Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Educare Adolescent Services Limited in Staffordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
21 Jan 2013
- Inspectors verified
Rachel Ruth Britten
- URN verified
SC371723
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- There is also a continuing lack of regular and effective consultation with young people and stakeholders. p.4
- Nevertheless, the proposed manager has identified weaknesses in admissions impact risk assessments and is giving greater consideration to the appropriate mix of young people in the home. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This includes effective monitoring of the trends, issues and quality of the service. p.5
- Ensure also that young people and stakeholders are regularly involved in contributing to the monitoring and have their views and any concerns seriously taken into account (NMS 21.1) p.5
- This pertains particularly to the placement support plans and behaviour support plans being effective through regular update. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,168
- about usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC371723 Inspection date 21/01/2013 Inspector Rachel Ruth Britten Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 17/09/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This home is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to four young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. The home is privately owned and the organisation operates other children's homes in the area.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last full inspection on 17 September 2012 this service was adjudged as ‘adequate’. Since then the home has maintained sound quality of care and outcomes for young people. There have been significant improvements in the quality of the environment, so that young people all have suitable furniture for private study and can comfortably dine together with staff.
p.3
Progress
There have been four departures of young people during the last four months and only one young person remains in placement since the last inspection. Young people have recently been placed on an emergency and/or short term basis and some placements have ended because the home has not been able to reduce young people's risk taking behaviours or adequately safeguard them. Some young people have returned home at parents' request because they have not wanted their child to continue to be 'looked after' by the local authority. Young people have not always been able to live together positively because of the complexity and variety of their needs and this too has resulted in placement changes for some young people. Young people in placement longer term are struggling to commit to their education and are making only adequate progress in their emotional development, physical health and independence.
p.3
Progress
Young people receive sound care, the quality of which has begun to improve during recent weeks. There have been a number of new staff and rota changes since the last inspection which are yet to significantly benefit young people. New staff are well guided and motivated by the interim managers in the setting and now work longer shifts, providing more consistency of care to young people. However, there are not presently enough qualified and experienced staff to provide good quality care on every shift without interim managers working shifts. In addition, the recommendation made at the last inspection about improving the recording and celebration of young people's time in placement has not been acted upon and is therefore raised again. Similarly, the recommendation about improving the timeliness and quality of personalised care is only partially met. For example, semi- independence work has started with young people where this is appropriate, and
p.4
Progress
clearer boundaries and consistent application of them has recently assisted young people to better understand what is expected of them. However, young people's plans and targets are out of date and are only now being reviewed and shared with them. This holds back their progress and indicates that the quality of care is only adequate.
p.4
Progress
Young people benefit from interim managers who have addressed the requirement and four of the seven recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. The Registered Manager resigned shortly after the inspection and the proposed replacement manager ensured that necessary matters were addressed in the home. This included the appointment of a deputy manager. The proposed manager was also notified to Ofsted and prepared her application for registration whilst continuing in post as manager at another home. The proposed manager and deputy focussed on ensuring that the organisation of the home improved, including the standard of the home's work around the notification of significant events. This improved work has benefitted staff morale and the quality of care in the home. However, during recent weeks, the organisation has been taken over and a policy of 'one manager per home' has been adopted. In the light of this, the deputy manager has been
p.4
Progress
appointed as proposed manager from February 2013. This too has been notified to Ofsted.
p.4
Progress
The leadership and management of the home remains adequate, despite the changes in home manager. The appointed deputy, who is now the proposed manager, is enthusiastic and committed. He has ensured that all new staff are booked onto core training and is liaising with the new head office about how any specialist training will be accessed in a timely way to ensure that specialised needs of young people are properly met. This meets, so far as is presently relevant, the recommendation that was made at the last inspection about training. The proposed manager has also begun work on more rigorous monitoring activity and linking of this to development planning and targets. However, the work done so far does not clearly identify patterns and trends or reach conclusions about the quality of care and key areas where improvements can be made. There is also a continuing lack of regular and effective consultation with young people and stakeholders. As a result,
p.4
Progress
the recommendation made about this at the last inspection is also raised again. Nevertheless, the proposed manager has identified weaknesses in admissions impact risk assessments and is giving greater consideration to the appropriate mix of young people in the home. This aims to ensure that risk-taking behaviours are not exacerbated within the group, for example, by young people going missing together.
p.5
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.5
Recommendations
ensure that the procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the home are effective. This includes effective monitoring of the trends, issues and quality of the service. Ensure also that young people and stakeholders are regularly involved in contributing to the monitoring and have their views and any concerns seriously taken into account (NMS 21.1) improve the timeliness and effectiveness with which staff record, support and encourage young people to collect memorabilia of their time in placement and make a record of significant life events (NMS 22.6) ensure that each child's placement plan is monitored by a key worker who ensures that the requirements of the plan are implemented in the day-to-day care of that child. This pertains particularly to the placement support plans and behaviour support plans being effective through regular update. (NMS 25.2)
p.5
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion