Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Granby Junior School
Summary
Sue Hall (lead), Dennis Brittain, Susan Tabberer
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Feb 2013
- Inspectors verified
Dennis Brittain, Sue Hall, Susan Tabberer
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
DE7 8DX
- Name on report verified
Granby Junior School
- URN verified
112571
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.8
- There has been a strong and successful focus on reading which has a positive impact across all subjects. p.6
- Leadership and governance are effective because they ensure a strong focus on improving teaching and the progress pupils make. p.1
- This is proving very effective and many pupils, including the lower attainers, say they really enjoy reading. p.4
- In all classes, a positive feature is the strong working relationship between staff and pupils. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.8
- Some parts of the building, especially the school house, provide inadequate facilities for their intended purpose, including the staffroom accommodation for over 40 staff. p.6
- Observations and school logs show there have been few incidents of unacceptable behaviour. p.5
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.8
- The school buildings are shabby and poorly maintained. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,230
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Granby Junior School Heanor Road, Ilkeston, DE7 8DX
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
This is good school
Pupils make good progress in English and mathematics. By the time they leave the school, standards are well-above average. Pupils do well in reading. They are supported in this through a regular programme of reading in school and at home. Pupils from all backgrounds are warmly welcomed and those who need the most help are well supported. Teaching is good. Staff have strong working relationships with the pupils and use praise well to boost their confidence. The large majority of pupils behave well and are keen to learn. They know how to keep safe. Leadership and governance are effective because they ensure a strong focus on improving teaching and the progress pupils make.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Teaching is not good or better in every lesson and work is not demanding enough for all abilities in a few lessons. At times, teachers talk too much, which limits the opportunities for pupils to discuss their ideas. Subject leaders do not have many opportunities to check progress. Staff have not always taken opportunities to work with others to identify what else could be improved. The school buildings are shabby and poorly maintained. Premises checks are not followed up well enough to ensure all areas are suitable and stimulating places to work.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 18 lessons, or parts of lessons, including some joint lesson observations with the headteacher. Inspectors also observed group reading activities and listened to individuals read. Inspectors looked at samples of the pupils’ recent work. Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders and the special educational needs coordinator. Discussions took place with groups of pupils, representatives of the governing body and the local authority. Inspectors took account of the views of 23 parents and carers as noted on the online parent questionnaire (Parent View) and 22 responses to the staff questionnaire. They also spoke to several parents during the course of the inspection. Inspector’s observed the school’s work and looked at a number of documents, including: the school’s own data on pupils’ progress, school development planning and monitoring information, records relating to behaviour, attendance, safeguarding, risk assessments of the premises and
p.2
Information about this inspection
the minutes of the governing body’s meetings.
p.2
Inspection team
Sue Hall, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Dennis Brittain Additional Inspector Susan Tabberer Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is a larger than average-sized junior school. Slightly more pupils are known to be eligible for the pupil premium than in most schools. This provides additional funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, the small number in local authority care and those with a parent in the armed services. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs identified at school action is slightly above the national average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is average. About 3% of pupils are from minority ethnic groups. A very small number speak English as an additional language. There is no additional or alternative provision for the pupils away from the school site. During the inspection, 52 pupils from Year 6, two teachers and two support staff were out of school at a residential outdoor education centre.
p.3
Information about this school
The chair and vice chair of the governing body were elected at the last governors meeting. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Make sure that teaching is always at least good and increase the amount that is outstanding by: checking that all lessons contain demanding work for all groups of pupils limiting the amount of time teachers talk directly to the class, and providing pupils with more opportunities to develop their own ideas and speaking skills.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the checks made on the work of the school by: providing subject leaders with more opportunities to check the planning of learning and the quality of teaching so they can identify areas for further improvement ensuring staff visit other schools and work with advisers to develop a more rigorous approach to school improvement making sure that leaders and governors carry out regular and rigorous premises checks and take action to make improvements where necessary, and that the school provides a suitable and stimulating environment for pupils and staff.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
The attainment of pupils on entry to the school varies year on year, but is generally above average. The large majority of pupils make good overall progress during their time at Granby. By the end of Year 6, standards are significantly above the national average as they have been for the last three years.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils of different abilities make good overall progress. The proportion attaining the higher levels in their work is good, especially in reading and mathematics. Pupils make particularly effective progress where tasks are explained well and they have sufficient time to discuss their ideas and complete their work. This was seen to good effect in Years 4/5 when pupils learned how to use connectives to join or complete sentences.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils across the school read well. Group reading activities are well organised. Pupils have a good understanding of letters and the sounds they make and read regularly in school. There is also a well-established programme where parents agree to hear their children read at least twice a week. This is proving very effective and many pupils, including the lower attainers, say they really enjoy reading.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Assessment information on pupils’ attainment and progress indicates that girls generally do slightly better than boys, especially in writing. The school has recognised this and provides activities and resources that are targeted at capturing boys’ interest. For example, pupils in Year 3 enjoyed planning their own version of myths, legends and fables when focusing on the story of Hercules. This whole-school approach is working well and the gaps in attainment between different groups are narrowing.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils make strong progress in mathematics with many reaching the higher levels in their work. This was well illustrated in a Year 6 mathematics lesson where pupils converted fractions into decimals. With a close focus on what each number represented, pupils clearly recognised where the decimal point was in their calculations.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils are supported well through the use of pupil premium funding. For example, pupils eligible for free school meals attain better – with higher average point scores in the Year 6 English and mathematics tests – than similar pupils nationally, and equally well with others in the school, in all areas of their learning and, particularly, in reading and mathematics.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, those from minority ethnic groups and the very small number speaking English as an additional language also achieve well and make similar overall progress to their classmates.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Teaching in most subjects, including English and mathematics is good. However, this is, occasionally, a little too variable. While no outstanding teaching was seen during the inspection, school data showing pupils’ progress and attainment and samples of their recent work indicate effective teaching and learning over time.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
In all classes, a positive feature is the strong working relationship between staff and pupils. There is a warmth between adults and their charges that results in many pupils wanting to please their teacher and therefore, work hard.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Staff use praise well to motivate pupils. This was seen to good effect in Years 4/5 when pupils with behaviour, social and emotional difficulties were very well supported by the teacher, which enabled them to keep a focus on their learning.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Staff generally explain things clearly to pupils so that they learn effectively. For example, good explanation was observed where pupils were told how to calculate decimals and fractions. However, in some lessons, teachers talk for too long and pupils’ attention drifts. They are then sometimes unsure what they have to do next to take their learning forward. In these situations and, occasionally, even when teaching is good, pupils lack the opportunity to develop their own ideas in discussion with partners or in small groups.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Most staff use questions well to check pupils’ understanding. They give good verbal feedback so that most pupils know what they have done well or what they can improve. The marking of pupils’ work is thorough.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Where teaching is particularly strong, teachers expect a lot of pupils and plan learning carefully to interest and stimulate learners of all abilities. The planning of learning, however, is sometimes too variable and occasionally the work is the same or very similar for groups of differing abilities, which does not ensure the best level of challenge for all.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teaching assistants are deployed well, helping individuals and small groups, including disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, and those entitled to pupil premium support both in and out of lessons.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils is good
The large majority of pupils behave well. Most indicate they enjoy coming to school because they like their teachers and meeting their friends. Many enter the school having achieved some success in Key Stage 1 and already have positive attitudes to their learning. Most concentrate and try hard with their work, although, occasionally, some are rather passive in their learning and do not offer much to discussions.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils is good
Most pupils get on well together. They say they like playtimes and know they have to be aware of others in the crowded school playground. Whole-school assemblies focus well on staying safe, including road safety when coming to school.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils is good
There have been no recent exclusions from school. Observations and school logs show there have been few incidents of unacceptable behaviour. Such a good record is a credit to the school and shows that the small numbers of boys with behaviour, emotional and social difficulties are well managed. This ensures their behaviour does not impact on the safety of others.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils is good
Pupils can clearly explain what bullying is, including cyber-bullying. They understand that they have to be responsible in the use of computers and mobile phones. A small number of parents and carers have concerns about bullying, including name-calling. Discussion with older pupils indicates they are aware of such issues and believe it does happen at times, but recognise it is not acceptable. Attendance and punctuality are generally good. The situation is closely checked by the school and any concerns are carefully tracked and followed up.
p.5
The leadership and management is good
School leaders and managers have a clear vision for the school based on the priority to improve teaching and pupils’ progress. The impact of their determined approach is well illustrated by the rise in standards in recent years.
p.6
The leadership and management is good
The headteacher has a secure grasp of assessment data which is now used effectively to track pupils’ progress, both that of individuals and groups. This information is used well to identify any underachievement and to ensure extra help is provided for those who need it most. Pupil premium funding is used effectively to support eligible pupils. Their progress is tracked carefully and effective support provided, as seen in how well these pupils achieve compared to similar pupils nationally.
p.6
The leadership and management is good
A range of training and professional development opportunities are available to staff to help them improve their teaching. These are not extensive, however, and leaders are right to seek more links with other schools and external groups, such as advisers and consultants, to ensure that the pace of improvement continues and that there is more outstanding teaching. Subject leaders currently have few opportunities to check planning, teaching and learning and, thereby, influence developments in the subjects and topics taught.
p.6
The leadership and management is good
Performance management of staff is organised appropriately and appraisal arrangements identify individual and school priorities. The headteacher makes decisions about teachers’ movement on the salary scale accurately based on the quality of teaching in helping pupils to make progress.
p.6
The leadership and management is good
The range of subjects and topics taught is broad and balanced and well matched to pupils’ learning needs. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are well catered for. There has been a strong and successful focus on reading which has a positive impact across all subjects.
p.6
The leadership and management is good
Pupil’s spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted effectively, including through a focus on developing pupils’ social and moral skills to equip them for their future. The range of subject content taught supports the school’s drive to promote equality of opportunity, and to tackle swiftly any discrimination that may arise.
p.6
The leadership and management is good
Parent View and discussions with parents and carers indicate that a high proportion would wholeheartedly recommend the school. The local authority provides effective support through the adviser linked to the school and has been helpful in supporting improvements in teaching, with scope to increase these links further.
p.6
The leadership and management is good
The school accommodation is in a shabby state. Some parts of the building, especially the school house, provide inadequate facilities for their intended purpose, including the staffroom accommodation for over 40 staff. Occasionally, the storage of equipment raises health and safety concerns. While there have been occasional risk assessments on the premises carried out that have accurately identified such failings, these are not always acted on rigorously enough. These matters do not endanger pupils’ safety, and all safeguarding requirements are met. However, classrooms have often limited display material and do not provide a stimulating learning environment. Some communal areas are in a poor state and do not indicate to prospective parents that this is now a good school.
p.6
The leadership and management is good
The governance of the school: The governing body has newly elected office holders who, as experienced governors, already have a good understanding of the school’s performance data and how this compares to that of other schools. They are well supported by other governors and an appropriate range of meetings and sub-committee activities. Governors link with members of staff to extend their knowledge of what is taught and of standards attained. They have an accurate understanding of the quality of teaching. Governors undertake training and ensure suitable systems to manage staff performance are in place. They make sure that effective performance is linked to pay. They are informed about the use of funding for the pupil premium and how the school tracks pupil progress to assess the effectiveness of such expenditure. Governors are already starting to question school leadership more vigorously about priorities for the budget. They
p.7
The leadership and management is good
recognise the priority to address the poor state of the school accommodation and ensure it provides high-quality facilities for pupils and staff in order to meet the good standards that staff and pupils deserve.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.8
School details
Unique reference number 112571 Local authority Derbyshire Inspection number 405398 This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Type of school Junior School category Community Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 322 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jason Farrar Headteacher Brian Allsopp Date of previous school inspection 21 March 2011 Telephone number 0115 932 2424 Fax number 0115 932 2424 Email address enquiries@granby.derbyshire.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.10
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion