Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Mar 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gill Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gill Jones

  • Postcode verified

    RM16 6SA

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+19Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstronghigh qualitysupportiveeffectiveclearimprovingkeen
Criticismweaknessesweaknot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings397w+19
  • What needs to improve190w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
586
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%What needs to improve 32%

Full report text

Mr Michael Lovett Principal Harris Primary Academy Chafford Hundred Mayflower Road Chafford Hundred Grays RM16 6SA

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the

Education act 2005 to Harris Primary Academy, Chafford Hundred.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the

Following my visit to your school on 6 February 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with staff and with the Director of Primary Education for the Harris Academy Federation, who is also a governor of the school. The school action plan was evaluated. The inspector carried out brief visits to lessons, accompanied by senior staff, where she spoke to teachers and pupils, looked at the displays in the corridors and classrooms and at the work in pupils’ exercise books.

p.1

Context

There have been no staff changes since the previous inspection.

p.1

Main findings

The school is making reasonable progress towards becoming a good school. It has a clear action plan to tackle the main weaknesses identified at the last inspection in Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 679 9158 Direct email :rachel.dayan@serco.com November 2012. The Director of Primary Education for Harris is challenging the school well to ensure the plan covers the main issues that the school needs to improve quickly. Reasonable timescales are set for improvement and there is a strong focus on evaluating the progress made towards improving the quality of teaching rapidly.

p.1

Main findings

Senior staff are willing to drive improvements in teaching. However, they do not set their sights high enough and remain too accepting of weak teaching. They do not routinely check that staff implement the new policies agreed to improve the quality of teaching. For example, in some classrooms the teachers’ spelling and handwriting are incorrect in pupils’ exercise books and on the white board. Not all the phase leaders are building on the support from Harris advisers well enough to improve teaching in their phase of the academy.

p.2

Main findings

The leadership of the school recognises the urgent need for improvement and is keen to raise standards in the quality of teaching. It is supportive of staff. It has started to act on the areas of improvement identified at the last inspection. However, leadership is not yet dynamic or proactive enough in ensuring that all staff make the required changes to improve the quality of teaching. This means that pupils are not yet on track to reach the highest standards or to make the progress of which they are capable.

p.2

Main findings

The sponsor has begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 Ensure the senior team observe outstanding teaching and learning in other schools, so that they raise their expectations of what it is possible to achieve.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school is receiving high quality support from advisers within the Harris Federation to tackle the areas for improvement.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion