Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Whitworth Community High School
Summary
Nell Banfield (lead), Fiona Dixon, Gary Kirkley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 Feb 2013
- Inspectors verified
Fiona Dixon, Gary Kirkley, Nell Banfield
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
OL12 8TS
- Name on report verified
Whitworth Community High School
- URN verified
119753
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- This is because leaders have clear expectations about students being smart, polite and considerate to each other. p.5
- The views expressed by parents, students and staff indicate the majority are positive about the school, and feel confident about taking part in after-school sports clubs and events. p.5
- This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- It is also targeted at students in Key Stage 3 and those in Year 7 who arrive at the school with gaps in their knowledge or weaker understanding in mathematics and/or English. p.6
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There was an unanticipated decline in GCSE examination results English in 2012. p.1
- Teaching has not been consistently good over time and not enough students have made good progress. p.1
- Although teaching is now improving rapidly, not all students are learning effectively, because in some classes the same work is set for all students whatever their ability. p.1
- Some lessons taught by temporary or non- specialist teachers do not help students to understand what is being taught. p.1
- The progress of some students has been limited because they have had a change of teacher part way through a course of study. p.1
- Students do not always have the opportunity to find things out for themselves and are sometimes too reliant on the teacher for explanations and answers to questions. p.1
- Marking and feedback from teachers does not always explain clearly how students can improve their skills and their learning. p.1
- The curriculum does not meet the needs of all p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,568
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Whitworth Community High School Hall Fold, Whitworth, Rochdale, Lancashire, OL12 8TS
p.1
Inspection dates 31 January–1 February 2013
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
There was an unanticipated decline in GCSE examination results English in 2012. Teaching has not been consistently good over time and not enough students have made good progress. Although teaching is now improving rapidly, not all students are learning effectively, because in some classes the same work is set for all students whatever their ability. Some lessons taught by temporary or non- specialist teachers do not help students to understand what is being taught. The progress of some students has been limited because they have had a change of teacher part way through a course of study. Students do not always have the opportunity to find things out for themselves and are sometimes too reliant on the teacher for explanations and answers to questions. Marking and feedback from teachers does not always explain clearly how students can improve their skills and their learning. The curriculum does not meet the needs of all
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
the students, including those who are interested in vocational subjects.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Teaching is improving rapidly so that more students are making better progress. Leaders and managers are clear and rigorous in their self-evaluation, know exactly what the school needs to do to improve further and their actions are accelerating students’ progress. The majority of students behave well in lessons and around the school. Subject leaders, especially those who are new to the role are working energetically to improve progress. Governors understand the school well, are relentless in their support and challenge and are working closely with school leaders to make sure the school continues to improve rapidly.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The inspection team observed 31 lessons, of which two were joint observations with the assistant headteacher. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior staff, students, the Chair of the Governing Body, the vice-chair and a parent governor, and held a telephone discussion with the local authority representative. The inspection team looked closely at the school’s work, scrutinised the school’s data about the students’ achievements, examined records relating to behaviour, safety and attendance and looked at documents written by school leaders to review the quality of the school’s work and their plans of how to improve further. Inspectors took account of 39 responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) and four letters received during the inspection. Inspectors also took account of the views of 36 staff who returned inspection questionnaires.
p.2
Inspection team
Nell Banfield, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Gary Kirkley Additional Inspector Fiona Dixon Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Whitworth Community High School is a smaller than average size secondary school. The proportion of students known to be eligible for the pupil premium, which provides additional funding for children in the care of the local authority, for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and those who are the children of service families, is in line with that found nationally. Very few students are from minority ethnic groups. Most students are of White British heritage and very few are in the early stages of learning to speak English as an additional language. The proportion of disabled students and those with special educational needs is below that found nationally. The proportion of students supported through school action, school action plus and with a statement of special educational needs is below average. A very small number of students in Year 10 and Year 11 attend Oswaldtistle Short Stay School
p.3
Information about this school
and a small number follow vocational courses at Accrington and Rossendale College. The school’s recent GCSE results met the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Make sure that all teaching is good and more is outstanding by checking that all teachers: plan and teach activities for students at different starting points, so that can all move to the next stage of learning in a lesson improve the quality of their marking in all subjects and give students time to think about and respond to advice so their work improves create more opportunities for students to discuss their ideas and answers in a group or in pairs and to find out information for themselves, rather than rely on the teacher to tell them include activities in their lessons that so students have the chance to explain their thinking, describe their ideas and justify their views and opinions.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Implement plans from the curriculum review so that all students make better progress in a range of subjects and achieve at least good standards in examinations by: providing examination courses in a range of subjects that meet the needs of students with different abilities providing vocational courses so that students can gain qualifications that will prepare them well for future employment.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Reduce the number of non-specialist and temporary teachers so that students’ progress in lessons improves.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Achievement requires improvement because students do not do as well in English as in other subjects. Attainment has improved in mathematics, science, modern foreign languages, physical education, art and performing arts in 2012 reflecting improvements to the quality of teaching. The proportion of students achieving five A* to C grades, including English and mathematics, and the proportion gaining Grade C in English, declined in 2012 to below the national average, although it was close to the national average in the previous year. This was because fewer students gained grade C and above in English than in previous years. The school responded promptly to this and students are now making better progress in English lessons because teachers are clearer what students need to know and be able to do in order to achieve the standards required for each GCSE grade. When students join the school in Year 7, they are working at the same standards as is found
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
nationally in most subjects. In the past, the school did not act quickly enough to identify and address underachievement and this has slowed the progress of some students. Additionally some teachers adopt a ‘one size fits all’ approach. They do make sure that students of different abilities are set work that meets their individual needs. This, along with frequent changes of teacher, has also contributed to uneven progress. The gap between the performances of students who are known to be eligible for free school meals and that of their peers in the school, as measured by their average point scores at GCSE, is larger than that found nationally, because work was not well matched to their learning styles and abilities. The school has improved the procedures for identifying those students eligible for the pupil premium who are in danger of falling behind, and are providing extra help and support for this group of students. As a result, their progress is improving rapidly.
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
The progress of disabled students and those who have special educational needs is good because the school makes sure that all possible additional help is provided. Reading is highly promoted by the school. Students read regularly in form time and those requiring additional help improve their reading skills and make good progress. One Year 7 student spoken to said his reading had improved rapidly as a result of the school’s support. The school’s range of courses does not yet provide all students with opportunities to succeed and as a result, some students do not make the progress of which they are capable. The small number of students who access education off the school site make good progress because they are closely monitored and are following courses that match their interests and talents.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Teaching in the majority of lessons seen by inspectors was good, but teaching is not good over time. A thorough review of teaching by the school confirms that teaching was not good enough in the past. The school has responded swiftly to this and teaching is now rapidly improving. Not all lessons are taught by specialist teachers, so some students do not make good progress because these staff do not have the in-depth knowledge of the subject they are being asked to teach. In some of the lessons that required improvement, students were taught by temporary teachers and were not clear what they were to learn. Some were confused about, or lacked confidence in, the tasks they had to complete and some more-able students repeated work or answered questions about processes and topics they already understood. In some lessons, students were too reliant on the teacher and the teacher’s explanations. They
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
were not able to contribute to their learning by finding out about things for themselves or by discussing or presenting their knowledge and opinions. This limited the development of their communication skills. In good lessons, students were given carefully chosen tasks which meant they had to work together to solve a problem. In one mathematics lesson, students were asked to complete one line each in turn to solve an algebra question. This made them explain to their co-worker what they had done and why before their partner completed their line. They had to agree it was correct before proceeding. Students built up their confidence and clarified misconceptions through this task. In the better lessons, teachers ask searching questions which make students think carefully before answering and encourage students to check their own and each others’ work Many teachers make sure that students are clear about how to reach the standards of which
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
they are capable and support them well. Students do better than they thought they could because of the teachers’ high expectations and the way they instil self-belief. Students with weaker reading skills make good progress in literacy as a result of well-focused support. Most teachers practise the reading, spelling and understanding of key technical terms in their subjects and also comment on the grammar and spelling in students’ writing. A small number of teachers do not yet mark students’ work thoroughly enough. Senior leaders have begun to make sure that all teachers provide feedback on learning. As a result, more students not only know what they have done well and which targets they have met, but respond to suggestions as to how they can reach the next stage.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The majority of students behave well in lessons and around the school. Inattention in lessons is rare and usually occurs when teachers talk for too long, when students do not understand the work or when tasks are too easy. Students say that behaviour has improved in recent years and that it is good. This is because leaders have clear expectations about students being smart, polite and considerate to each other. The school has introduced a room where students who are struggling to settle in lessons can complete their work without disturbing the learning of others. Students feel safe and cared for well. They are confident about raising any concerns they have with tutors, mentors and teaching assistants. Almost all students attend school regularly and persistent absence has reduced over time. Very few students are excluded from school because there are support staff who talk to them about their behaviour and help them to settle disputes, and because there is a clear behaviour
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
policy which most teachers follow consistently. Discrimination for example, through racist or homophobic language, is not tolerated. On the rare occasions when issues do arise, students say that senior staff take immediate action. A very small number of incidents of name calling are not settled right away and it may take a little longer before they are fully resolved. Disabled students, those who have special educational needs and students from different ethnic groups socialise and study well with other students. Students understand the damaging impact of bullying and students say that many help younger students who might feel unsure around the school. The vast majority of students are clear about how technology can be used to bully and intimidate and say that occasions where mobile phones and the internet are misused are rare. A student involved in one incident was made aware of the seriousness of his actions and the incidents stopped.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The views expressed by parents, students and staff indicate the majority are positive about the school, and feel confident about taking part in after-school sports clubs and events. A few parents, students and staff felt that a minority of students did not always behave as well as the majority. A number were aware that the changes in teaching staff in some subjects had not always helped students to do their best. The school’s ethos and curriculum supports students to develop their spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding. Students’ understanding of other lifestyles and religions is developed through visits to different religious centres and a stronger link is being established with a multi- cultural school close by so students can share activities and discussions regularly. In lessons, students discuss the context of different musical traditions, explore what life is like in shanty towns, increase their understanding of how the Kuna Indians use their textile traditions to
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
support their economy and explore the deeper meaning of war and why conflicts happen.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The headteacher and senior leaders have taken decisive steps to examine the reasons behind the decline in attainment in 2012 and to improve students’ achievement. As a result, the progress of higher ability students in science has improved, a higher proportion of students eligible for the pupil premium are on track to achieve national standards and the pace of improvement in the quality of teaching has accelerated. Newly appointed subject leaders, and particularly the leader of English, are already improving students’ progress. The checks made on lessons is rigorous and evaluation of the quality of teaching is accurate. Senior leaders recognise that all teaching should be planned and taught by teachers who have a good knowledge and understanding of the subject they are teaching, and are taking steps to ensure that this is so. They are relentless in appointing staff of the highest quality. The headteacher has sought additional capacity to improve the accuracy of assessments. The
p.6
The leadership and management are good
school now knows exactly where there may be underachievement and has used the pupil premium funding wisely to pay for extra support. The funds have been used to appoint skilled staff to help students to do well in tests and in examinations and to teach topics that might have been missed or misunderstood. It is also targeted at students in Key Stage 3 and those in Year 7 who arrive at the school with gaps in their knowledge or weaker understanding in mathematics and/or English. This illustrates the school’s commitment to promoting equality of opportunity. The school recognises that the curriculum does not enable all students to make the best progress because it is not designed to match carefully the interests and abilities of the full range of students, particularly those who wish to study vocational subjects. The school has already introduced some additional subjects and plans to extend the range further for students in the
p.6
The leadership and management are good
near future. Performance management has not been rigorous in the past. However, robust links are now made between the outcomes for students to teachers’ progression through the pay scales. The local authority has provided well-targeted support, which has helped the school to improve the quality of teaching. The school’s arrangements for keeping students safe meet all statutory requirements. The governance of the school: Governors are clear about what needs to improve, the steps the school has taken to improve teaching and why. The school’s use of the pupil premium funding is closely monitored by governors and they have scrutinised data that compares the low previous attainment and the recently improved progress of the groups of pupils across the school supported by this funding. All governors have a good understanding of data because they attend training which is frequently updated. The governing body has a clear action plan to target training so that it
p.6
The leadership and management are good
matches the school development plan and also plans to attend school council and staff meetings so that students and staff are clear who the governors are and what they do. Governors recognise that the arrangements for managing the performance of staff were not sufficiently rigorous in the past and fully endorse the headteacher’s actions to link any increase in pay to improved performance.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 119753 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 405886
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 489 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Lila Towers Headteacher Margaret Holt Date of previous school inspection 11 May 2011 Telephone number 01706 343218 Fax number 01706 759850 Email address office@whitworth.lancs.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion