. p.3
- Young people have a positive view of the care that they receive and observed interactions suggest their relationships with staff are good and that they feel safe. p.4
- Staff have clear and consistent boundaries, which enable young people to positively manage their own behaviour and learn new skills. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 830
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC370703 Inspection date 25/01/2013 Inspector Jennie Christopher Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 12/07/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
The service is owned and run by the local authority, providing short breaks for up to 20 young people with learning disabilities.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last full inspection in July 2012, the overall quality rating for the service was judged as outstanding with four recommendations made. The service demonstrates continuity in the quality of care provided and a focused commitment to service development. A particular strength of the home is the sensitive and individualised approach to meeting young people’s needs, while challenging them to learn new skills.
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection recommendations were set regarding gaining young people’s views after sanctions and ensuring they had access to a medical professional after restraints. The records of sanction and restraints now include these areas. However due to the service’s behaviour management approach, there have been no sanctions or restraints for a considerable time. A recommendation set that staff should have two references, even when it is an internal application cannot currently be determined as met. There have been no new appointments of internal staff since the last inspection. However, the acting manager has requested a copy of the personnel file of a bank member of staff who works for the organisation to ensure she has proper oversight of the individual’s personnel checks. The final recommendation asked that the time and length of supervision be recorded. The overview sheet of supervision now contains this. The start and finish time of supervisions is on
p.3
Progress
individuals copies of supervision notes, but is not contained within the overview document.
p.4
Progress
Young people continue to receive highly individualised and well-planned care from a committed and enthusiastic staff team. Young people have a positive view of the care that they receive and observed interactions suggest their relationships with staff are good and that they feel safe. Staff have clear and consistent boundaries, which enable young people to positively manage their own behaviour and learn new skills. The high staffing ratio ensures young people benefit from the support and attention they require to experience new activities while keeping safe. The culture within the service celebrates individuality and diversity. As a result, young people receive quality care and support based on their individually assessed needs.
p.4
Progress
Since the last inspection, the Registered Manager has taken a seconded position. The deputy manager has become the acting manager and has started the Registered Manager application process. The service is currently considering how it will operate in the future and during these uncertain times the acting manager and senior management team have provided support to the at times anxious staff team. This has ensured that young people have continued to benefit from the high quality and effective care they have been used to. The acting manager has several plans in place as to how rooms within the building could be better used to provide further positive experiences for young people using the service, such as improved soft play and sensory areas and making greater use of the music facilities on site. Young people are encouraged to be involved in this process and their views are acted upon when appropriate. The building remains homely and functional, however the kitchens
p.4
Progress
which are well used by all young people, are not in keeping with the high standard of decor and maintenance in the rest of the building. Six monthly monitoring by managers demonstrate consultation with young people, staff and other significant people, but have not been forwarded to Ofsted when completed. The service continues to provide evaluative reports of independent monitoring visits and act promptly on any recommendations made.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure the home is well maintained and decorated, with specific regard to the kitchens (NMS 10.3) provide reports of the manager's monitoring of the home to Ofsted six monthly. (volume 5, statutory guidance, paragraph 3.14)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion