Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Malden Oaks School and Tuition Service

Inspected 7 Feb 2013 · published 4 Mar 2013 · URN 102562

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lesley Cox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Feb 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Lesley Cox

  • Postcode verified

    KT2 5QY

  • Name on report verified

    Malden Oaks PRU

  • URN verified

    102562

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progressoutstandinghigh-qualityrapid progresspositiveimprovedeffectivestrong
Criticisminadequategapsweaknessespoorrequires improvementseriousnot outstandinglacking

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1327w+46
  • Leadership866w+37
  • What needs to improve146w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,268
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 41%Leadership 27%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Malden Oaks PRU The Dukes Centre, Dukes Avenue, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 5QY

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  The new headteacher has high expectations of students and staff. She has planned carefully for further improvements and has made a significant impact on teaching and learning in the short time she has been in post.  Teaching is consistently good. Teachers work hard to support the different needs of their students and are skilful in finding the best way to help them catch up with their learning.  Students achieve well and start to make good progress as soon as they join the centre. Gaps in learning are quickly identified and students can make rapid progress because of the personalised learning timetables they are offered.  Students are supported to improve their reading, writing, communication and mathematical skills through carefully planned activities.  The centre is highly valued by schools and other organisations. It has a proven record of success in helping students to overcome the

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

difficulties they face and encouraging them to re-engage with education.  Relationships at the centre are very positive. Students feel cared for and supported and are encouraged to support each other. Instances of poor behaviour are very rare and there are high levels of respect and tolerance for each other.  The management committee is increasingly involved in driving forward improvement. It works closely with the local authority to support and challenge the headteacher and her staff.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because:

 Not enough teaching is outstanding because lessons are sometimes too tightly controlled by teachers and do not challenge students to achieve more.  Some students do not continue with their placements in education and training on leaving the centre and cannot maintain the improvements they had made there.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspector observed seven lessons taught by five different teachers. One lesson was jointly observed with the headteacher. A presentation to students from a health professional was attended. A number of shorter visits to lessons and personalised learning sessions took place. The inspector looked at students’ work, teachers’ planning and evidence of progress for lessons that she was unable to observe during the inspection.  There were only six responses to the online parental questionnaire, so account was also taken of the centre’s own parental surveys and correspondence.  Six staff questionnaires were returned.  Meetings and discussions were held with the headteacher, the centre coordinator, other staff, the Chair of the Management Committee, a leader from a partner secondary school and a representative from the local authority. Discussions took place with students in lessons and during break and lunchtimes.

p.2

Information about this inspection

 The inspector looked at the centre’s checks on how well it is doing and development plans, teachers’ planning and assessment files, examples of students’ work, policies and procedures, management committee minutes and attendance records. Safeguarding records and other documents were evaluated.

p.2

Inspection team

Lesley Cox, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The Malden Oaks is a pupil referral unit (PRU) which provides alternative education for students in Key Stages 3 and 4 who have diagnosed medical, mental health, behavioural or anxiety conditions. At the time of the inspection 20 students were on roll at the centre. All students have personalised learning plans which aim to help them re-engage with their education.  Students have dual registration with their secondary schools during their time at Malden Oaks.  A new headteacher has been appointed from September 2012.  Malden Oaks works as part of a federation with Mecklenburg PRU within the same local authority. They share the headteacher and management committee. Some staff work across both centres. Mecklenburg PRU was inspected independently at the same time as this inspection.  Students sometimes attend alternative education providers such as Kingston College and Merton College. Placements are usually arranged by the students’ secondary school. A few students

p.3

Information about this school

have additional work placements arranged by the centre.  The centre works in close partnership with all the secondary schools within the local authority, health agencies and educational welfare services.  All students have behavioural, emotional or social difficulties and are at school action plus on the special educational needs register. Ten students have been eligible for the pupil premium additional funding so far this year, although this number changes on a regular basis.  The length of time students spend at Malden Oaks varies greatly. Reintegration back to mainstream or special schools is sought whenever possible but some students remain at the centre for longer periods of time.  Most students are of White British heritage. There are usually a small number of students in the care of the local authority at any given time.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching so that more is outstanding by:  encouraging students to take a greater responsibility for their own learning by finding things out for themselves and providing them with more opportunities to work without direct supervision in lessons  planning more lessons that include exciting and creative activities that capture the imagination of students and encourage them to join in  asking more challenging questions that provoke able students to make a higher level of contribution to lessons.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Reduce the number of students who are not in education, employment or training after they leave the centre by:  maintaining and developing stronger links with colleges and training providers to support students after they have left the centre.  providing higher quality information, advice and guidance and supporting students to visit and explore placement opportunities so that they are more confident in these placements.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students arrive at the centre having missed considerable amounts of schooling due to the health, social and emotional difficulties that they face. As a result there are often large gaps in their knowledge and understanding. Most are severely lacking in confidence with poor levels of motivation. The centre tackles these barriers to learning by quickly establishing the level that students are working at and planning individual programmes for them. This ensures that they are able to make at least good progress from their starting points.  Most students make significant progress in their personal development and start to re-engage with their learning, closing the gaps between their own achievements and those of other students nationally.  Great emphasis is placed on ensuring that older students are able to gain GCSE passes or other forms of accreditation in as many subjects as they can manage. The proportion gaining

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

examination passes has risen year on year, with nearly all students leaving Year 11 in 2012 with two or more GCSE passes. Some students achieved five passes at GCSE, with three passes being the average. Most students achieved accreditation in English and mathematics at either GCSE or entry level. Accurate tracking indicates that most students will leave with four or more GCSE passes this year.  Some Year 10 students are entered early for an examination if this is felt to be useful in boosting their levels of engagement or confidence. They are able to resit the examination to improve their grade at the end of Year 11. This has been a useful strategy for maximising accreditation over time.  Analysis of assessments and examination results shows that there is little difference in the performance of different groups of students. Those eligible for the pupil premium achieve broadly the same results in examinations, including English and mathematics, as other students.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

This is due to the intensive support offered to them by the centre. The additional funding has been used to provide a wider range of educational activities such as a cooking course and an outdoor education programme. These have improved participation rates of students whose circumstances make them more vulnerable and allowed them to make more progress towards their targets.  Students make good progress in improving their reading, writing, communication and mathematical skills through a planned programme of activities that take place throughout the centre.  Students are supported to attend work placements and college courses if this is agreed as part of their learning plan. This is closely monitored by the centre through regular communication and visits from staff. The progress students make is reviewed regularly to ensure they have the best chance of being successful.  Some older students find it difficult to maintain their improved levels of confidence on leaving

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

the centre and do not always attend the placements they have been offered on college courses. Careful tracking by the centre has identified this as an area for further improvement.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is consistently good and students say they enjoy their lessons. Specialist teachers are skilled at meeting students’ needs through careful planning and appropriate levels of support.  Teachers work hard to build very positive relationships with their students. They give freely of their time both in and outside of lessons. Students often come in before school or stay afterwards to attend additional one-to-one sessions or join in extra-curricular activities such as cooking. This improves their attitudes to learning and rates of attendance.  Teachers use information gathered on entry, school assessments and performance predictions to plan lessons, setting targets that will help students move forwards. They give high-quality written feedback and encouragement so that students know what to do to improve further.  Lessons are fast paced and carefully pitched to ensure that students remain engaged. Teachers

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

ask questions to check understanding but sometimes miss opportunities to stretch more-able students by challenging them to explain more clearly or expand their answers. In some lessons the high levels of support mean that students do not take as much responsibility for their own learning as they could.  All teachers carefully monitor the progress students are making to identify any gaps in their learning. This helps students to improve quickly and many begin to make rapid progress as their levels of confidence, attitudes to learning and attendance patterns change.  All teachers teach reading, writing, communication and mathematics in lessons. This takes the form of reading activities, spelling and number games and the use of individual whiteboards to model written responses. Attractive displays, electronic tablets, books, magazines and newspapers can be found throughout the centre. Students use these during reading sessions at

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

the start of morning and afternoon lessons and are encouraged to read for their own pleasure throughout the day. Careful tracking and targeted support ensure that all students make good progress from their starting points.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Students see the centre as a place in which they are valued and where they can get the help and support they need. The high-quality learning environment, with space for independent and small-group learning, allows students to move around freely without direct adult supervision. They make good use of the facilities on offer at the centre with a high regard for safety.  Students make good progress in improving their attitudes to learning and are polite and supportive of each other. Lessons are rarely disrupted but some students are passive and compliant, rather than actively involved in their learning.  Exclusions are very rare with only one incident last year and no exclusions this year. There are no reported incidents of bullying of any type. Responses from students, staff and parents and carers confirmed that bullying and incidents of poor behaviour were not a concern for them.  Nearly all students make significant improvements on their previous levels of attendance and the

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

effective strategies used by the centre show high levels of individual progress. Attendance rates are monitored carefully and swift interventions are made with the help of other professionals, if improvements are not maintained.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 The new headteacher has lost no time in building on the previous success of the centre and a great deal has already been achieved since her appointment in September. She is resilient, enthusiastic and positive and this encourages others to be the same. She has a supportive and capable team of staff who put students’ achievement and welfare at the core of all they do. They are fully committed to equality of opportunity and work hard to ensure all students make the progress they are capable of, whatever difficulties they face.  All leaders, including middle managers and the management committee, have a common vision and have worked together to agree plans for improvement and prioritise the actions that need to be taken. Since September, the senior leadership team and the management committee have been restructured, the monitoring of teaching and learning has been improved and the curriculum has been expanded to meet the wider needs of students. Leaders evaluate accurately

p.5

The leadership and management are good

and know the centre’s strengths and weaknesses.  Senior leaders and the management committee have effective systems for monitoring staff’s performance and expectations are high. All staff are held to account for the progress of the students they teach and are appropriately rewarded for the roles and responsibilities they hold within the centre. Training is carefully planned to ensure that standards remain high and expertise is increasingly shared between the centre and secondary schools. Responses to the staff questionnaire show that recent changes to the performance management systems at the centre have been well received and appreciated by teachers.  The quality of the curriculum is good. Students can study a range of courses that lead to recognised accreditation. A combination of academic and creative subjects link with high-quality enrichment programmes and alternative provision to create individual timetables. The curriculum

p.5

The leadership and management are good

makes a significant contribution to the students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. The centre has correctly identified that students need to be better prepared for when they leave the centre and has commissioned a destinations project for older students to participate in this year.  Tracking systems are in place to monitor rates of students’ progress, although leaders are aware that these are not as efficient as they might be because they do not link to other information systems within the centre. Progress information is shared regularly with secondary schools to allow them to monitor students’ performance while they attend Malden Oaks.  The centre works very effectively with parents and carers who are invited to regular progress reviews attended by all the professionals working with their child. Links with schools and other agencies are strong and the support that the centre offers is recognised as having a positive

p.6

The leadership and management are good

impact on the lives of many young people.  The centre has been well supported by the local authority whose officers show a strong commitment to meeting the needs of the students who are referred there. They work alongside the headteacher and the management committee to offer challenge and provide advice when needed.  Arrangements for recruiting staff and for keeping students safe at the centre meet statutory requirements.  The governance of the school:  The management committee works closely with centre leaders to ensure that standards are maintained and improvements made when necessary. Members of the committee offer good levels of support and challenge and are closely involved in decision making. This includes deciding how to spend the pupil premium funding and measuring the impact it is having. They have recruited new members who can contribute relevant skills to the different committees they have created. The impact of the new achievement and teaching sub-committee, chaired

p.6

The leadership and management are good

by a secondary school leader, can already be seen in the closer monitoring of teachers’ performance and improved outcomes for students. Committee members are kept well informed by attending appropriate training and reading the detailed reports provided by the headteacher. The committee is well placed to meet the new governance responsibilities that come into effect from April 2013.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 102562 Local authority Kingston upon Thames Inspection number 400557

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Pupil referral unit School category Pupil referral unit Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 20 Appropriate authority The local authority Chair Roger Lowe Headteacher Samantha Axbey Date of previous school inspection 26–27 May 2010 Telephone number 020 8547 6660 Fax number 020 8547 6665 Email address sam.axbey@pru.rbksch.org guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion