Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Daniel Towl
- Postcode verified
RG41 1JR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 713
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Louisa Gurney Headteacher Emmbrook Junior School Emmbrook Road Wokingham RG41 1JR
p.1
Education act 2005 to Emmbrook Junior School
Following my visit to your school on 12 February 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Emmbrook Junior School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit meetings were held with the headteacher, senior and middle leaders, members of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority. The school’s action plans for improvement were evaluated. HMI reviewed information about pupils’ progress and the outcomes of senior leaders’ monitoring of teaching.
p.1
Context
There have been no significant changes to the school’s context since the last section 5 inspection.
p.1
Main findings
The headteacher and school leaders, including governors, have fully grasped the issues raised in the last section 5 inspection and have correctly focussed most of their early efforts to secure consistently good teaching across the school as quickly Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 3115319 Direct F 0117 3150430 Direct email :matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com as possible. There is a growing sense of the whole school moving in the same direction and a willingness to improve.
p.1
Main findings
More focussed and rigorous lesson observations and coaching and support for teachers are helping to raise the quality teaching. Inconsistencies in teaching have been identified and acted upon. Teachers’ performance management is sharper and leading to clear targets for improvement. Underpinning the school’s improvement is a much more robust analysis of pupils’ progress. Senior leaders are very aware of the performance of different groups of pupils, including those who are eligible for Pupil Premium funding (government money for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, children from service families and those children who are looked after).
p.2
Main findings
Middle leaders are developing a better understanding about the expectations of their role in school improvement. They are beginning to take on more responsibility for managing their teams and reporting more clearly on the effectiveness of their work.
p.2
Main findings
School action plans cover the key areas requiring improvement but would benefit from sharper timescales, clearer ‘milestones for success’ and tighter connections between the post inspection plan and the school improvement plan.
p.2
Main findings
There have been recent changes to the membership of the Governing Body. Governors are developing a range of activities to ensure that they can find out more efficiently and effectively how well the school is improving. Their work is better coordinated and already beginning to provide the information needed to enable them to ask informed and challenging questions of the headteacher and senior leaders. The governing body has already improved its knowledge of key information about the progress of different groups of pupils.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
Consolidate the post-inspection action planning to: - give sharper timescales for key ‘milestones to success’. - clarify links between post inspection planning, the overall school plan and the schools’ performance targets about improving the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress.
p.2
Main findings
Review the work of the governing body in twelve months to check the effectiveness of its new procedures.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The headteacher and governors are using a wide range of external support and initiatives. The local authority leads a school improvement board that meets once per term at the school to check on the progress of plans. A further range of external support from the local authority, an advanced skill teacher and a Local Leader in Education are beginning to have a positive impact on raising the expertise of staff.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Wokingham and as below.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion