Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
John Rutherford
- Postcode verified
DE75 7BZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 663
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Alison Seaton Coppice Primary School Roper Avenue Heanor DE75 7BZ
p.1
Education Act 2005 to Coppice Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 08 February 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on my findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education Act 2005 to Coppice Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the acting headteacher, the deputy headteacher, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority. The inspector analysed a range of management documents, including those relating to school self-evaluation, development planning and the improvement of teaching. Brief visits were made to each class.
p.1
Context
The school has recently advertised for a permanent headteacher.
p.1
Main findings
Improvements in teaching and pupils’ achievement started in September 2012 when a temporary acting headteacher was appointed from another school and the senior leadership team became stable for the first time in three years. Senior leaders quickly identified key weaknesses and drew up a sharply focused plan to tackle Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9159 Direct email : lisa.parkes@serco.com them. This plan was agreed with the local authority and it weaved in their support. The high quality of this improvement plan was acknowledged by the inspection team and it is contributing to a rapid pace of improvement. The quality of teaching is improving because senior leaders systematically identify each teacher’s strengths and weaknesses and provide coaching closely matched to their needs. Lesson plans
p.1
Main findings
are scrutinised to ensure they provide the correct level of challenge for all groups of pupils. Each teacher has an extensive set of prompts to help them ask questions that make pupils think hard and answer with full explanations. Very clear guidance is improving the teaching of writing skills and the feedback given to pupils when their work is marked. As a result of improvements to the curriculum, pupils are more motivated to write because their work is linked to interesting topics. This is helping them to improve their skills in writing at length and varying the style for different audiences. Senior leaders have changed the organisation of subject leadership responsibilities so that they are better matched to teachers’ strengths and more experienced leaders can support those new to a post.
p.2
Main findings
During the last three years, the Governing Body has been pre-occupied with issues relating to turbulence in school leadership. Following the inspection, and with the help of local authority training, they have re-focused their work on evaluating pupils’ achievement and ensuring school leaders are doing everything possible to improve it. Records of recent meetings show they are now asking very searching questions about why some groups are under-achieving and whether support programmes are helping them to make up lost ground.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and the Governing Body are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority identified concerns before the inspection and, in partnership with the Governing Body, they strengthened the senior leadership team with the appointment of a temporary acting headteacher who has a successful track record of improving schools. Their support for the new leadership team in improving teaching is effective, particularly because it is integrated into the school improvement plan. While contributing strongly to improvements in classroom practice, it is also building subject leaders’ capacity to carry on this work independently.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire Local Authority.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion