Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by The Caldecott Foundation Limited in Kent
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
22 Jan 2013
- Inspectors verified
Sophie Wood
- URN verified
SC037309
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children and young people are being extremely well looked after by well-trained staff under the strong leadership of a competent Registered Manager. p.4
- They speak of excellent support and guidance which is further underpinned by thorough induction processes. p.4
- Much of this success is attributed to the excellent relationships which exist between the staff and young people. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. p.4
- The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales. p.4
- To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s): p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies2
“Good quality records demonstrate that good progress is being made.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 713
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC037309 Inspection date 22/01/2013 Inspector Sophie Wood Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 11/07/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This private children's home is registered to provide care and accommodation for nine children. The home is run by a charitable organisation.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
At the full inspection in July 2012 the home was judged good overall. One requirement and two recommendations were made and the home has successfully addressed two of these.
p.3
Progress
The provider was required to ensure the Registered Manager be provided with regular and on-going supervision. This is now occurring and provides better opportunities to support the manager and to continue to evaluate her role.
p.3
Progress
The manager was asked to review behaviour management guidance, specifically with regards to the use of physical restraint techniques to prevent absconding. Such guidance now offers greater clarity and individual risk assessments are much more precise. Interventions now ensure the safety of individuals; greater protection is now afforded to all.
p.3
Progress
The provider was asked to improve upon the quality of the home's quality assurance processes, in particular, Regulation 33 and 34 monitoring. New formats with regards to Regulation 33 visits are being developed to better reflect the quality of the care provided and the manager is regularly monitoring the home in accordance with Regulation 34. Such processes are yet to become embedded and it is therefore not yet possible to measure their effectiveness or impact upon improving the quality of the service. Although Regulation 34 reports are being completed, administrative errors appear to be responsible for these not being submitted to Ofsted. A requirement is now made to address this shortfall which hinders the regulator's ability to effectively monitor the service.
p.3
Progress
Young people remain happy and settled within the home. Those newcomers at the previous inspection talk of now feeling safe and settled. Good quality records demonstrate that good progress is being made. Much of this success is attributed to the excellent relationships which exist between the staff and young people.
p.4
Progress
New staff members also settle into post very quickly. They speak of excellent support and guidance which is further underpinned by thorough induction processes. Records pertaining to staff induction are of a very good quality. Children and young people are being extremely well looked after by well-trained staff under the strong leadership of a competent Registered Manager.
p.4
Progress
The organisation continues to develop improved consultation processes with its workforce. On-going training opportunities increase the skills and knowledge of the staff team. One example is the manager's recent completion of the Level 5 Diploma in Leadership for Health and Social Care and Children and Young People's services.
p.4
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) the registered person shall supply to the HMCI a report in respect of any review conducted by him for the purposes of paragraph (1), and make a copy of the report available on request to placing authorities where the placing authority is not the parent of a child accommodated in the home. (Regulation 34 (2) 22/02/2013
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion