Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Millhouse Primary School

Inspected 7 Feb 2013 · published 4 Mar 2013 · URN 106586

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Feb 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Jim Alexander

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    S36 9LN

  • Name on report verified

    Millhouse Primary School

  • URN verified

    106586

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentmake good progressgood progressimprovedexceptionallyeffectiveenjoy
Criticisminadequateweaknessesrequires improvementnot yetlowseriousinconsistenciesnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1122w+78
  • Leadership662w+31
  • What needs to improve84w+69

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,793
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Millhouse Primary School Lea Lane , Millhouse Green, Penistone, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S36 9LN

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils achieve well and make good progress in their lessons and over time.  Good and sometimes outstanding teaching motivates pupils to do their best. Teachers, skilfully supported by well-trained and experienced support staff, establish a purposeful atmosphere in lessons.  Teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage helps children to make good progress in their reading, writing and number work; they make outstanding progress developing their personal and social skills.  The curriculum has been carefully planned with good links between subjects. Pupils say they find their work ‘fun and relevant’.  The school is a safe and harmonious community where pupils’ behaviour is consistently good. They enjoy all this improving school has to offer. Attendance is high and continues to improve.  Leaders across the school, including governors, want the best for the pupils. They use data effectively to identify those who could be

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

making better progress and then provide the right support to help them improve.  Since the last inspection leaders have taken robust action to ensure the quality of teaching has improved significantly.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Teaching is not yet strong enough to ensure all pupils make the best possible progress across the school. As a result, achievement is higher in reading and writing than it is in mathematics.  Although some marking of pupils’ work is excellent and helps them to understand how to improve, this is not consistent across the school.  Leaders are currently redeveloping the way in which younger pupils use phonics (letters and sounds) to help them read, as best practice is not firmly established across Key Stage 1.  Leaders recognise that some opportunities to systematically engage with the wider community need to be strengthened.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspector observed 10 lessons and small-group activities. Three of the observations were jointly conducted with the headteacher.  Meetings were held with governors, senior leaders, school staff and a representative from the local authority.  The inspector talked to pupils in lessons about their work, looked at books, listened to younger pupils read and talked to a group of pupils from Key Stage 2.  The inspector took account of 21 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) and a number of letters and emails sent during the inspection, and spoke to parents at the start of the second day.  The inspector took account of 11 questionnaires returned by members of staff.  The inspector observed the school’s work and looked at progress data, performance management information and records relating to behaviour and attendance, as well as documents relating to safeguarding.

p.2

Inspection team

Jim Alexander, Lead inspector Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This is smaller than the average sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils supported by school action is above average.  The proportion of pupils supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also above average.  All pupils are from a White British heritage.  The proportion known to be eligible for the pupil premium funding is below average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  Since the time of the last inspection the school has appointed a new assistant headteacher and two new teachers. Four new teaching assistants have also been appointed. The governing body has appointed five new members and elected a new Chair.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching so all is consistently good, and a greater proportion is outstanding, by:  ensuring that teachers’ marking always shows pupils how to improve their work and that pupils act quickly on that guidance  helping pupils make equally good progress in their mathematics as they do in their reading and writing  further strengthening the teaching of phonics (letters and sounds) in Key Stage 1.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve opportunities to systematically engage with parents and the wider school community.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage with skills that are generally well below those typically expected for their age. Communication, language and number skills are particularly low. They are helped to make good progress and are well prepared for the smooth transition into Year 1.  Pupils read regularly and enjoy a wide range of interesting and challenging books. This helps them make generally good progress. Following recent assessments, however, leaders have reviewed how well pupils use what they know of letters and sounds to help them read tricky words. Teachers recognise that some of the younger pupils could make even faster progress. Staff training in phonics is complete and a new system is ready to be introduced.  At the time of the last inspection pupils’ attainment by the end of Year 2 was exceptionally low. It has improved significantly since then and is now broadly in line with the national average. This

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

now represents good progress from pupils’ starting points.  Attainment by the end of Key Stage 2, while broadly average overall and representing good progress, is higher in reading and writing than it is in mathematics.  The school has introduced a number of changes to the way mathematics is taught. This is helping pupils make much faster progress than previously. However, some inconsistencies remain. For example, pupils in Year 3 and Year 6 are now making excellent progress, while progress for pupils in Year 4 has not improved so quickly.  Well-tailored support for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs help them make good and often outstanding progress from their low starting points.  Those pupils who are supported by extra funding through the pupil premium are provided for in small-group and one-to-one activities. This is helping them to also make good progress, so that any gaps in their previous attainment are quickly closing.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is good and some is outstanding. Teachers plan enjoyable lessons that meet the needs and interests of pupils well. As a result, pupils are enthusiastic and keen to learn. They particularly appreciate ‘how well teachers link subjects together and make lessons practical’.  Teachers ensure that pupils do not spend too much time sitting and listening but quickly settle to work that is set just at the right level. This helps to effectively develop their independence.  Teachers are supported by highly experienced teaching assistants, who are always very clear about what is required to help pupils make good progress in the time available.  Across the school the quality of marking is good but can vary from class to class. When marking is at its best, for example in Class 4, pupils explain that ‘it really helps us know what we need to do to get our work even better’. However, some marking, while praising pupils’ efforts, offers

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

less in the way of constructive guidance about how to improve. There are other examples where pupils have been told about what steps to take but they have then not acted quickly enough to implement the changes required.  Children are taught well in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Activities are carefully planned to support all areas of learning, both indoors and outside. Children are encouraged to be independent, taking responsibility for their own learning. Adults use questions well to challenge and extend children’s understanding.  Throughout the school, the impact of teaching on pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is strong. This helps pupils develop good attitudes to their work and they encourage one another to do their best.

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils enjoy school and appreciate the variety of sporting and musical activities available. They also speak highly of how well they all get on together, explaining that, when disagreements do occur, they are resolved quickly.  Older pupils recognise how much the school has improved in recent years and say, ‘Teachers make sure our lessons aren’t dull but are exciting and fun’.  Pupils generally have positive attitudes towards learning, listen sensibly to each other’s opinions and show respect for adults.  This explains why pupils’ excellent attendance continues to improve. All parents who completed the online survey agreed that their children are safe and well looked after.  The number of exclusions is very low and incidents of bullying are rare. Pupils are informed about all types of bullying and know how to keep themselves safe, for example when using the internet.  Around school and at playtimes pupils are polite and friendly, accepting responsibility well.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 A few pupils, who have particular emotional needs or behavioural difficulties, receive good support so that they learn to manage their feelings well. Parents speak very highly of this aspect of the school’s work.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 The determined leadership and high expectations of the headteacher, together with a united staff team, have ensured that this school has improved significantly since the last inspection.  The headteacher has successfully eradicated inadequate teaching and now ensures it is of a good standard. Lessons are checked regularly and feedback is provided. This helps teachers know how to improve the quality of their work.  Since the time of the last inspection leaders have redesigned the curriculum. There are now clear links between subjects, so skills learnt in one area can be reinforced in another. Pupils enjoy the weekly enrichment lessons where, for example, they learn to bake. Staff ‘go the extra mile’ to ensure pupils in this small school are provided with many musical and sporting opportunities.  Senior leaders ensure that responsibilities for checking and analysing information on pupils’ progress are shared more widely among teachers. This enables everyone to play an active part

p.5

The leadership and management are good

in supporting developments.  The school benefits from effective, well-tailored support provided by the local authority. This partnership has helped to secure improvements since the time of the last inspection.  Leaders have allocated the pupil premium funding in a wide variety of ways. For example, additional tuition and small-group activities before and after main teaching sessions are just one example of the school’s commitment to equality of opportunity for all pupils.  Performance management arrangements are effective. Leaders identify teachers’ strengths and weaknesses by using a wide range of evidence and then provide effective support to ensure teaching improves. The headteacher’s judgements about the quality of lessons are accurate and the inspector observed the effective feedback each teacher received.  The governance of the school:  Governors bring a range of skills and expertise to help them lead the school. They know how

p.5

The leadership and management are good

well the school is performing in relation to other schools across the country. This information is used, alongside looking at work in pupils’ books and observing the work of the school, to gain a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and what needs to be improved. They use the information from the performance management procedures to ensure only teachers who meet the teachers’ standards are considered for annual pay awards. They are aware of the positive effect of the use of the pupil premium on pupils’ progress. Safeguarding arrangements are met. The vast majority of parents speak very positively about the improvements they have seen at the school. A small number, however, remain concerned about how well the school communicates with them or takes their views into account. Leaders recognise the need to ensure engagement with all parents is as good as possible. This aspect has been identified in

p.5

The leadership and management are good

the school’s development plan and a named governor is now overseeing developments .

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 106586 Local authority Barnsley Inspection number 400850

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 90 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Irene Gorsden Headteacher Gary Mangham Date of previous school inspection 1 December 2009 Telephone number 01226 763019 Fax number 01226 763019 Email address g.mangham@barnsley.org guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion