Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Middleton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Middleton

  • Postcode verified

    LU4 9TJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellsuccessfulsuccessfullystrongeffectiveclearstronglypositive
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings667w+80
  • What needs to improve31w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
689
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 29, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 96%What needs to improve 4%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Dame Yasmin Bevan Executive Headteacher Challney High School for Boys Stoneygate Road Luton Bedfordshire LU4 9TJ Dame Yasmin Bevan Executive Headteacher Challney High School for Boys Stoneygate Road Luton Bedfordshire LU4 9TJ

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 28 and 29 January to look at the school’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with the co-ordinator of alternative provision and with a group of students and examined a range of documents. I also visited the following providers that your students attend: Eden Therapeutic Centre, Active Support, Xers Motorcross Project and Woodlands Secondary School for students with special educational needs.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Provision is very well coordinated by the assistant headteacher in charge of inclusion, and a team of staff specialist in pastoral, special educational needs and careers support who ensure that off-site programmes are very well matched to students’ individual needs. This complements the school’s wider approach to personalisation. The process is supported by individual interviews and tailored timetables for all students and managed by senior staff.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Procedures for selecting and commissioning alternative providers benefit from the effective support of the local authority. Providers that the authority suggests have a successful track record of work with schools locally. The involvement of a partner school in re-integrating students into school life adds to the quality of provision.  While different providers commonly focus on improving students’ attendance and attitudes to learning, their approaches are wide-ranging. Their different specialisms, for example sports, enable the school to tap into students’ specific interests. Accreditation adds rigour and contributes to developing the study skills that students might not have applied previously to their school-based work. Some students return to school sufficiently well equipped to take a leading role in the learning of others, for example by becoming mentors.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The providers are very well informed about students’ background and targets are clear. Detailed referral forms are supported by liaison meetings that involve the school, provider, student and parent or carer. The staff responsible for monitoring students’ progress off-site maintain regular contact. This is supported by clear additional procedures should any concerns arise, for example with regard to safeguarding.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The small proportion of students who access alternative provision off-site do so part-time. High priority is given to the continuous learning of English and mathematics in school, and the application of key skills in the context of alternative provision. Students follow GCSE, functional skills, ASDAN, City and Guilds courses and additional awards. The school’s systematic procedures for tracking students’ progress are strongly focused on achievement for all. The continuing commitment of school staff to students when off-site is a strong feature. For example, a student accessing education while in hospital still achieved well.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Detailed case studies demonstrate the impact of alternative provision. Improvements in students’ attendance, attitudes to learning, ability to work collaboratively and cooperatively are common. As a consequence, most continue their education or training at further education colleges. Some students enter employment directly having experienced part-time employment or having successfully completed work-experience, an expectation of all students at the start of Year 11.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students value the alternative provision highly. They appreciate the opportunity to develop positive relationships with other adults and students. They enjoy their taste of an authentic working environment which most providers successfully create. However, students’ successful re-integration into full-time education at Challney remains their goal; time for reflection out of school is a contributory factor. Examples of students’ personal statements show that attending alternative provision helps them to learn to take responsibility.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that providers’ grading systems are compatible with those that students are familiar with in school  incorporating off-site settings into the school’s programme of lesson observations and teacher evaluations.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion