Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Mar 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Yaxley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Yaxley

  • Postcode verified

    NR19 2PW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressstrengthsconsistenteffectiveclearly
Criticismweaknessesnot clearabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
788
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Grahame Chambers Headteacher Scarning Voluntary Controlled Primary School Dereham Road Scarning Dereham Norfolk NR19 2PW

p.1

Education act 2005 to Scarning Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 15 February 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Scarning Voluntary Controlled Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and acting deputy headteacher, subject leaders for English and mathematics, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body and a staff governor, and the school’s local authority Achievement and Intervention Advisor. The Senior Advisor for Improvement and Development attended the feedback at the end of the day. The school action plan and governing body action plan were evaluated. A brief visit was made to each classroom.

p.1

Context

At the time of the inspection in November, the headteacher of Mattishall Primary School was supporting the school during the temporary absence of the headteacher. The headteacher is now back in school and links with the local school continue, including some joint training for staff. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9160 Direct email : antony.grace@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

Senior staff and the governing body believe the inspection report to be a true reflection of the strengths and weaknesses of the school and took swift action to address the areas that need improvement. In particular, leaders recognise two important things as central to further improvement. First, staff must be consistent in their planning and approach to pupils’ learning. Discussions amongst staff resulted in agreement on non-negotiables in the planning and delivery of lessons, and in the marking of pupils’ work. The leader for mathematics has worked with staff to develop a policy to provide pupils with a consistent approach to learning methods of calculation. The policy will be implemented within the next few weeks. Second, staff at all levels of responsibility must be held accountable for pupils’ progress. The headteacher and senior staff accept that they have not been used to being challenged in the past, and that they have not provided sufficient challenge to

p.2

Main findings

others. Although uncomfortable at times, the headteacher and governors report that greater accountability and challenge are welcomed by teachers and senior staff. To make sure that teachers have the information that they need about pupils’ progress, assessment arrangements have been tightened up and training provided. The governors took immediate action to make sure that they know more about pupils’ performance. They have a new Strategic Committee. They have been trained by local authority advisors to interpret national data and have already used what they have learned to ask some searching questions of the headteacher.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has an action plan, sensibly based on an audit of their skills, in tandem with the school’s most important priorities. The school’s action plan addresses the priorities appropriately but needs smartening up. It is not clear who is responsible for taking actions, who checks what is happening or who decides whether the results are good enough. Although pupils’ targets are based on what they must achieve for progress to be good, the plan does not use these targets to measure success clearly enough.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommends that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 sharpen the school action plan by clarifying the roles of staff, and using pupils’ targets to measure the success of the planned actions.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The work of the local authority advisor and the collaboration with a local school are well set up to provide challenge and, importantly, to make sure that the ownership of actions and improvements sits firmly with the headteacher and governors at Scarning. The support is welcomed and is helping the school to focus on what it takes for pupils to achieve good progress and high standards. Training for staff has been well-targeted and prompt. As a result, staff are up for the challenge and already making changes or debating how to modify current practice.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion