Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Mar 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Linda Killman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Linda Killman

  • Postcode verified

    NR20 4BW

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progresseffectiveindependentclearlyclear
Criticismshortcomingsnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
579
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Jessica Balado Headteacher St Mary's Community Primary School, Beetley Elmham Road Beetley Dereham NR20 4BW

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Mary's Community Primary School, Beetley

Following my visit to your school on 27 February 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Mary's Community Primary School, Beetley

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, middle leaders, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement plan was evaluated. The headteacher conducted HMI on a short tour of the school.

p.1

Context

The senior teacher has been absent from school since January and the Year 5 teacher has moved into Year 6. There have been no other significant changes since the last inspection.

p.1

Main findings

The school has devised effective systems to gather information about pupils’ achievement, including an electronic data system and regular meetings to discuss Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T :0121 679 9168 Direct email : beverley.joyner@serco.com pupils’ learning. The headteacher is supporting staff in using data to measure how much progress different groups of pupils are making. Changes to approaches in the teaching of reading are accelerating pupils’ progress. The special educational needs coordinator is considering better ways to use teaching assistants’ skills to support and promote good learning. The school improvement plan reflects key priorities identified in the recent inspection and is driven by better outcomes for pupils. However, the plan is too vague: expectations for good progress are not set out

p.1

Main findings

clearly with measurable figures, leaving ‘good progress’ open to interpretation.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body is not up to speed in agreeing a clear plan of action to address shortcomings identified at the inspection and those arising from a recent audit. Governors have recently received training in how to interpret data. Regular monitoring of the school’s work especially teaching and pupils’ achievement, independent of that undertaken by staff, is not happening. As a result, little headway has been made on strengthening governance.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection and plans are not sharply focused on rapidly bringing about improvement. The school should take immediate action to:

p.2

Main findings

 sharpen targets for pupils’ good progress ensuring that they are quantified and measurable  ensure that the governing body completes and implements its plans to improve governance  engage governors in regular monitoring of the school’s work independent of that undertaken by staff.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority has supported the school in developing an electronic system to collect information on pupils’ achievement. It has undertaken a full review of the governing body’s effectiveness and provided training on how to interpret and use data. Training and professional development for teaching staff, tailored to need, is helping to improve their performance and raise pupils’ achievement.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion