Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Stoberry Park School
Summary
Carol Warrant (lead), Colin Lee, Susan Payne
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
31 Jan 2013
- Inspectors verified
Carol Warrant, Colin Lee, Susan Payne
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
BA5 2TJ
- Name on report verified
Stoberry Park School
- URN verified
132227
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- While pupils at the end of Year 6 reach standards that are in line with national expectations, too few pupils make good progress, especially in writing. p.1
- The quality of teaching over time is inconsistent and there is not enough good teaching, especially in Years 3 and 4, to make sure that all pupils consistently make the progress they could. p.1
- Marking does not always tell pupils what they need to do to improve. p.1
- Learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage is too adult led, children do not have enough opportunities to make choices and extend their own learning. p.1
- Leaders and governors do not use information well enough to know what progress they are making towards their targets for improvement or to link the quality of teaching to pupil progress. p.1
- The school does not always provide parents with the information they need to be more actively involved in supporting their children’s learning. p.1
- Achievement over time requires improvement because, although standards are average by the end of Year 6, not enough pupils make good progress. p.4
- Current achievement requires improvement. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,340
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Stoberry Park School North Road, Wells, BA5 2TJ
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
While pupils at the end of Year 6 reach standards that are in line with national expectations, too few pupils make good progress, especially in writing. The quality of teaching over time is inconsistent and there is not enough good teaching, especially in Years 3 and 4, to make sure that all pupils consistently make the progress they could. Marking does not always tell pupils what they need to do to improve. Learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage is too adult led, children do not have enough opportunities to make choices and extend their own learning. Leaders and governors do not use information well enough to know what progress they are making towards their targets for improvement or to link the quality of teaching to pupil progress. The school does not always provide parents with the information they need to be more actively involved in supporting their children’s learning.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Teaching in Key Stage 1 and Years 5 and 6 is stronger and more effective. Standards in Key Stage 1 are improving, particularly in reading, because the teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters make) is effective and pupils make rapid progress in early reading skills. Pupils behave consistently well in and out of classrooms. Pupils are sensible, polite and show good attitudes to learning. They feel safe in school. Attendance has improved since the last inspection and is now above average.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 21 lessons, of which two were joint observations with the headteacher. In addition, inspectors listened to pupils read and made a number of other short visits to lessons. Meetings were held with pupils, the headteacher, members of the senior leadership team, representatives of the governing body, and an officer from the local authority accompanied by the National Leader of Education currently working with the school. Inspectors observed the school’s work, looked at safeguarding arrangements as well as other information including policies, procedures, school development plans and self-evaluation, external evaluations and a range of pupils’ work. Inspectors took account of 63 responses to the on-line Parent View survey, as well as other verbal and written responses from parents and carers. Inspectors also examined questionnaire responses from 33 members of staff.
p.2
Inspection team
Carol Warrant, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Susan Payne Additional Inspector Colin Lee Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Stoberry Park School is a larger-than-average-sized primary school. The school is organised in two Reception classes, three mixed Year 1 and Year 2 classes, three mixed Year 3 and Year 4 classes and three mixed Year 5 and Year 6 classes. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium (extra funding to support pupils eligible for free school meals, those looked after by the local authority and those children from service families) is below the national average. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is well below average. A small number of pupils are learning to speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils supported through school action is above average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations
p.3
Information about this school
for pupils’ attainment and progress. No pupils are taught in alternative provision. There is a breakfast and after-school club and a preschool on the school site; these are not managed by the governing body.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, especially in the Reception classes and in Years 3 and 4, to good or better to ensure pupils make consistently good or better progress, especially in writing, by: ensuring marking always includes points for improvement and pupils are given opportunities to respond to teachers’ marking ensuring pupils fully understand their learning in all lessons and can judge when their learning is successful improving the balance of activities that are led by adults and those that children choose for themselves in the Reception classes. Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: checking up on the school’s plans for improvement more rigorously checking up more closely on the impact of the quality of teaching on the progress and outcomes for all pupils improving governors’ understanding of how the governors check up on the progress of all pupils providing parents with information about their children’s progress, more often, so that they
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
can better support them in their learning.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Achievement over time requires improvement because, although standards are average by the end of Year 6, not enough pupils make good progress. Current achievement requires improvement. This is supported by the school’s data on pupils’ progress, work in pupils' books and inspection findings. Most year groups enter the Reception classes with the knowledge and skills similar to those typically expected for their age. Most make the progress expected by the time they enter Year 1. Standards at the end of Year 2 are broadly average in writing and mathematics and above average in reading. Achievement in writing is weaker than in reading and mathematics because, while steps are being taken to improve standards in writing, there are inconsistencies in the amount and quality of the writing that pupils produce and they are not given enough opportunities to write at length and in other subjects. In some classes, pupils’ progress in writing is being impeded by the use of
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
too many worksheets. Pupils’ progress in mathematics is improving. Pupils are now acquiring and using the main methods of calculation competently. However, they do not have enough opportunities to develop their problem-solving skills in mathematics or in other subjects. Progress in reading is more consistent across the school. Pupils make good progress in their early reading because the teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters make) is effective. Older pupils have a wide range of books in school and enjoy reading. The best readers are fluent and read with expression. They are developing opinions about favourite types of books and authors. Less confident readers are supported in small group and individual sessions for phonics. Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make the progress typically expected for this group in English, but below that expected in mathematics. Recent action has been taken to raise the achievement of pupils eligible for pupil premium
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
funding. The gap between the average point scores for these pupils and other pupils in the school at the end of Key Stage 2 in 2012 was 5.2 in English and 3.5 in mathematics. Current school tracking data show good progress for current pupils eligible for pupil premium funding and that the gap is closing in Key Stage 2. The small number of pupils who are learning to speak English as an additional language attain as well as other pupils in the school.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Over time, teaching has not been consistently good enough to ensure that all pupils make consistently good progress. Teaching is improving but there is not enough good or better teaching and some weaknesses in practice remain, especially in Years 3 and 4 and in the Reception classes. Children’s learning in the Reception classes is too heavily teacher directed and children are not given sufficient opportunities or resources to be active and to explore and extend their own learning. Children are often kept too long on the carpet and sitting at tables during sessions on phonics, reading and handwriting. In weaker lessons, expectations of what pupils can achieve are not high enough and there is confusion between the purpose of the lesson, the work children are asked to do and how they will know of they have succeeded. The school has recently introduced ‘learning journeys’ across Key Stage 1 and 2. These show pupils, at the beginning of each lesson, how the learning within
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
a unit of work fits together. However, these are sometimes focused on what pupils are doing rather than learning. When this is the case, pupils do not make the progress in their learning that they should. Where teaching is best lessons have a clear purpose and teachers share the ‘learning journey’, its purpose and how pupils can be successful learners effectively with the class. As a result, pupils know what they are expected to learn and can judge when they have succeeded. Where teaching is good, especially in Key Stage 1 and Years 5 and 6, pupils are actively engaged and make good progress. For example, in a Year 6 mathematics lesson, pupils made good progress because the teacher linked the lesson to prior learning and pupils used their knowledge, skills and understanding to solve problems. The teacher checked pupils’ understanding throughout the lesson and adjusted expectations and challenge where needed.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Most teachers mark pupils’ work regularly and provide useful feedback. However, pupils are not given enough opportunities to respond to the teachers’ comments. Pupils know their individual targets and can describe what they need to do to improve their work and meet their targets. The teaching of reading, especially at Key Stage 1, has improved since the last inspection. The introduction of a commercial programme and the increased emphasis on the teaching of phonics lead to pupils making rapid progress in their early reading skills. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are well supported by teaching assistants in class. They also receive good one-to-one or small-group support from knowledgeable and experienced teaching assistants for both English and mathematics. Pupils eligible for pupil premium funding also receive additional small group and one-to-one support for reading and writing and mathematics from an additional teacher and teaching
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
assistants and this contributes to the narrowing of the gap in their achievement.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils behave well in lessons. They work readily in pairs and groups and support one another in their learning. Behaviour around the school is generally good. Pupil mediators are trained by staff and are ‘on duty’ in both school playgrounds at playtime and lunchtime. Mediators are very proud of their roles. School records of incidents are not centralised, but procedures and support for the minority of pupils with behavioural difficulties are well documented and appropriately dealt with, including appropriate support from outside agencies. Pupils have a good understanding of safety and say they feel safe in school. They understand the forms that bullying can take, including cyber bullying, and although they say bullying is rare are confident of who to go to and that things would be dealt with should they have a problem. Relationships between adults and pupils and among pupils are positive. The school council is very active and proud of its many achievements, including fundraising and
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
producing a high-quality induction booklet for pupils new to the school. Attendance has improved since the last inspection, and is now above average overall, with persistent absence reduced. Children in the Reception classes make good progress in their personal, social and emotional development.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
Although there have been improvements since the last inspection, the rate of improvement has not been fast enough to ensure that the quality of teaching is consistently good or better and all groups of pupils achieve well. However, where the school identified teaching as inadequate, senior leaders have taken action to eradicate this. Senior leaders are now focused on ensuring that teaching is consistently good or better in all classes and the school has the capacity to improve. Senior leaders hold regular meetings with teachers to discuss pupils’ achievement and organise additional support, including links with outside agencies, for those pupils who are not making expected progress. Performance management outcomes are linked with staff training, promotion and increases in pay. Attention is given to checking whether pupils are making the nationally expected rate of progress over each key stage. However, senior leaders do not use achievement information well
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
enough to check on the numbers of pupils who are making good progress and to make certain that all pupils are achieving well. As a result, leaders do not have a complete picture of how well pupils are achieving, or use achievement information rigorously enough to identify aspects of teaching that could be improved overall and for individual teachers. Recent plans for improvement show what the school is intending to do to improve, but these plans do not have enough detail of any predicted improvements to pupils’ progress, especially for different groups, to give rigorous evidence of the effectiveness of the school’s actions. The school has various ways to encourage parents to be involved in the work of the school, such as Inspire Days when parents are invited into school to learn with the children, The Circle of Friends (parents association) and the recently formed Parent Forum. However, parents who
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
gave their views through Parent View and letters to the inspectors expressed concerns about the information they receive about their children’s’ progress and how well the school responds to their concerns. Inspectors have asked the school to address these concerns from parents. The current curriculum supports pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. There are many opportunities for pupils to take part in a range of enrichment activities, such as after- school clubs, educational visits and residential trips in Year 4 and Year 6. The school is currently introducing a revised curriculum in order ensure pupils’ skills are developed successfully and to improve links between subjects. Pupil premium funding finances the employment of additional teaching and teaching assistant time, as well as additional resources for reading and writing. Current school tracking data show that additional one-to-one and small-group support is accelerating progress for pupils who are
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
eligible. The school is committed to equal opportunities and discrimination in any form is not tolerated. The local authority has commissioned support for the school from a National Leader of Education who has been working with the school. This support will continue. The school also works collaboratively with other schools in the Wells Community Learning Partnership. The governance of the school: – The governing body is highly committed and is diligent in its management of finances and resources. The governors have recently reorganised their work in order to be more effective and they visit the school regularly. They have attended training and have the necessary skills and experience to fulfil their statutory duties, including with regard to safeguarding. The governing body and school leaders make decisions about linking pay to teachers’ performance, and how to allocate funding, such as the pupil premium. The governors’ understanding of the
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
impact of this funding is informed by the headteacher’s reports to governors. The governing body has a good general understanding of pupils’ attainment by the end of Year 2 and Year 6 and of pupils’ progress in Key Stage 2 and how this compares with achievement nationally. However, governors are not providing sufficient challenge to the school in relation to the achievement of children in Reception and for pupils in Years 3 and 4.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 132227 Local authority Somerset Inspection number 406486
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 311 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Allan Jamieson Headteacher Michael Hawkins Date of previous school inspection 10–11 November 2010 Telephone number 01749 672516 Fax number 01749 670822 Email address mhawkins@educ.somerset.gov.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion